威權政治與知識經濟并進下的監視社會發展：以新加坡的綱路管制體制為例

10.7039/TJSAST.200410.0085

董娟娟

科技民主賦權 ； 監視社會理論 ； 超級電子全景敞視主義 ； 新加坡 ； 綱路管制 ； technodemocracy empowerment ； surveillance society theory ； superelectronic panopticism ； Singapore ； Internet regulation

台灣東南亞學刊

1卷2期（2004 / 10 / 01）

85 - 135

繁體中文

「科技民主賦權論」強調綱路應用促進民主社會的發展，然而許多研究已指出：新加坡高度的綱路應用并不支持該理論。資訊社會研究者轉而以「監視社會理論」解釋星國綱路的高度使用何以未能有效促進該國的民主化，「監視社會理論」對提示當代資訊社會秩序所點出的「超級電子全景敞視主義」，是解釋新加坡利用綱路管制體制的形塑，強化「高度監視社會」基礎的重要論述。威權國家的民主轉型過程，涵蓋政治、經濟、社會、文化與科技等多重面向的變遷動力，綱路應用不論是扮演著積極的民主觸媒或威權固權的可能角色，其能動性脫离不了與其它變遷面向的互動，新加坡的案例顯示綱路管制與應用仍深沉鑲嵌於特定地域的政治、經濟、社會、與歷史文化的形構中。這類文獻的研究成果相當豐碩，但結論多認為威權政治與知識經濟無法并存，星國若要在激烈的全球競爭下求生，政論必須放松政治控制，才可望以知識經濟策略求取發展。本文認為從國家發展層次來看新加坡監視社會的進程，其實顯示出星國是以監視社會控制的發展路數，統整其在全球化下威權政治與知識經濟并行的兩難。既有文獻宣稱威權政治與知識經濟無法并存，不僅達逆本身的研究結果，也限制其從更高的抽象層次理解新加坡在近年整合威權政治、知識經濟與監視社會的三合一發展模式之可能性。

Theories of technodemocracy empowerment emphasize the use of Internet in facilitating the development of democracy. However, the surveillance literature questions why the extensive use of Internet in Singapore did not effectively stimulate its democratization. Derived from surveillance society theory, the super-electronic panopticism is applicable to explain the formation of Singapore’s Internet regulatory regime in enforcing a highly developed surveillance society. The Singapore case demonstrates that the regulation and practice of Internet is deeply embedded in the configuration of political, economic, social, historical, and cultural forces. Democratization of an authoritarian regime will depend on the interplay of those dynamics. No matter how the Internet facilitates democratization or enforces authoritarization, this agency alone cannot advance a large-scale and specific development without interacting with other factors as well. There are many contributions in the surveillance literature, however; the mutual exclusion of authoritarian politics and knowledge economy in their conclusion does not reflect the current situation. This paper argues that, to some extent, Singapore’s surveillance society strategy is to integrate authoritarian politics and knowledge economy within the era of globalization. The incompatible interpretation of authoritarian politics and knowledge economy in the existing literature blocks them from understanding the convergence of authoritarian politics, kno.wledge economy, and surveillance society as Singapore’ survival strategy.

1. 李文志(2002)。杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係。問題與研究，41(4)，1-20。
   連結：
2. 李明哲、唐志宏(2002)。網路商業化與網路民主。資訊社會研究，3，251-267。
   連結：
3. 范傑臣(2002)。從多國網路內容管制政策談台灣網路規範努力方向。資訊社會研究，2，205-223。
   連結：
4. 歐賢超、顧長永(2002)。李光耀實踐「亞洲價值」之評析。國家發展季刊，2(1)，43-79。
   連結：
5. The Straits Times
6. 南華早報
7. (2001)。新加坡：新加坡電信公司的海外擴信。每日亞太簡報。
8. MDA (Media Development Authority)
9. SG News
10. 各政黨歷屆總得票率比較
11. 聯合早報
12. Agger, Ben,Tim Luke,Dobratz, Betty A.,Timothy Buzzell,Lisa K. Waldner (eds.)(2002).Theoretical Directions in Political Sociology for the 21 Century.Oxford:Elsevier Science Ltd.
13. Alvin Y. So,Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao (eds.)(1999).East Asian Middle Classes in Comparative Perspective.London:SAGE.
14. Censorship and the Internet: A Singapore Perspective
15. Arun, Mahizhnan,Mui Teng Yap(2000).Singapore: the Development of an Intelligent Island and Social Dividends of Information Technology.Urban Studies,37(10),1749-1756.
16. Baber, Zaheer(2002).Engendering or Endangering Democracy? The Internet, Civil Society and the Public Sphere.Asian Journal of Social Science,30(2),287-303.
17. Banerjee, Indrajit,Benjamin Yeo,Indrajit Banerjee (ed.)(2003).Rhetoric and Reality. the Internet Challenge for Democracy in Asia.Singapore:Eastern University Press.
18. Bellamy, Christine,John A. Taylor(1998).Governing in the Information Age.Buckingham:Open University Press.
19. Botan, Carl(1996).Communication Work and Electronic Surveillance: A Model for Predicting Panoptic Effects.Communication Monograph,63(4),293-313.
20. Brants, K.,M. Huizenga,Van R. Meerten(1996).The New Canals of Amsterdam: an Exercise in Local Electronic Democracy.Media, Culture, and Society,18,233-247.
21. Castells, Manuel(2001).The Internet Galaxy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
22. Catinat, Michel,Thierry Vedel,Kenneth L. Hacker,Jan van Dijk (eds.)(2000).Digital Democracy.London:SAGE.
23. Report held by Lim Tung Hee and Chee Siok Chin, Singapore Democrats Launch Report
24. Paper presented at the Conference on the Media and Democracy
25. Chew, Melanie(1994).Human Rights in Singapore: Perceptions and Problems.Asian Survey,34(11),933-948.
26. Crush, Jonathan(1992).Power and Surveillance on the South African Gold Mines.Journal of Southern African Studies,18(4),825-844.
27. Culter, Fre(1999).Jeremy Bentham and the Public Opinion Tribunal.Public Opinion Quarterly,63(3),321-346.
28. Dandeker, Christopher(1990).Surveillance, Power and Modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
29. Derek, da Cunha(1997).The Price of Victory.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
30. Acquiescence, Indifference, Co-option: Singapore`s Shame
31. Cyberspace and the American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age
32. Flaherty, David H.(1989).Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies.Chapel Hill:the University of North Carolina Press.
33. Fopp, Rodney(2002).Increasing the Potential for Gaze, Surveillance and Normalization: the Transformation of an Australian Policy for People Who Are Homeless.Surveillance & Society,1(1),48-65.
34. Freedom in the World Country Rating 1972-73 to 2000-01
35. Freedom House Press Freedom
36. Garry Rodan (ed.)(1997).Civil Society and other Political Possibilities in Southeast Asia.Journal of Contemporary Asia,27(2),156-178.
37. Garry Rodan (ed.)(2000).Asian Crisis, Transparency and the International Media in Singapore.The Pacific Review,13(2),217-242.
38. Garry Rodan (ed.)(2002).Thaksin`s Clamp in Media: Emulating Singapore.Asiaview,21(1),10.
39. Garry Rodan (ed.)(1996).Political Oppositions in Industrializing Asia.New York:Routidge.
40. Garry Rodan (ed.)(1998).The Internet and Political Control in Singapore.Political Science Quarterly,113(1),63-89.
41. Giddens, Anthony(1985).The Nation State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism.Cambridge:Polity Press.
42. Gilliom, John(2001).Overseers of the Poor. Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy.Chicago:the University of Chicago Press.
43. Gomez, James(2000).Self-Censorship: Singapore`s Shame.Singapore:Think Center.
44. Gomez, James(2002).Internet Politics: Surveillance and Intimidation in Singapore.Singapore:Think Center.
45. Guillen M.F.,S.L. Suarez(2001).Developing the Internet: Entrepreneurship and Public Policy in Ireland, Singapore, Argentina, and Spain.Telecommunications Policy,25,349-371.
46. Hagen, Martin,Kenneth L. Hacker,Jan van Dijk (eds.)(2000).Digital Democracy.London:SAGE.
47. Ho, Khai Leong(2000).Prime Ministerial Leadership and Policy-making Style in Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong Compared.Asian Journal of Political Science,8(1),91-123.
48. Hogan, Sarah B.(1999).To Net or Not to Net: Singapore`s Regulation of the Internet: Singapore`s Regulation of the Internet.Federal Communications Law Journal,51(2),429-447.
49. Huntington, Samuel P.(1991).The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
50. Hwa, Ang Peng(2000).Arts and Media Scenes in Singapore.Singapore:MITA.
51. Careful Big Brother Is Watching: New Advances in Surveillance Technology Threaten Your Privacy
52. 2003 World Press Freedom Review
53. Jankowski, Nicholas,Martine van Selm,Kenneth L. Hacker,Jan van Dijk (eds.)(2000).Digital Democracy.London:SAGE.
54. Jordan, Tim(1999).Cyberpower.New York:Routledge.
55. Kalathil, Shanthi,Taylor C. Boas(2003).Open Networks, Closed Regimes: the Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule.Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution Press.
56. Carnegie Working Papers No.21
57. Kearney., A.T.(2002).Globalization`s Last Hurrah.Foreign Policy.
58. Kearney., A.T.(2003).Measuring Globalization: Who`s Up, Who`s Down.Foreign Policy.
59. Kearney., A.T.(2001).Measuring Globalization.Foreign Policy.
60. Kearney., A.T.(2004).Measuring Globalization: Economic Reversals, Forward Momentum.Foreign Policy.
61. Kenneth L. Hacker,Jan van Dijk (eds.)(2000).Digital Democracy.London:SAGE.
62. Kenneth L. Hacker,Jan van Dijk (eds.)(2000).Digital Democracy.London:SAGE.
63. Kuo, Eddie C. Y.,Alfred Choi,Arun Mahizhnan,Lee Wai Peng,Christina Soh(2002).Internet in Singapore: a Study on Usage and Impact.Singapore:Times Academic Press.
64. The New Republic Online
65. Lee, Kuan Yew(2000).From Third World to First.New York:Harper Collins.
66. Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts
67. Lee, Terence,Steven Gan,Jamez Gomez,Uwe Johannen (eds.)(2004).Cyberactivism: Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship.London:SAGE.
68. IDG News Service\Singapore Bureau
69. Lynch, Daniel C.(1999).After the Propaganda State.CA:Stanford University Press.
70. Lyon, David(1994).The Electronic Eye: the Rise of Surveillance Society.Cambridge:Polity Press.
71. Lyon, David(2003).Surveillance after September 1.UK:Polity Press.
72. Lyon, David(2002).Surveillance Studies: Understanding Visibility, Mobility, and the Phenetic Fix.Surveillance and Society,1(1),1-7.
73. Lyon, David(2001).Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life.Buckingham:Open University Press.
74. Mak, Lau-fong(2000).Materialism and the Singapore Middle Class.Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology,89,33-62.
75. Marsh, Robert, M.(1979).Does Democracy Hinder Economic Development in Latecomer Developing Nations.Comparative Social Research,2,215-248.
76. Marshall, T.H.(1965).Essays by T H. Marshall.New York:Anchor Books.
77. Marx, G.T.(1988).Undercover: Police Surveillance in America.Berkeley:University of California Press.
78. Marx, G.T.(1985).The Surveillance Society: the Threat of 1984-style Techniques.The Futurist,June,21-26.
79. McNally, Christopher,Charles E. Morrison(2002).Asia Security Outlook 2001.Japan:Japan Center for International Exchange.
80. Nash, Kate(2000).Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Inc.
81. Neher, Clark D.(1999).Southeast Asia in the New International Era.Boulder:Westview.
82. Neher, Clark D.,Ross Marlay(1995).Democracy and Development in Southeast Asia.Oxford:Westview Press.
83. Norris, Clive,Gary Armstrong(1999).The Maximum Surveillance Society: the Rise of CCTV.New York:Berg.
84. Ooi, Can Seng,Wolfgang Sachsenroder,Ulrike E. Frings (eds.)(1998).Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia.Brookfield:Ashgate.
85. Southeast Asian Regimes Seek to Control Internet Results Mixed
86. Pitroda, Sam(1993).Development, Democracy, and the Village Telephone.Harvard Business Review,71,66-79.
87. Poster, Mark(1990).The Mode of Information.Cambridge:Polity Press.
88. Rheingold, Howard(1995).The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier.London:Minerva.
89. Robins, K.,Webster K.,Vincent Mosco,Janet Wasko (eds.)(1988).The Political Economy of Information.WI:The University of Wisconsin Press.
90. Rojo, A.,Ragsdale, R.G.(1997).Participation in Electric Forums: Implications for the Design and Implementation of Collaborative Distributed Multimedia.Telematics and Informatics,14,83-96.
91. Journal of Information Law and Technology
92. Staples, William G.(2000).Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodern Life.New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
93. Steven Gan,Jamez Gomez,Uwe Johannen (eds.)(2004).Cyber-activism: Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship.London:SAGE.
94. Suppiah, Haymalatha(1996).The Intelligent(ce) Island: Surveillance and Social Control in Singapore.Canada:Master`s Thesis, Queen`s University, Ontario.
95. The Annual Survey of Press Freedom of 2002
96. Freedom of the Press 2003
97. Taylor, Nick(2002).State Surveillance and the Right to Privacy.Surveillance and Society,1(1),66-85.
98. The Remaking Singapore Committee Report
99. Thompson, Paul(2003).Fantasy Land: A Labor Process Critique of the 'Age of Surveillance'.Surveillance and Society,1(2),138-151.
100. Tsagarousianou, R(1999).Electronic Democracy: Rhetoric and Reality.Communications: the European Journal of Communication Research,24(2),189-208.
101. Tsagarousianou, R.,D. Tambini,C. Bryan(1998).Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civil Network.London:Rout ledge.
102. Wang, Georgette(1999).Regulating Network Communication in Asia: a Different Balancing Act.Telecommunications Policy,23,277-287.
103. Webster, Frank(1995).Theories of the Information Society.New York:Routledge.
104. Whitaker, Reg(1999).The End of Privacy.New York:the New Press.
105. AP Report
106. Wriston, Walter B.(1992).The Twilight of Sovereignty.New York:Charles Scribner`s Sons.
107. Yeo, J. K. B.(2002).Internet, Participation and Protest Potential.Singapor:Master`s Thesis submitted to Nanyang Technological University.
108. 王佳煌(2000)。資訊社會學。台北:學富文化。
109. 王佳煌(2003)。資訊科技與社會變遷。台北:韋伯。
110. 聯合報(2003/12/18)
111. 卡夫、夏洛克、法蘭西斯、Cuff, E. C.、W. W. Sharrock、D. W. Francis、林秀麗、林庭瑤、洪惠芬譯(2003)。最新社會學理論的觀點。台北:韋伯。
112. 司馬特、蔡采秀譯(1998)。傅柯。台北:巨流。
113. 布里恩、蕭美惠譯(1999)。透明社會。台北:先覺。
114. 瓦帝奇歐帝斯、林若雩譯(1999)。東南亞政治與發展。台北:韋伯。
115. 艾德喬頓、方俊育、李尚仁譯(2002)。從創新到使用：十道兼容並蓄的技術史史學提綱。當代，176，22-43。
116. 行政院國家資訊通信發展推動小組(2001)。先進國家推動資訊力研究先進國家推動資訊力研究,未出版
117. 中國時報(2003/06/27)
118. 宋鎮照(2002)。新加坡國家機關與市民社會之互動關係模式與發展。海華與東南亞研究，2(1)，1-29。
119. 周桂田(1997)。網際網路上的公共領域－在風險社會下的建構意義。第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會
120. 林若雩(1996)。國家與媒體：新加坡的新聞自由。東南亞季刊，1(3)，85-101。
121. 哈伯瑪斯、曹衛東譯(1990)。公共領域的結構轉型。台北:聯經。
122. 柯司特、夏鑄九、黃慧琦譯(2001)。千禧年之終結。台北:唐山。
123. 洪鎌德(1992)。多元族群的和諧共處－新加坡提供的範例。中國論壇，32(9)，4-23。
124. 夏匹洛、劉靜怡譯(2001)。控制權革命。台北:城邦文化。
125. 中國時報(2002/03/30)
126. 中國時報(2003/05/06)
127. 中國時報(2003/05/05)
128. 中國時報(2003/05/03)
129. 中國時報(2003/06/07)
130. 陳文賢(1997)。政府在政治經濟發展中所扮演的角色：新加坡與馬來西亞之比較。東南亞季刊，2(3)，36-51。
131. 中時晚報(2003/05/05)
132. 陳銘祥(2002)。通信的規範結構與通信變革。台北:韋伯。
133. 陳靜雲(2001)。網路議會及e-party建立網路與政治的三角關係。新新聞，729，56-59。
134. 陳鴻瑜(1997)。1997年新加坡國會選舉。東南亞季刊，2(4)，15-33。
135. 陳鴻瑜(1991)。新加坡的威權主義與發展型態。問題與研究，30(3)，29-40。
136. 麥留芳(1988)。社會控制與社會發展：新加坡模式。問題與研究，27(9)，35-44。
137. 傅柯、劉北成、楊遠嬰譯(1992)。規訂與懲罰。台北:桂冠。
138. 傅柯、謝石譯(1990)。性史。台北:結構群。
139. 黃少華、陳文江(2002)。網路空問的人際交往。嘉義:南華大學社會所。
140. 星洲日報(2000/08/17)
141. 黃維明(1998)。另類文化，網路發聲。天下雜誌，211，226-231。
142. 黃啓龍(2002)。網路上的公共領域實踐。資訊社會研究，3，85-111。
143. 葛雷漢、江淑琳譯(2002)。從哲學看網際網路。台北:韋伯。
144. 董娟娟(2003)。2003年台灣社會學年會。台北:台灣社會學會與政治大學社會學系。
145. 歐威爾、董樂文譯(2001)。一九八四。台北:志文。
146. 中國時報(2002/04/23)
147. 中國時報(2003/05/12)
148. 蕭乃沂、鄭嘉豪、李惠如(2002)。各國推動電子化政府之比較。2002年服務創新績效電子化政府的願景研討會，台北:
149. 中國時報(2003/05/11)
150. 中國時報(2003/04/27)
151. 瞿海源(2001)。網路公共論壇與民意－有關停建核四事件討論的分析。2001年第四屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會，台北:
152. 顧長永(1995)。東南亞政府與政治。台北:五南。
153. 顧長永、戴萬平(1998)。新加坡的族群政治－本質與發展。東南亞季刊，3(3)，35-66。

1. 董娟娟(2005)。詮釋新加坡發展的新路徑：監視社會研究的新解與展望。臺灣政治學刊，9(2)，107-150。
2. 黃妍甄(2020)。科技監控下的影響評估－以中國網路警察為例。中國地方自治，73(7)，17-36。
3. 吳乃德(2005)。麵包與愛情：初探台灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊，9(2)，5-39。
4. 葉韻翠(2015)。以領袖為名？由《海峽時報》窺探新加坡紀念地名的文化政治。臺灣國際研究季刊，11(1)，117-138。