题名

如何理解中文語法-從功能詞說起

并列篇名

How to Make Sense of Chinese?-Start with Chinese Function Words

作者

劉美君(Mei-Chun Liu)

关键词

功能語法學 ; 中文功能詞 ; 形意搭配 ; 中文的語性 ; 語法教學 ; Functional Syntax ; Chinese grammar ; Chinese function words ; form-meaning association ; pre-nominal DE ; post-verbal DE ; degree marker HEN

期刊名称

華語文教學研究

卷期/出版年月

12卷3期(2015 / 09 / 01)

页次

31 - 52

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

人有個性,語言有語性。本文試圖從外語人士的角度來檢視中文語法,到底中文有什麼特殊之處?中文幾個重要卻難解的問題,如何能清楚地說明並落實在教學中?本文以功能語法學派所提出的「形意搭配」原理,來剖析語法形式所要表達的溝通功能,並透過中英文的比較,主張要把中文學通,必須了解中文獨特的形意搭配原則,並針對功能詞「的」、「得」和「很」字的用法提出一個基於形式搭配功能的新論點,有別於過去的研究論述。這些功能詞的用法雖多,但位置和形式只有一種,核心功能也只有一種。對語言學習者而言,中文功能詞的形意搭配是最重要的課題之一,了解功能詞的核心用法是將中文語法學通的第一步。

英文摘要

Grammar is meant for communication and grammar has to make sense! The Chinese grammar is featured by its form-function mapping principles that are crucial in understanding the unique “character” of Chinese. This study aims to explore the form-meaning mapping relations behind three commonly used function words, the pre-nominal DE (的), the post-verbal DE (得), and the default degree marker HEN (很). The three function words are re-defined by associating their relatively-fixed formal properties with their prototypical functions. The pre-nominal DE is used as a marker of pre-Head modification or specification, which is presuppositional in nature; the post-verbal DE marks a post-verbal complement by affixing to the verb; the degree marker HEN is a signal or trigger of evaluative predication. The proposed analyses are able to account for the various uses of the three markers and find answers to previously puzzling questions. The study shows that a function-based approach to Chinese grammar may help delimit the core grammatical roles of the three markers and explain their diverse uses and constraints in a well-motivated manner.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Chao, Yuen Ren(1968).A Grammar of Spoken Chinese.Oakland, CA:University of California Press.
  2. Chappell, Hilary,Thomspon, Sandra A.(1992).The semantics and pragmatics of associative de in Mandarin discourse.Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale,21,199-229.
  3. Givón, T.(1993).English Grammar: A Function-based Introduction.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Co..
  4. Goldberg, Adele(1995).Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  5. Hashimoto, Anne(1966).Columbus, Ohio,Ohio State University.
  6. Huang, C. T. James(1984).On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.Linguistic Inquiry,15,531-574.
  7. Li, Charles N.,Thompson, Sandra A.(1989).Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar.Oakland, CA:University of California Press.
  8. Li, Charles N.,Thompson, Sandra A.(1976).Subject and topic: a new typology of language.Subject and Topic,New York:
  9. Liu, Mei-chun(2010).Emergence of the indefinite article: discourse evidence for the grammaticalization of YIGE in spoken Mandarin.Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research,Amsterdam:
  10. Liu, Mei-chun,Chen, Yuwen,Ni, Hsiaoyung,Chang, Weichin(2012).A study of semantic-to-morphological sequencing of Mandarin motion verbs.The 20th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-20),Hong Kong:
  11. Liu, Mei-chun,Hu, Chia-yin,Tsai, Hsin-shan,Chou, Shu-ping(2014).The proto-motion event schema: integrating lexical semantics and morphological sequencing.Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  12. Paris, Marie-Claude(1988).Durational complements and verb copying in Chinese.Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies,28,423-439.
  13. Paris, Marie-Claude(1979).Nominalization in Mandarin Chinese: The Morpheme "de" and the "shi"..."de" Constructions.Paris:Universite Paris VII, departement de recherches linguistiques.
  14. Sun, Chaofen(2014).The pragmatics of the Chinese nominal marker de.Chinese Language and Discourse,5(1),7-24.
  15. Sun, Chaofen(2012).Chinese grammar, language teaching, and the nominal marker de.The 24th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics,San Francisco:
  16. Tai, James H-Y.(1985).Temporal sequence and Chinese word order.Iconicity in Syntax,Amsterdam:
  17. Tai, James H-Y.(2003).Cognitive relativism: resultative construction in Chinese.Language and Linguistics,4,301-316.
  18. Tsao, Feng-fu(1989).Comparison in Chinese: a topic-comment approach.Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies,19,151-189.
  19. Tsao, Feng-fu(1979).A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step Toward Discourse Analysis.Taipei:Student Book Co..
  20. Xing, Janet(ed.)(2012).Newest Trends in the Study of Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  21. 石毓智(2000)。論「的」的語法功能的同一性。世界漢語教學,1,16-27。
  22. 朱德熙(1961)。中國語文,1961(12),1-15。
  23. 劉美君(2012)。英文文法有道理:Making Sense of English。臺北=Taipei:聯經出版社=Linking Publishing。
被引用次数
  1. (2022)。手勢與玩偶線索對幼兒代名詞推論之影響。教育學刊,59,35-76。