跨界移動的環境觀－東南亞籍新移民女性的環境理解方式初探：以泰國、柬埔寨及越南三國為例

Environmental Worldview of Transborders: An Exploratory Case Study on Ways of Environmental Understanding of Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam Female Immigrants

高珮瑤(Pai-Yeow Kaw)；王順美(Shun-Mei Wang)

人與環境的關係 ； 東南亞籍新移民女性 ； 環境理解方式 ； 環境觀 ； relationship between human and environment ； Southeast Asian female immigrants ； ways of environmental understanding ； environmental worldview

台灣東南亞學刊

10卷2期（2015 / 04 / 01）

3 - 40

繁體中文

一個人如何理解環境，也引導了他對待環境的方式。環境觀是人與環境持續動態互動的文化產物，深受一個人成長歷程、當下所處的自然與社會環境，以及個人的性別、種族及文化等要素所影響。東南亞籍新移民女性作為跨界移動的臺灣特殊族群，她們如何理解環境，是本研究關切的核心議題。本研究使用詮釋學取徑，首先實際參與臺北市美仁里舉辦的新移民中文學習班及新北市新店區國際文教中心的新移民活動，透過共學、閒聊、經驗分享等互動方式，了解新移民女性的生活經驗；接著，挑選六位生命故事較為豐富的研究對象並進行深度訪談，且依據研究對象所關心的生活領域聚焦環境議題的範圍及設計訪談問題。研究結果發現，東南亞籍新移民女性無論在理解環境的方式，或對環境關係的定義，都是建立在生存的基礎上。由生存需求出發的環境觀呈現兩種型態：一是視環境為家的「共生」型態，由「動態平衡」、「道德關懷」及「跨界連結」三項要素所構成；二是視環境為資源的「互利」型態，由「平等分配」、「適可而止」及「利益最大化」三項要素所構成。這兩種關係型態相互彌補及制衡，在自我、下一代、社會及環境之間編織了一張維持彼此和諧共處的關係網，驅動她們在臺灣的日常生活實踐。

One's interpretation of environmental worldview is the foundation of how one treats environment. Environmental worldview is a cultural product of continuous dynamic interaction between human and environment. It is largely shaped by factors, such as personal growing experience, the natural and social context one lives in and the gender, race and cultural background of an individual. This study aims to explore the ways of Southeast Asian female immigrants understanding environment with a focus on the Taiwan context. The research framework employs a hermeneutics approach. By having chitchatting, co-learning and experience sharing with female immigrants in the New Immigrants Language Class held by Meiren Vil Church and activities held by New Taipei City International Cultural Center Xindian District, the authors has learnt the life experiences of female immigrants. They have also conducted in-depth interviews with 6 female immigrants who have a wealth of life experiences. The interview questions are framed and set according to issues concerning the interviewees. The result of the study shows that Southeast Asian female immigrants understand environment and define their relationship with environment based on their subsistence. Two patterns of environmental worldview are found. The first pattern is a coexisting relationship that sees environment as home. It is comprised of three elements, namely dynamic equilibrium, moral concern and cross-boundary connection. The second is a mutually-beneficial relationship that sees environment as resources. It consists of three elements, namely equal distribution, enough is enough and benefit maximization. Both patterns are complementary to and counterbalance each other in a network that underpins the harmony between female immigrants, their future generation, the society and environment, enabling them to adapt to the daily life in Taiwan.

1. 王宏仁(2001)。社會階層化下的婚姻移民與國內勞動市場：以越南新娘為例。台灣社會研究季刊，41，99-127。
   連結：
2. 林開忠(2006)。跨界越南女性族群邊界的維持：食物角色的探究。台灣東南亞學刊，3(1)，63-82。
   連結：
3. 楊深坑、洪如玉(2004)。生態中心論的哲學解析及其在生態教育學建構上的蘊義。師大學報：教育類，49(2)，1-18。
   連結：
4. 許美瑞、王瑤芬、林育瑋、黃宜純、賴顯松、黃惠鈴（2006）《建構高職各學群專業能力指標之研究》。網址：http://sun.tchcvs.tc.edu.tw/project/center/files/o_curriculum/%E%AE%B6%E6%94%BF%E7%BE%A4%E7%BE%A4%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.doc （檢索日期：2013 年5 月20 日）
5. White, Lynn (1967) “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.”http://www.uvm.edu/~gflomenh/ENV-NGO-PA395/articles/Lynn-White.pdf. (accessed: 2011-8-30 )
6. Arcury, Thomas, A.,Johnson, Timothy P.,Scollay, Susan J.(1986).Ecological Worldview and Environmental Knowledge: The 'New Environmental Paradigm'.The Journal of Environmental Education,17(4),35-40.
7. Ayupan, Loreta B.,Oliveros, Teresita G.(1994).Filipino Peasant Women in Defence of Life.Close to Home: Women Reconnect Ecology, Health and Development Worldwide,Philadelphia:
8. Benjamin, Geoffrey(1985).In the Long Term: Three Themes in Malayan Cultural Ecology.Cultural Values and Human Ecology in Southeast Asia,Michigan:
9. Bower, Chet A.(1996).The Cultural Dimension of Ecological Literacy.Journal of Environmental Education,27(2),5-10.
10. Brechin, Steven R.,Kempton, Willett(1994).Global Environmentalism: A Challenge to the Postmaterialism Thesis?.Social Science Quarterly,75(2),245-269.
11. Caron, Judi A.(1989).Environmental Perspectives of Blacks: Acceptance of the 'New Environmental Paradigm'.Journal of Environmental Education,20(3),21-26.
12. Clair, Ralf St.(1992).Words for the World: Creating Critical Environmental Literacy for Adults.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,99,27-38.
13. Clover, Darlene E.(ed.)(2004).Global Perspectives in Environmental Adult Education.New York:Peter Lang.
14. Cobern, William W.(2000).Everyday Thought about Nature: A Worldview Investigation of Important Concepts Students Use to Make Sense of Nature with Specific Attention to Science.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
15. Corbett, Julia B.(2005).Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Message.Washington:Island Press.
16. Demeritt, David(2002).What is the 'Social Construction of Nature'? A Typology and Sympathetic Critique.Progress in Human Geography,26(6),767-790.
17. Demeritt, David(1994).The Nature of Metaphors in Cultural Geography and Environmental History.Progress in Human Geography,18(2),163-185.
18. Dunlap, Riley E.(2008).The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use.The Journal of Environmental Education,40(1),3-18.
19. Dunlap, Riley E.,Van Liere, Kent D.(1978).The 'New Environmental Paradigm': A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results.Journal of Environmental Education,9(4),10-19.
20. Fikret Berkes,Colding, Johan,Folke, arl(2000).Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management.Ecological Applications,10(5),1251-1262.
21. Gilligan, Carol、肖巍譯(1993)。不同的聲音：心理學理論與婦女發展。北京:中央編譯。
22. Guo, Xiumei,Marinova, Dora(2006).Environmental Education for Chinese Immigrants in Australia.Sharing Wisdom for Our Future. Environmental Education in Action,Sydney:
23. Inglehart, Ronald(1977).The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
24. Johnson, Cassandra Y.,Bowkerand, J. M.,Cordell, H. Ken(2004).Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior: An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context.Environment and Behavior,36,157-186.
25. Kearney, Michael(1984).World View.Novato:Chandler and Sharp.
26. Kempton, Willett M.,Boster, James S.,Hartley, Jennifer A.(1995).Environmental Values in American Culture.Cambridge:MIT Press.
27. Merriam, Sharan B.(ed.)(2002).Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis.San Francisco:John Wiley and Sons.
28. Milbrath, Lester W.(1985).Culture and the Environment in the United States.Environmental Management,9(2),161-172.
29. Mukherji, Jyotsna(2005).Is Cultural Assimilation Related to Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors?.Advances in Consumer Research,32,415-421.
30. Newman, Penny(1994).Killing Legally with Toxic Waste.Close to Home: Women Reconnect Ecology, Health and Development Worldwide,Philadelphia:
31. Noe, Francis P.,Snow, Rob(1990).Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern.Journal of Environmental Education,21,27-34.
32. Pierce, John C.,Lovrich, Nicholas P., Jr.,Tsurutani, Taketsugu,Abe, Takematsu(1987).Environmental Belief Systems among Japanese and American Elites and Publics.Political Behavior,9(2),139-159.
33. Sauvé, Lucie(1999).Environmental Education between Modernity and Postmodernity: Searching for an Integrating Educational Framework.Canadian Journal of Environmental Education,4,9-35.
34. Shiva, Vandana(1994).The Seed and the Earth: Biotechnology and the Colonization of Regeneration.Close to Home: Women Reconnect Ecology, Health and Development Worldwide,Philadelphia:
35. Snively, Gloria,Corsiglia, John(2001).Rediscovering Indigenous Science: Implications for Science Education.Science Education,85,6-34.
36. Stapp, William B.(1969).The Concept of Environmental Education.The Journal of Environmental Education,1(1),33-36.
37. Tuan, Yi-Fu、潘桂成譯(1977)。經驗透視中的空間和地方。臺北:國立編譯館。
38. Victor, Corral-Verdugo,Irene, Armendariz L.(2000).The 'New Environmental Paradigm' in a Mexican Community.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(3),25-31.
39. Walter, Pierre(2009).Philosophies of Adult Environmental Education.Adult Education Quarterly,60(1),3-25.
40. Warren, Karen J.(ed.)(1996).Ecological Feminist Philosophies.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
41. Warren, Karen J.(ed.)(1997).Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
42. 王從恕(2001)。西方環境倫理概要。科學教育月刊，241，26-34。
43. 夏曉鵑(2002)。流離尋岸：資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象。臺北:台灣社會研究。
44. 徐進鈺編(2006)。跨界流離：全球化下的移民與移工。臺北:臺灣社會研究社。
45. 高佩瑤、王順美(2014)。日常環境風險因應的經驗學習歷程。台灣教育社會學研究，14(1)，47-91。
46. 高宣揚(2002)。布爾迪厄Bourdieu。臺北:生智。
47. 張培倫(2009)。關於原住民族知識研究的一些反思。台灣原住民研究論叢，5，25-53。
48. 梁曉儉(2006)。東方宗教思想與生態環境保護。世界宗教研究，2006(1)，8-14。
49. 陳定銘(2008)。台灣非營利組織在新移民婦女照顧。2008 年全球非政府組織國際學術研討會，嘉義:
50. 傅麗玉(1999)。新竹縣國民中小學自然科學教師及非自然科學教師之世界觀研究。科學教育學刊，7(2)，177-198。
51. 楊冠政(2011)。環境倫理學概論（上）。臺北:大開資訊。
52. 楊冠政(2002)。環境倫理─環境教育的終極目標。環境教育學刊，1，1-12。
53. 楊雅鷹(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，臺北市立大學環境教育研究所。

1. 陳志賢(2016)。新移民家庭諮商所需之多元文化諮商能力探討。輔導季刊，52(2)，5-12。