華語篇章中的攝取角度

Perspectives in Chinese Discourse

10.6393/JCLT.200812.0047

張榮興(Jung-Hsing Chang)

攝取角度 ； 心理空間理論 ； 隱喻 ； 華語篇章 ； 華語閱讀教學 ； perspective ； Mental Space Theory ； metaphor ； Chinese discourse ； teaching Chinese reading

華語文教學研究

5卷2期（2008 / 12 / 01）

47 - 67

繁體中文

一個情境(situation)可以從多個不同角度來加以陳述(Renkema 2004:126-130; Linell 2002)，本文以心理空間理論爲基礎(Fauconnier, 1994, 1997; Fauconnier & Turner, 2002)，以聯合報「最短篇」的篇章爲分析語料，來探討讀者閱讀文章時因爲攝取角度的不同，對故事理解的心理空間運作模式。本文中的故事可由對照的攝取角度來探討讀者對於文章理解的運作模式，這些對照的攝取角度包括了故事的順時與逆時角度、真實與虛擬世界的角度、成人與出生嬰兒的角度、以及生與死的攝取角度。

A situation can be presented from a number of different perspectives (Renkema 2004:126-130; Linell 2002). This paper takes the 'shortest stories' from the United Daily News as examples to illustrate how a Chinese story can be described under a particular perspective and how such perspective has an impact on the interpretation of a story, within the framework of Mental Space Theory (Fauconnier, 1994, 1997; Fauconnier & Turner, 2002). It has been shown in the paper that a story can be described and accounted for from different points of view, for example, from the perspectives of chronological vs. non-chronological order, real world vs. virtual world, adult vs. new born baby, and the living world vs. the world of death.

1. Blakemore, Diane.(1987).Semantic Constraints on Relevance.Oxford:Blackwell.
2. Dirven, René,Marjolijn Verspoor.(1998).Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
3. Fauconnier, Gilles.(1994).Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. Fauconnier, Gilles.(1997).Mappings in Thought and Language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. Fauconnier, Gilles,Mark Turner.(2002).The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind`s Hidden Complexities.New York:Basic Books.
6. Fillmore, Charles J.,The Linguistic Society of Korea(ed.)(1982).Linguistics in the Morning Calm.Seoul:Hanshin.
7. Glucksberg, S.,B. Keysar.,A. Ortony(ed.)(1993).Metaphor and Thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
8. Graumann, C.,C. Sommer(1988).Perspective structure in language production and comprehension.Journal of Language and Social Psychology,7,192-212.
9. Kövecses, Zoltán.(2006).Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
10. Krashen, Stephen D.(2004).The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research.Westport, Connecticut:A Member of the Greenwood Publishing Group.
11. Langacker, Ronald W.(1987).Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
12. Lee, David.(2001).Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
13. Linell, Per.,Carl F.,Graumann Werner Kallmeyer(ed.)(2002).Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
14. Mushin, Ilana.,Jean-Pierre Koenig(ed.)(1998).Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap.Stanford:CSLI.
15. Pinker, Steven.(2004).The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature.New York:Penguin Group.
16. Renkema, Jan.(2004).Introduction to Discourse Studies.Amsterdam:John Benjamins publishing Company.
17. Saeed, John.(2003).Semantics.Oxford:Blackwell.
18. Sanders, José,Gisela Redeker.,Gilles Fauconnier,Eve Sweetser(ed.)(1996).Spaces, Worlds and Grammar.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
19. Slobin, Dan. I.,J Gumperz,J. John,S. C. Levinson(ed.)(1996).Rethinking Linguistic Relativity.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. 張榮興、黃惠華(2006)。從心理空間理論看「最短篇」小說中之隱喻。華語文教學研究，3(1)，117-133。
21. 張榮興、黃惠華(2005)。心理空間理論與「梁祝十八相送」之隱喻研究。語言暨語言學，6(4)，681-705。

1. 陳木青(2022)。城市之餘：論劉克襄《野狗之丘》、《虎地貓》的地理空間與生命關懷。東華漢學，36，205-241。
2. 張羣(2013)。語用因素在語言溝通和華語教學上的重要性：《語用研究與華語教學》書評。華語文教學研究，10(1)，107-113。
3. 張榮興(2012)。從心理空間理論解讀古代 「多重來源單一目標投射」篇章中的隱喻。華語文教學研究，9(1)，1-22。
4. 張榮興(2016)。從心理空間理論解析〈己亥雜詩─第五首〉的隱喻。華語文教學研究，13(3)，123-142。
5. 張榮興、林建宏(2013)。從心理空間理論來分析華語的臨時量詞。華語文教學研究，10(4)，81-108。
6. 張榮興、吳佩晏(2010)。心理空間理論與《論語》中的隱喻分析。華語文教學研究，7(1)，97-124。