An Empirical Study on Teaching Half-T3 First in L2 Mandarin

華語Half-T3 First三聲教學之實證研究

Yun-Chih HUANG(黃韻芷)；Yu-Hsin HUANG(黃郁欣)

Computational Complexity Hypothesis ； Full-T3 First ； Half-T3 First ； Optimality Theory ； Tonal Markedness Scale ； Full-T3 First ； Half-T3 First ； 計算複雜性假說 ； 優選理論 ； 聲調有標刻度

華語文教學研究

20卷3期（2023 / 09 / 01）

57 - 88

英文;繁體中文

This study investigates the teaching and learning of Mandarin Chinese tones, with a specific focus on pedagogical aspects related to the third tone (T3), which are developed from different theoretical assumptions concerning the default form of T3. The traditional teaching method asserts that the full-T3 (with a dipping contour, [214]) is the standard form, while the innovative approach posits the half-T3 (with a low falling contour, [21]) as the standard. Since no experimental study has examined the impact of these two teaching methods, a training study was conducted to compare their effectiveness and determine which one might be more beneficial for L2 learners. Thirty-two non-tonal speakers participated in this study and a two-stage production test (comprising an immediate posttest and a delayed posttest) was employed to assess the participants' T3 performance. The findings indicate that the Half-T3 First (HT3F) teaching method generally enhances the tone production skill of L2 learners across most tone combinations. However, in the case of the T3-T3 combination, a significant decrease in pre-T3 accuracy and subpar performance in phrase-final T3 were observed. This unexpected outcome was attributed to the general principle of faithfulness within the framework of Optimality Theory, suggesting that the HT3F may encounter constraint violations.

本文研究華語聲調的教授和學習，並著重關注第三聲（T3）的教學議題。此議題是由對T3默認形式的不同理論假設發展而來的：傳統教學方法認為full-T3（下沉輪廓，音高標示為［214］）是標準形式；而新創教法則以half-T3（低頻，［21］）作為標準形式。由於目前沒有實驗研究驗證此兩種教學方法的效果，因此本研究進行了教學實驗研究來比較這兩種教學方法，並從中找出對第二語言學習者更有利的一種。本研究測試32位母語為無聲調的參與者，以兩階段的語言產出測試（立即後測和延遲後測）來評估參與者T3的表現。結果顯示，Half-T3 First（HT3F）的教學方法普遍提高了L2學習者在多數聲調組合中的三聲正確率。然而，在T3-T3的組合裡，研究參與者在第一音節三聲的正確率明顯消退，且第二音節三聲的表現不佳。此出乎意料的結果可歸因於優選理論（Optimality Theory）的忠實性原則（Principle of Faithfulness），而這則表示HT3F仍須考慮是否違反重要語音約束（Constraint）。

1. Chen, Chung-yu,Shih, Chilin(2021).The acquisition of Mandarin by heritage speakers and second language learners: the case of tone sandhi perception.Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,18(4),19-66.
   連結：
2. Broselow, Ellen,Chen, Su-I.,Wang, Chilin(1998).The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,20(2),261-280.
3. Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24-27.
4. Chen, Qinghai(1997).Toward a sequential approach for tonal error analysis.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,32(1),21-39.
5. Chen, Yiya,Xu, Yi(2006).Production of weak elements in speech–evidence from f₀ patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese.Phonetica,63(1),47-75.
6. Cheng, Chin-Chuan(1973).A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese.The Hague:Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Chomsky, Noam(1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam(1981).Lectures on Government and Binding.Dordrecht:Foris Publications.
9. Duanmu, San(2000).The phonology of standard Chinese.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
10. He, Yunjuan(2014).The factors affecting the production of Mandarin Chinese coarticulated tones by American learners.International Chinese Language Education,1,136-146.
11. Hyman, Larry M.(2007).Universals of tone rules: 30 years later.Tones and Tunes: Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody,Berlin:
12. Hyman, Larry M.,VanBik, Kenneth(2004).Directional rule application and output problems in Hakha Lai Tone.Language and Linguistics,5(4),821-861.
13. Jakubowicz, Celia(2011).Measuring derivational complexity: new evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French.Lingua,121(3),339-351.
14. Kager, René(1999).Optimality Theory.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
15. Krithikadatta, Jogikalmat(2014).Normal Distribution.Journal of Conservative Dentistry,17(1),96-97.
16. Li, Charles N.,Thompson, Sandra A.(1977).The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children.Journal of Child Language,4(2),185-199.
17. Major, Roy C.(2001).Foreign Accent: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Second Language Phonology.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. McCarthy, John. J,Prince, Alan(1995).Faithfulness and reduplicative identity.Papers in Optimality Theory,Amherst:
19. McCarthy, John,Prince, Alan(1993).Prosodic Morphology: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction.:Rutgers University.
20. Mei, Tsu-lin(1977).Tones and tone sandhi in 16th Century Mandarin.Journal of Chinese Linguistics,5(2),237-260.
21. Miracle, W. Charles(1989).Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,24,49-65.
22. Ohala, John J.(1978).Production of tone.Tone: A Linguistic Survey,New York:
23. Prévost, Phillipe,Strik, Nelleke,Tuller, Laurie(2014).Wh-questions in child L2 French: derivational complexity and its interactions with L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input.Second Language Research,30(2),225-250.
24. Prince, Alan,Smolensky, Paul(2004).Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar.Malden:Blackwell.
25. Shen, Susan X-N.(1989).Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,24(3),27-47.
26. Shi(2007).On teaching tone three in Mandarin.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,42(2),1-10.
27. Tsung, Chin(1987).Half-Third First: On the nature of the third tone.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,22(1),87-101.
28. Wang, Yue,Jongman, Allard,Sereno, Joan A.(2003).Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,113,1033-1044.
29. Winke, Paula(2007).Turning into tones: The effect of L1 background on L2 Chinese learners’ tonal production.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,42(3),21-55.
30. Xu, Yi(1997).Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin.Journal of Phonetics,25,61-83.
31. Yang, Chunsheng(2016).The Acquisition of L2 Mandarin Prosody: From Experimental Studies to Pedagogical Practice.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
32. Yin, Hui(2017).An optimality theory perspective on Mandarin tone 3 sandhi.Annals of Language and Literature,1(2),28-34.
33. Yip, Moira(2002).Tone.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
34. Yuan, Boping(2015).The effect of computational complexity on L1 transfer: evidence from L2 Chinese attitude-bearing wh-questions.Lingua,167,1-18.
35. Zhang, Hang(2018).Second Language Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese Tones.
36. Zhang, Hang(2014).The third tone: Allophones, sandhi rules, and pedagogy.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,49(1),117-145.
37. Zhu, Hua,Dodd, Barbara(2000).The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (Modern Standard Chinese).Journal of Child Language,27,3-42.
38. 國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心（編）=National Taiwan Normal University Mandarin Training Center(Ed.)(2021).當代中文課程.新北=New Taipei:聯經出版公司=Linking Publishing Company.
39. 國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心（編）=National Taiwan Normal University Mandarin Training Center(Ed.)(1999).實用視聽華語.臺北=Taipei:正中書局=Cheng Chung Book Co., Ltd..