Multiple Scaffolding Mechanisms for L2 Syntactic Processing: An Event-related Potential Study

二語語法處理的多重支援機制：事件相關電位研究

陳柏亨(Po-Heng CHEN)；葉遲(Chih YEH)；呂佳蓉(Chiarung LU)；謝舒凱(Shu-Kai HSIEH)；周泰立(Tai-Li CHOU)；蘇以文(Lily I-Wen SU)；李佳霖(Chia-Lin LEE)

second language acquisition ； language lateralization ； hemispheric differences ； divided visual-field ； event-related potential (ERP) ； 二語學習 ； 語言側化 ； 腦半球差異 ； 分視野 ； 事件相關電位

華語文教學研究

15卷2期（2018 / 06 / 01）

63 - 93

英文

Native-like cognitive-neural mechanisms for syntactic processing have been shown to be less available for L2 learners. To compensate, learners may rely on lexical-semantic processing or the non-dominant hemisphere. To investigate these scaffolding effects, this study combined divided visual-field (VF) and Event-Related Potential (ERP) techniques to assess L2 learners’ brain responses across the left and right hemispheres (LH and RH). Participants judged the grammaticality of Chinese two-word phrases starting with a classifier. Our data showed that, compared to native speakers, L2 learners were less accurate in grammaticality judgments and elicited qualitatively different brain responses even to correct trials. Replicating our previous findings on left-lateralized structural processing in native speakers, native participants in this present study showed a P600 grammaticality effect with RVF/LH presentation only. L2 learners showed remarkable inter-subject variability in brain responses, and as a consequence, showed no statistically reliable ERP grammaticality effects. However, correlational analysis on individual learners' brain responses and behavioral language performance revealed important correlations. Specifically, better language performance was associated with smaller RVF/LH N400 grammaticality effects and smaller LVF/RH P600 grammaticality effects. Quartile split based on participants' language performance showed striking patterns, showing from bottom quartile to top quartile a gradual shift from an N400 grammaticality effect to a P600 grammaticality effect in the RVF/LH condition, and a P600 grammaticality effect to a later negativity effect in the LVF/RH condition. These results thus highlight the transitional roles of scaffolding mechanisms in language learning and suggest in particular that higher L2 syntactic processing co-occurs with less reliance on lexical-semantic processing in the dominant LH and disengagement of structural analysis from the non-dominant RH.

二語學習者往往無法以母語者所使用的認知神經資源來處理句法資訊；為了彌補其不足，學習者常以處理語意的方式來理解句法，或是尋求語言非優勢腦的協助。為更加瞭解這些替代處理模式，本研究結合分視野呈現以及事件相關電位來量測華語學習者左右半腦的反應。在實驗中，受試者需判斷以量詞為首的雙詞短語是否符合華語的語法結構。實驗結果顯示，與母語者相比，華語學習者不僅正確率較低，即便是在正確回答的題目裡，也誘發了和母語者不同本質的腦波反應。母語者只有在右視野呈現（左腦優先處理時）有顯著的P600效果，複製了以往母語者的語法處理偏向左側化的研究發現。由於二語學習者的腦波反應呈現很大的個體差異，因此整體而言，華語學習組並無呈現任何統計顯著的效果。然而，當我們進一步對學習組的腦波與華語行為表現做相關分析時發現，行為表現較佳的學習者在右視野呈現時誘發較小的N400 效果，在左視野呈現（右腦優先處理時）也誘發較小的P600 效果。依據學習組受試者的華語表現將他們分成四等份後，腦波反應清楚呈現出以下的變化：隨著華語表現的進展，右視野呈現（左腦優先處理時）誘發的N400效果會逐漸轉為P600效果，而左視野呈現（右腦優先處理時）誘發的P600效果則逐漸轉為晚期出現的負向波效果。因此，我們的實驗結果不僅支持了優勢腦中詞彙語意處理以及非優勢腦中語法結構處理這兩種鷹架機制的存在，更點出其在語言學習時所扮演的過渡角色，顯示二語學習者會逐漸減弱對這兩種鷹架機制的倚賴，以提升其二語語法的處理能力。

1. Berardi, Nicoletta,Fiorentini, Adriana(1997).Interhemispheric Transfer of Spatial and Temporal Frequency Information.Advances in Psychology
2. Bourne, Victoria J.(2006).The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations.Laterality,11(4),373-393.
3. Chen, Keh-Jiann,Huang, Chu-Ren,Chang, Li-Ping,Hsu, Hui-Li(1996).Sinica corpus: Design methodology for balanced corpora.Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
4. Chen, Lang,Shu, Hua,Liu, Youyi,Zhao, Jingjing,Li, Ping(2007).ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,10(2),161-174.
5. Chen, Min-Hsin,Lee, Chia-Lin(2015).Hemispheric differences in processing word class information-ERP evidence from Chinese.Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language,Chicago, Illinois:
6. Chen, Po-Heng,Chen, Min-Hsin,Lee, Chia-Lin(2017).Inter-hemispheric communication ability modulates the laterality of P600 responses to syntactic category violations in healthy young and older adults.Psychophysiology,56(Supplement 1),S73.
7. Cohen, Laurent,Lehéricy, Stéphane,Henry, Carole,Bourgeois, Marie,Larroque, Christine,Sainte-Rose, Christian,Dehaene, Stanislas,Hertz-Pannier, Lucie(2004).Learning to read without a left occipital lobe: Righthemispheric shift of visual word form area.Annals of Neurology,56(6),890-894.
8. Dehaene, Stanislas,Dupoux, Emmanuel,Mehler, Jacques,Cohen, Laurent,Paulesu, Eraldo,Perani, Daniela,van de Moortele, Pierre-Francois,Lehéricy, Stéphane,Le Bihan, Denis(1997).Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language.Neuroreport,8(17),3809-3815.
9. Ding, Guosheng,Perry, Conrad,Peng, Danling,Ma, Lin,Li, Dejun,Xu, Shiyong,Luo, Qian,Xu, Duo,Yang, Jing(2003).Neural mechanisms underlying semantic and orthographic processing in Chinese-English bilinguals.Neuroreport,14(12),1557-1562.
10. Dowens, Margaret Gillon,Vergara, Marta,Barber, Horacio A.,Carreiras, Manuel(2010).Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,22(8),1870-1887.
11. Ferreira, Fernanda,Bailey, Karl G.D.,Ferraro, Vittoria(2002).Goodenough representations in language comprehension.Current Directions in Psychological Science,11(1),11-15.
12. Hagoort, Peter,Brown, Colin,Groothusen, Jolanda(1993).The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing.Language and Cognitive Processes,8(4),439-483.
13. Hahne, Anja(2001).What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,30(3),251-266.
14. Hahne, Anja,Friederici, Angela D.(2001).Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,4(2),123-141.
15. Hamilton, Roy H.,Chrysikou, Evangelia G.,Coslett, Branch(2011).Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation.Brain and Language,118(1-2),40-50.
16. Hodges, John R.,Patterson, Karalyn(1997).Semantic memory disorders.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1(2),68-72.
17. Hoptman, Matthew J.,Davidson, Richard J.(1994).How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact?.Psychological Bulletin,116(2),195-219.
18. Hugdahl, Kenneth(ed.)(2003).Experimental Methods in Neuropsychology.Boston, MA:Springer US.
19. Karbe, Hans,Herholz, Karl,Halber, Marco,Heiss, Wolf-Dieter(1998).Collateral inhibition of transcallosal activity facilitates functional brain asymmetry.Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism,18(10),1157-1161.
20. Kemmer, Laura,Coulson, Seana,Kutas, Marta(2014).Grammatical number agreement processing using the visual half-field paradigm: An event-related brain potential study.International Journal of Psychophysiology,91(2),88-103.
21. Kroll, Judith F.,Dussias, Paola E.,Bice, Kinsey,Perrotti, Lauren(2015).Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain.Annual Review of Linguistics,1,377-394.
22. Kuperberg, Gina R.(2007).Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax.Brain Research,1146,23-49.
23. Kutas, Marta,Federmeier, Kara D.(2011).Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).Annual Review of Psychology,62,621-647.
24. Lee, Chia-Lin,Federmeier, Kara D.(2015).It's all in the family: Brain asymmetry and syntactic processing of word class.Psychological Science,26(7),997-1005.
25. Leonard, Matthew K.,Brown, Timothy T.,Travis, Katherine E.,Gharapetian, Lusineh,Hagler, Donald J., Jr,Dale, Anders M.,Elman, Jeffrey L.,Halgren, Eric(2010).Spatiotemporal dynamics of bilingual word processing.NeuroImage,49(4),3286-3294.
26. Lin, Wan-Ting,Weng, Chen-Hsiang,Chen, Min-Hsin,Tseng, Wen-Yih Isaac,Goh, Joshua Oon Soo,Lee, Chia-Lin(2017).Linking white matter integrity to syntactic category processing-an ERP and DTI study.Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language,Baltimore, Maryland.:
27. Meulman, Nienke,Stowe, Laurie A.,Sprenger, Simone A.,Bresser, Moniek,Schmid, Monika S.(2014).An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail?.Frontiers in Psychology,5,1072.
28. Oldfield, Richard C.(1971).The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia,9(1),97-113.
29. Osterhout, Lee,Holcomb, Phillip J.(1992).Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory and Language,31(6),785-806.
30. Osterhout, Lee,McLaughlin, Judith,Pitkänen, Ilona,Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl,Molinaro, Nicola(2006).Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing.Language Learning,56,199-230.
31. Osterhout, Lee,Poliakov, Andrew,Inoue, Kayo,McLaughlin, Judith,Valentine, Geoffrey,Pitkanen, Ilona,Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl,Hirschensohn, Julia(2008).Second-language learning and changes in the brain.Journal of Neurolinguistics,21(6),509-521.
32. Qi, Zhenghan,Han, Michelle,Garel, Keri,Chen, Ee San,Gabrieli, John D. E.(2015).White-matter structure in the right hemisphere predicts Mandarin Chinese learning success.Journal of Neurolinguistics,33,14-28.
33. Qi, Zhenghan,Han, Michelle,Wang, Yunxin,de los Angeles, Carlo,Liu, Qi,Garel, Keri,Chen, Ee San,Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan,Gabrieli, John D. E.,Perrachione, Tyler K.(2017).Speech processing and plasticity in the right hemisphere predict real-world foreign language learning in adults.Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language,Baltimore, Maryland:
34. Qian, Zhiying,Garnsey, Susan M.(2016).A sheet of coffee: An event-related brain potential study of the processing of classifier-noun sequences in English and Mandarin.Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,31(6),761-784.
35. Rossi, Sonja,Gugler, Manfred F.,Friederici, Angela D.,Hahne, Anja(2006).The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18(12),2030-2048.
36. Squire, Larry R.,Zola, Stuart M.(1996).Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,93(24),13515-13522.
37. Tanner, Darren,Inoue, Kayo,Osterhout, Lee(2014).Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,17(2),277-293.
38. Tanner, Darren,McLaughlin, Judith,Herschensohn, Julia,Osterhout, Lee(2013).Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,16(2),367-382.
39. Tanner, Darren,Van Hell, Janet G.(2014).ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing.Neuropsychologia,56,289-301.
40. Ullman, Michael T.(2001).The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,4(2),105-122.
41. Van Hell, Janet G.,Tokowicz, Natasha(2010).Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels.Second Language Research,26(1),43-74.
42. Van Heuven, Walter J. B.,Dijkstra, Ton(2010).Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support for psycholinguistic models.Brain Research Reviews,64(1),104-122.
43. Weber-Fox, Christine M.,Neville, Helen J.(1996).Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8(3),231-256.
44. Weng, Yi-Lun,Chen, Min-Hsin,Lee, Chia-Lin(2017).Left-lateralized syntactic category processing is modulated by interhemispheric inhibition in healthy young right-handers with familial sinistrality background.Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language,Baltimore, Maryland.: