華語隱性賓語的理解與限制

Interpretations and Constraints of Implicit Objects in Chinese

10.6393/JCLT.200906.0039

張群(Chun Chang)；連金發(Chin-Fa Lien)

隱性論元 ； 華語 ； 世界知識 ； 訊息結構 ； 構式效應 ； 動詞屬性 ； implicit object ； Chinese ； world knowledge ； information structure ； construction effect ； verbal properties

華語文教學研究

6卷1期（2009 / 06 / 01）

39 - 58

繁體中文

華語及物動詞的賓語在某種情況下會隱而不顯。在共同的認知與背景知識前提下(Fillmore & Atkins 1992)，說話者與聽話者可用兩種認知機置，即語意的「可預測性」(predictability)與「可恢復性」(recoverability)，來理解句法表層上隱去的賓語。大體而言有三類情況可以促成隱性賓語：世界知識（認知背景）、訊息結構（涉及訊息焦點）和構式效應（語意塑造）。本文根據「構式語法」(Construction Grammar)的理論模式(Goldberg 1995; Jackendoff 2002)，同時考慮動詞詞彙語意的特性(Goldberg 2005; Mittwoch 2005)，針對華語隱性賓語和各種構式的關係，探究其語意理解與限制。

Issues regarding interpretations and constraints of implicit objects in Chinese furnish intriguing topics for in-depth probe. On the premise of sharing the same cognitive and background knowledge (Fillmore & Atkins 1992), speakers and hearers can construe missing arguments in overt syntactic levels in terms of two cognitive mechanisms, viz., semantic predictability and recoverability. The distribution of implicit objects can be interpreted on the basis of three conditions: (a) world knowledge (e.g., cognitive frame), (b) information structure (e.g., information focus), and (c) construction effect (e.g., semantic coercion). Based on the theoretical proposals of Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995; Jackendoff 2002) and verbal property (Goldberg 2005; Mittwoch 2005), this study explores the semantic interpretations and constraints of implicit objects in conjunction with kinds of constructions.

1. Cheng, Robert Liang-Wei.(1985).A Comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin.Language,61(2),352-377.
2. Culicover, Peter W.(1999).Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
3. Fillmore, Charles. J.,B. T. S. Atkins.,A. Lehrer (ed.),E. Kittay.(1992).Frames, Fields, and Contrasts.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Fillmore. Charles J.(1986).Pragmatically controlled Zero Anaphora.Proceedings of the 12nd Berkeley Linguistics Society,12,95-107.
5. Goldberg, Adele E.(2006).Constructions at Work: the nature of generalization in Language.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
6. Goldberg, Adele E.(1995).Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
7. Goldberg, Adele E.,N. Erteschik-Shir (eds.),T. Rapoport (eds.)(2005).The Syntax of Aspect.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Her, One-Soon.(1991).Topic as a grammatical function in Chinese.Lingua,84,1-23.
9. Hopper, P. J.,S. A. Thompson.(1980).Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.Language,56,251-295.
10. Huang, C.-T. James.(1987).Remarks on empty categories in Chinese.Linguistic Inquiry,18,321-337.
11. Huang, C.-T. James.,O. Jaeggli (eds.),K. Safir (eds.)(1989).The Null Subject Parameter.D. Reidel. Dordrecht.
12. Huang, C.-T. James.,R. Freidin (ed.)(1991).Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar.Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press.
13. Jackendoff, Ray.(2002).Foundation of Languages: .Brain, Meaning, Evolution.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
14. Jackendoff, Ray.(1997).The Architecture of the Language Faculty.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
15. Jackendoff, Ray.(1991).Parts and boundary.Cognition,41,9-45.
16. Jackendoff, Ray.(1996).The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,14,305-354.
17. Jackendoff, Ray.(1997).Twistin' the night away.Language,73,534-559.
18. Lambrecht, K.(1994).Information Structure and Sentence Form.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Lee, Chia-Chun.(2008).Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.
20. Mittwoch, Anita.,Nomi, Erteschiki-Shir (eds.),Tova Rapoport. (eds.)(2005).The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
21. Rosch, Eleanor,Carolyn Mervis,Wayne Carey,David Johnson,Penny Boyes-Braem.(1976).Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8,382-439.
22. Smith, Carlota.(1991).The Parameter of Aspect.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
23. Thompson Ellen.(2006).The Structure of Bounded Events.Linguistic Inquiry,37,211-228.
24. Tsao, Feng-Fu,Ya-Wen, Jiang.(1999).The effect of basic-level category in Mandarin Lexicon.paper presented at Workshop on Chinese Lexical Development.
25. Wang, William S-Y.(1979).Competing changes as a cause of residue.Language,45(1),9-25.
26. 王力(1954)。中國現代語法。北京:中華書局。
27. 王士元、連金發(2004)。中國語言學論叢。北京:北京語言大學出版社。
28. 朱德熙(1982)。語法講義。北京:商務印書館。
29. 呂叔湘(2004)。現代漢語八百詞。北京:商務印書館。
30. 張郇慧、連金發、蘇以文(2008)。一步一腳印：鄭良偉教授榮退論文集。臺北:文鶴出版有限公司。
31. 張群(2007)。華語反覆性事件構式“V＋來＋V＋去”的探索：從構式語法的角度談起。華語文教學研究，4(1)，31-53。
32. 曹逢甫(2000)。台式日語和臺灣國語－百年來發生在臺灣的兩個語言接觸的實例。漢學研究，18，273-297。
33. 連金發(2005)。華語名前形容詞的語義探索。華語文教學研究，2(1)，1-24。
34. 連金發、董忠司編(1998)。試論台語泛意詞‘拍phah4'。臺灣語言及其教學國際研討會論文集，新竹:
35. 湯廷池(1988)。爲漢語動詞試定界說。清華學報，18(1)，43-69。
36. 趙元任(1994)。中國話的文法。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
37. 戴浩一(2007)。中文構詞與句法的概念結構。華語文教學研究，4(1)，1-30。

1. 張羣(2012)。語言的形式與功能：《華語句法新論（上）》書評。華語文教學研究，9(4)，115-118。
2. 張羣(2013)。語用因素在語言溝通和華語教學上的重要性：《語用研究與華語教學》書評。華語文教學研究，10(1)，107-113。