题名

Gender Differences and Listener Responses in Spanish Foreign Language Conversations

并列篇名

西語作為第二外語的對話中之性別差意及聽者回應

DOI

10.7084/LIS.201212.0001

作者

魯四維(Javier Pérez Ruiz)

关键词

聽者回應 ; 會話分析 ; 性別差異 ; 西文外語學習 ; Listener Responses ; Conversation ; Gender ; Spanish Language

期刊名称

語文與國際研究

卷期/出版年月

9期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

西班牙文

中文摘要

此論文主要是研究不同性別以西班牙語當作第二外語時在口語互動上的影響。這兩人一組的西語對話分別由台灣學習西語的20男性及20位女性所執行,該篇論文尤其著重於聽者回應技巧的探索。為確保研究的有效性,其樣本設定在以下的社會語言學變量:研究對象的年齡、性別、社會地位及語言流暢度在目標語間的連帶關係。論文研究結果顯示在定量與定性的情況下,男女學習者在聽者回應上有差異性。女性的對話較屬於合作性且語言較為流暢,其中原因是由於女性在對話中使用較多的聽者回應技巧。這項研究發現對外語課程具有相當的重要性,因為它指出在第二外語的會話中,聽者回應是很基本的要素,透過聽者回應,使第二外語的對話變得更加自然且不造作。

英文摘要

This paper investigates the influence of gender on the oral interaction in Spanish as a foreign language. In particular, it explores the listener responses mechanisms of Taiwanese learners in Spanish foreign language through the natural dyadic Spanish conversation conducted by 20 males and 20 females. To insure the internal validity of this study, the researcher has standardized the samples according to age, gender, social status and Spanish language proficiency.The results show quantitative and qualitative gender differences in listener responses behavior between male and female students. The conversation between females is more collaborative and fluent than in male conversation. The reason is that females use more and different listener responses strategies in the oral interaction. This finding has a significant relevance in foreign language classroom learning, because it indicates that the listener responses in the conversation are essential component that contributes to the more natural and spontaneous interaction between learners.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
人文學 > 外國文學
参考文献
  1. Bell, C.M.,McCarthy, P. M.,McNamara, D. S.(2006).Variations in Language Use across Gender: Biological versus Sociological Theories.Proceeding of the 28th Annual Conference of the cognitive science society,Mahwah, NJ:
  2. Bengoechea Bartolomé, M.(1993).Dominance and sex: two independent variables in the analysis of interruption.Pragmalingüística,1,35-62.
  3. Bennett, M.,Jarvis, J.(1991).The Communicative Function of Minimal Responses in Everyday Conversation.The Journal of Social Psychology,131(4),519-32.
  4. Bilous, F. R.,Krauss, R. M.(1988).Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads.Language and Communication,8,183-194.
  5. Cestero Mancera, A. M.(2007).Cooperación en la conversación: estrategias estructurales características de las mujeres.Linred. Lingüística en la red,5,1-17.
  6. Cestero Mancera, A. M.(2000).Los turnos de apoyo conversacionales.Cádiz:Universidad de Cadiz.
  7. Clancy, P. M.,Thompson, S. A.,Suzuki, R.,Tao, H.(1996).The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin.Journal of Pragmatics,26(3),355-387.
  8. Coates, J.(1986).Women, men, and language.London:Longman.
  9. de Europa, Consejo(2002).Marco Común Europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación.Madrid:Secretaria General Tecnica del MECD-Subdireccion General de Informacion y Publicaciones y Grupo ANAYA, S.A..
  10. Dixon, J. A.,Foster, D. H.(1998).Gender, Social Context, and Backchannel Responses.Journal of Social Psychology,138(1),134-136.
  11. Feke, M. S.(2003).Effects of Native-Language and Sex on Back-Channel Behavior.Selected Proceedings of the First Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics,Somerville, MA:
  12. Fujimoto, D. T.(2007).Listener responses in Interaction: a case of abandoning the term backchannel.大阪女学院短期大学紀要,37,35-54.
  13. Gardner, R.(2001).When listeners talk.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  14. Gascoigne, C.(2002).The Role of Gender in L2 Interaction: Socialization vía L2 Materials.Encuentro Revista de investigación e innovación en la clase de idiomas,13-14,81-89.
  15. Goldshmidt, O. T.,Weller, L.(2000).Talking emotions: gender differences in a variety of conversational contexts.Symbolic Interaction,23,117-34.
  16. Guerrero, S.(2011).Diferencias de género en evaluaciones de narraciones de experiencias personales en el habla juvenil de Santiago de Chile.Una aproximación sociolingüística Revista Signos,44(75),18-32.
  17. Gumperz, J. J.(1982).Discourse Strategies.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  18. Gumperz, J. J.(Ed.)(1982).Language and social identity.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  19. Heinz, B.(2003).Backchannel responses as strategic responses in bilingual speakers' conversations.Journal of Pragmatics,35(7),1113-1142.
  20. Holmes, J.(Ed.),Meyerhoff, M.(Ed.)(2003).The handbook of Language and Gender.Oxford:Blackwell.
  21. Hutchby, I.,Wooffitt, R.(2008).Conversation analysis.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  22. Inglés Candelas, B.(2010).,Madrid:Universidad Antonio de Nebrija.
  23. Ishida, H.(2006).Learners' perception and interpretation of contextualization cues in spontaneous Japanese conversation: Back-channel cue Uun.Journal of Pragmatics,38(11),1943-1981.
  24. Itakura, H.(2004).Gender and conversational dominance in Japanese conversation.Language in Society,33,223-248.
  25. Leaper, C.,Smith, T. E.(2004).A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech.Developmental Psychology,40,993-1027.
  26. Marche, T.A.,Peterson, C.(1993).On the gender differential use of listener responsiveness.Sex Roles,29,795-816.
  27. Maynard, S. K.(1997).Analyzing interactional management in native/non-native English conversation: A case of listener response.Interactional Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,35(1),37-60.
  28. Mclachlan, A.(1991).The effects of agreement, disagreement, gender and familiarity on patterns of dyadic interaction.Journal of language and social psychology,10,205-212.
  29. Mizutani, N.(1982).The listener's responses in Japanese conversation.Sociolinguistics Newsletter,13,33-38.
  30. Moreno Fernández, F.(1990).Metodología sociolingüística.Madrid:Gredos.
  31. Pérez Ruiz, J.(2011).Madrid,Universidad Nebrija.
  32. Pérez Ruiz, J.(2010).Estrategias esenciales de producción de los turnos de apoyo verbales en estudiantes ELE. Resultados preliminares.Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada,8(4),126-159.
  33. Psathas, G.(1979).Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology.New York:Irvington Publishers.
  34. Reid, J.(1995).A study of gender differences in minimal responses.Journal of Pragmatics,24(5),489-512.
  35. Roger, D. B.,Nesshoever, W.(1987).Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: A further study.British Journal of Social Psychology,26,247-255.
  36. Sussman, N.M.,Tyson, D.H.(2000).Sex and power: gender differences in computer-mediated interactions.Computers in Human Behavior,16,381-394.
  37. Tanaka, K.(2007).Diferential use of reactive tokens in Japanese in turn management and by gender.Japan:Temple University.
  38. Tannen, D.(1990).You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation.New York:William Morrow.
  39. Tannen, D.(Ed.)(1993).Gender and Conversational Interaction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  40. Thome, B.(Ed.),Kramarae, C.(Ed.),Henley, N.(Ed.)(1983).Language, gender and society.Rowley:Newbury House.
  41. Turkstra, L.,Ciccia, A.,Seaton, C.(2003).Interactive Behaviors in Adolescent Conversation Dyads.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools,34(2),117-142.
  42. Ueno, J.(2005).Gender differences in Japanese conversation.Journal of Intercultural Communication Studies,15,92-107.
  43. Vázquez Veiga, N.(2000).Respuestas mínimas reguladoras: Los límites de la marginalidad.Oralia: Análisis del Discurso Oral,3,221-242.
  44. Zimmerman, D. H.,West, C.(1975).Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation.Language and sex: difference and dominance