题名

From Counting to Classifying: Unpacking the Challenges of Chinese Classifiers for Vietnamese L2 Learners

并列篇名

從計量到分類:揭開越南華語二語者華語量詞學習的挑戰

作者

Caroline LE(黎氏芳草);Chun-Yin Doris CHEN(陳純音)

关键词

Chinese ; mensural classifiers ; second language ; sortal classifiers ; Vietnamese ; 分類詞 ; 第二語言 ; 越南語 ; 華語 ; 量詞

期刊名称

華語文教學研究

卷期/出版年月

20卷3期(2023 / 09 / 01)

页次

89 - 137

内容语文

英文;繁體中文

中文摘要

This study investigated the acquisition of Chinese classifiers by Vietnamese adult learners, including mensural and sortal classifiers. Thirty participants were divided into low-intermediate and high-intermediate proficiency, with a control group of fifteen Taiwanese native Chinese speakers. Both multiple-choice tasks and picture description tasks were employed to examine the participants' comprehension and production of Chinese classifiers. In each task, sortal classifiers and mensural classifiers denoting shape, animacy, function, event, standard, container, partitive, and group were selected to test the participants' performance on various classifiers. Results of the study are as follows: First, the Vietnamese adults in the low-intermediate Chinese proficiency group performed significantly better on mensural classifiers than on sortal classifiers, while those in the high-intermediate group performed equally well on both mensural classifiers and sortal classifiers. Second, the Vietnamese participants showed variations in their performance on different types of classifiers. Container, Function, and Shape classifiers were found to be more easily acquired than Partitive, Group, and Event classifiers. Third, the Low-Intermediate participants tended to use the general classifier ge as a placeholder, using it substantially more frequently than the High-Intermediate group.

英文摘要

本研究旨在探討越南成年學習者華語在數量和分類量詞的習得,研究對象為30位越南華語二語學習者,依其華語程度分為中初級組和中高級組,並以在臺的華語母語者作為控制組。本研究採用選擇題型和圖片描述題型評量研究對象對華語量詞的理解和使用。為了解越南成年學習者對不同類型華語量詞的掌握,每個任務選擇的量詞包含表示形狀、生命性、功能、事件、標準、容器、部分和群組等類別。研究結果顯示:第一,華語程度低的越南學習者在數量詞的表現優於分類詞,而華語程度高的越南成年人在數量詞和分類詞兩者表現皆佳。第二,越南華語二語學習者在不同類型的量詞上表現不同,表容器、功能和形狀的量詞相較於表部分、群體和事件的量詞來得更容易習得。第三,中初級組視「個」為量詞保留位置,因此比中高級組實際上更常使用「個」。

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Huang, Ya-Wei Vivian,Chen, Chun-Yin Doris(2009).Chinese children’s acquisition of classifiers revisited.Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,6(1),1-38.
    連結:
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.(2000).Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  3. Al-Khresheh, Mohammad Hamad(2015).A review study of interlanguage theory.International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature,4(3),123-131.
  4. Allan, Keith(1977).Classifiers.Language,53(2),285-311.
  5. Alves, Mark J.(2003).Ruc and other Minor Vietic languages: Linguistic str ands between Vietnamese and the rest of the Mon-Khmer language family.Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society,Tempe, Arizona:
  6. Alves, Mark J.(2018).Early Sino-Vietnamese lexical data and the relative chronology oftonogenesis in Chinese and Vietnamese.Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics,11(1-2),3-33.
  7. Bale, Alan,Coon, Jessica,López, Nicolás Arcos(2019).Classifiers, partitions, and measurements: Exploring the syntax and semantics of sortal classifiers.Glossa: A journal of general linguistics,4(1),1-30.
  8. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen,Sybesma, Rint(1999).Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.Linguistic Inquiry,30(4),509-542.
  9. Chiang, Kuan-Hsien Joyce(2019).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
  10. Chien, Yu-Chin,Lust, Barbara,Chiang, Chi-Pang(2003).Chinese children's comprehension of count-classifiers and mass-classifiers.Journal of East Asian Linguistics,12(2),91-120.
  11. Council of Europe(2011).Using the CEFR: Principles of Good Practice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  12. Ellis, Rod,Ellis, Rod R.(1994).The Study of Second Language Acquisition.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  13. Erbaugh, Mary S.(1986).Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children.Noun classes and categorization,Amsterdam:
  14. Fukuda, Shin(2007).The syntax of telicity in Vietnamese.Proceedings of 34th Western Conference on Linguistics,Fresno, CA:
  15. Gao, Helena H.(2010).A study of Swedish speakers' learning of Chinese noun classifiers.Nordic Journal of Linguistics,33(2),197-229.
  16. Gong, Jiang Song(2010).Montana,University of Montana.
  17. Greenberg, Joseph H.(1972).Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type.Working Papers on Language Universals,9,1-39.
  18. Hardjanto, Tofan Dwi(1995).Interlanguage and interlanguage continuum.Humaniora,2,96-103.
  19. Hu, Qian(1993).Massachusetts,Boston University.
  20. Hui, Sim Sook(2005).Singapore,National University of Singapore.
  21. Karim, Khaled,Nassaji, Hossein(2013).First language transfer in second language writing: An examination of current research.Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research,1(1),117-134.
  22. Lado, Robert(1957).Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers.Ann Arbor, Michigan:University of Michigan Press.
  23. Li, Charles N.,Thompson, Sandra A.(1974).An exaplanation of word order change SVO→SOV.Foundations of Language,12(2),201-214.
  24. Liang, Neal Szu-Yen(2008).The acquisition of Chinese shape classifiers by L2 adult learners.Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics,Columbus, OH:
  25. Liang, Szu-Yen(2009).Texas,The University of Texas at Arlington.
  26. Light, Timothy(1979).Word order and word order change in Mandarin Chinese.Journal of Chinese Linguistics,7(2),149-180.
  27. Lightbown, Patsy M.,Spada, Nina(2013).How Languages Are Learned.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  28. Liu, Haiyong(2008).A case study of the acquisition of Mandarin cla ssifiers.Language Research,44(1),345-360.
  29. Liu, Hengshuang,Hao, Hongyan(2021).Input enhancement improved L2 learners’ production of Chinese classifiers.Chinese as a Second Language Research,10(1),53-73.
  30. Lust, Barbara C.(2006).Child language: Acquisition and Growth.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  31. Matisoff, James. A.(1991).Sino-Tibetan linguistics: present state and future prospects.Annual review of anthropology,20,469-504.
  32. Mou, Bo(1999).The structure of the Chinese language and ontological insights: a collective-noun hypothesis.Philosophy East and West,49(1),45-62.
  33. Quang, N.H.,Nocera, P.,Castelli, E.,Van Loan, T.(2008).A novel approach in continuous speech recognition for Vietnamese, an isolating tonal language.Interspeech 2008 - 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association,Brisbane, Australia:
  34. Selinker, Larry(1972).Interlanguage.International Review of Applied Linguistics,10,209-231.
  35. Simpson, Andrew,Ngo, Binh(2018).Classifier syntax in Vietnamese.Journal of East Asian Linguistics,27(3),211-246.
  36. Tai, James H. Y.(1994).Chinese classifier systems and human categorization.In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change,Taipei:
  37. Tran, Hai Thi Thanh(2021).Winnipeg, Canada,University of Manitoba.
  38. Tran, Jennie(2011).Hawaii, United States,University of Hawaii at Manoa.