母語背景對華語學習者華語短文閱讀理解與詞類訊息處理的影響

The Influence of Chinese L2 Learners' First Language on Their Comprehension of Chinese Short Passages and Processing of Word-Class Information

官英華(Ying-Hua GUAN)

母語背景 ； 眼動行為分析 ； 華語短文閱讀理解 ； 詞類 ； 廣義線性混合模型 ； analysis on eye-movement behavior ； Chinese passage reading comprehension ； generalized linear mixed model ； L1 background ； word class

華語文教學研究

20卷3期（2023 / 09 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文;英文

過往有關華語學習者閱讀的研究曾探討過學習者在字詞辨識、唸讀能力、涉及特定語法的句子理解以及閱讀策略使用等方面的差異，然而有關學習者篇章閱讀的認知歷程研究似乎仍較少。本文以初探研究的角度出發，探討中級程度華語學習者的母語背景如何影響他們閱讀華語短文的理解表現，並分析他們的眼動行為，以檢視他們篇章閱讀和詞類訊息處理的歷程。實驗以30位歐美和30位日本華語程度為中級的大學生為對象，要求他們閱讀4篇、每篇長度為400字且難度平均在中級水平的華語短文，並將他們的閱讀理解表現和眼動行為與華語母語的大學生相比較。研究結果顯示母語背景對華語學習者的閱讀認知歷程有顯著的影響，雖然歐美和日本學生在答題正確率上無顯著差異，但眼動數據顯示與日本學生相較起來，歐美學生閱讀速度較慢、平均凝視時間較長、跳視距離較短、回視率較低。此外眼動數據也揭示了詞類對華語學習者注意力資源分配的影響。以實詞和虛詞的分類來看，僅發現日本學生在虛詞的回視進入率顯著高於實詞。以名詞、動詞、副詞和連接詞四大詞類來看，則發現與名詞相比，歐美學生需花較多時間處理副詞和連接詞，而日本學生則需較多時間處理副詞、連接詞和動詞。

Previous research on Chinese as a second language (CSL) learners' reading has investigated differences in learners' word recognition, reading fluency and accuracy, comprehension of sentences involving specific grammar, and the use of reading strategies. However, there appears to be relatively less research on the cognitive processes of learners' reading of extended texts. This study investigated how intermediate-level CSL learners' L1 background affects their reading comprehension performance when reading Chinese short passages and analyzed learners' eye-movement behavior to examine how they read texts and processed word class information during the reading processes. Thirty European and thirty Japanese intermediate-level CSL college students were recruited for an eye-tracking experiment, in which participants were required to read four 400-character passages that matched their Chinese reading proficiency level. Another thirty Taiwanese college students were recruited as the control group for this experiment. The reading performance and eye movements of all participants were analyzed and compared. The results indicated that students' L1 background had significant effects on their cognitive processes in reading. While the comprehension accuracy rates of European and Japanese students did not significantly differ, the eye-movement data showed that European students read substantially slower, had on average longer fixation durations, shorter saccade lengths, and lower regress-in rates compared to their Japanese counterparts. Moreover, students' L1 also influenced their attention allocation when processing word class information. It was found that Japanese students had a higher regress-in rate on function words than on content words, while European students did not show a difference in their eye movements for function and content words. When comparing processing time among the word classes, the results showed that European students spent significantly more time processing adverbs and conjunctions than nouns. On the other hand, Japanese students paid more attention to adverbs, conjunctions, and verbs compared to nouns.

1. 官英華, Ying-hua(2020)。以眼動實驗探索歐美、日本與臺灣大學生閱讀漢字詞時，利用字形、字音線索的差異。華語文教學研究，17(2)，91-130。
   連結：
2. 柯華葳, Hwa-wei,陳明蕾, Ming-lei,廖家寧, Chia-ning(2005)。詞頻，詞彙類型與眼球運動型態：來自篇章閱讀的證據。中華心理學刊，47(4)，381-398。
   連結：
3. 詹益綾, Yi-Ling,柯華葳, Hwa-wei(2010)。由眼動資料探討連接詞在閱讀歷程中扮演的角色。教育心理學報，42(2)，297-316。
   連結：
4. 蔡介立, Jie-li,顏妙璇, Miao-hsuan,汪勁安, Chin-an(2005)。眼球移動測量及在華語閱讀研究之應用。應用心哩研究，28，91-104。
   連結：
5. Bernhardt, Elizabeth(2011).Understanding advanced second-language reading.New York:Routledge.
6. Berns, Margie(ed.)(2010).Concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
7. Carpenter, Patricia A.,Just, Marcel A.(1983).What your eyes do while your mind is reading.Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes,New York:
8. Cook, Vivian,Bassetti, Benedetta(2005).An introduction to researching second language writing systems.Second Language Writing Systems,Clevedon:
9. Cop, Uschi,Drieghe, Denis,Duyck, Wouter(2015).Eye Movement Patterns in Natural Reading: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Reading of a Novel.PLoS One,10(8),e0134008.
10. Cummins, James(1979).Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children.Review of Educational Research,49(2),222-251.
11. Dikker, Suzanne,Rabagliati, Hugh,Farmer, Thomas A.,Pylkkänen, Liina(2010).Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality.Psychological Science,21(5),629-634.
12. Farmer, Thomas. A.,Yan, Shaorong,Bicknell, Klinton,Tanenhaus, Michael K.(2015).Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,41(4),958-976.
13. Fromkin, Victoria,Rodman, Robert,Hyams, Nian(2017).An introduction to language.Boston:Cengage.
14. Furtner, Marco R.,Rauthmann, John F.,Sachse, Pierre(2009).Nomen est omen: Investigating the dominance of nouns in word comprehension with eye movement analyses.Advances in Cognitive Psychology,5,91-104.
15. Godfroid, Aline,Boers, Frank,Housen, Alex(2013).An Eye for Words.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,35(3),483-517.
16. Holmqvist, Kenneth,Nystrom, Marcus,Andersson, Richard,Dewhurst, Richard,Jarodzka, Halszka,Van De Weijer, Joost(2011).Eye tracking A comprehensive guide to methods, paradigms, and measures.New York:Oxford University Press.
17. Just, Marcel A.,Carpenter, Patricai A.(1980).A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87,329-354.
18. Klein, Christoph,Ettinger, Ulrich(2019).Eye Movement Research An Introduction to its Scientific Foundations and applications.Switzerland:Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
19. Mohamed, Ayman A.(2017).Exposure Frequency in L2 Reading.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,40(2),269-293.
20. Mulder, Evelien,van de Ven, Marco,Segers, Eliane,Krepel, Alexander,de Bree, Elise H.,de Jong, Peter F.,Verhoeven, Ludo(2020).Word-to-text integration in English as a second language reading comprehension.Reading and Writing,34(4),1049-1087.
21. Osterhout, Lee,Allen, Mark,McLaughlin, Judith(2002).Words in the brain: lexical determinants of word-induced brain activity.Journal of Neurolinguistics,15(3),171-187.
22. Pan, Jinger,Yan, Ming,Richter, Eike M.,Shu, Hua,Kliegl, Reinhold(2021).The Beijing Sentence Corpus: A Chinese sentence corpus with eye movement data and predictability norms.Behavior Research Methods
23. Perfetti, Charles A.,Liu, Ying,Tan, Li-Hai(2002).How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach.Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language,Hong Kong:
24. Radach, Ralph,Kennedy, Alan(2004).Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,16(1/2),3-26.
25. Rayner, Keith(2009).Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.Journal of Eye Movement Research,2(5),1-10.
26. Rayner, Keith(1998).Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124(3),372-422.
27. Rayner, Keith,Liversedge, Simon P.(2004).Visual and linguistic processing during eye fixations in reading.The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action Eye Movements and the Visual World,New York:
28. Schmauder, A. René,Morris, Robin K.,Poynor, David V.(2000).Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations.Memory & Cognition,28(7),1098-1108.
29. Tong, Xiuhong,Kwan, Joyce L. Y.,Tong, Xiuli,Deacon, S. Hélène(2021).How Chinese–English bilingual fourth graders draw on syntactic awareness in reading comprehension: Within‐ and cross‐language effects.Reading Research Quarterly,57(2),409-429.
30. Vigliocco, Gabriella,Vinson, David P.,Druks, Judit,Barber, Horacio,Cappa, Stefano F.(2011).Nouns and verbs in the brain: a review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,35(3),407-426.
31. 白學軍, Xue-jun,李馨, Xin,閻國利, Guoli(2015)。漢語閱讀眼動控制：20年研究的總結。心理發展與教育，31(1)，85-91。
32. 孫崇飛, Chong-fei,王恒蘭, Heng-lan,張輝, Hui(2018)。認知語言學和語言類型學視角下的詞類認知神經科學研究。外語教學，39(3)，15-20。
33. 張俊, Jun(2020)。不一致性：《現代漢語詞典》詞類標注亟需解決的問題。外國語言文學，2020(3)，290-303。
34. 陳旻昕, Min-hsin(2016)。台北=Taipei，國立臺灣大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
35. 鹿子佳, Zi-jia,符穎, Ying,張慢慢, Man-man,臧傳麗, Chuan-li,白學軍, Xue-jun(2022)。中文詞類資訊在副中央凹中的加工。心理學報，54(5)，441-452。
36. 劉月華, Yue-hua,潘文娛, Wen-yu,故韡, Wei(2019).實用現代漢語語法.北京=Beijing:商務印書館=The Commercial Press.