Speaking of China/Speaking of Europe

論說中國與論說歐洲

10.6163/tjeas.2007.4(1)69

Matt K. Matsuda

中國性 ； 歐洲性 ； 儒學 ； 文明 ； 後殖民 ； 流移 ； 普世性 ； Chineseness ； Europeaness ； Confucianism ； civilization ； postcolonial ； diaspora ； universality

臺灣東亞文明研究學刊

4卷1期（2007 / 06 / 01）

69 - 88

英文

本文檢視歐洲，特別是法國，自十八世紀以來對中國之評述，由之分析如何以定義文化認同方式建構歐洲性與中國性。 探討中國性與歐洲性並非主張東方與西方不可比較，因為此二者間差異實奠基於將中國與政治上及哲學上之儒家作為歐洲來理解的框架之中。此乃為普遍性人文主義作用於中，因其並不視個人主義與社群主義為對立二極，而是連結了古典與現代，並藉由人類共同的歷史界定歐洲（或法國）與中國偉大文明。

A focus on European, particularly French, commentaries about China examines the ways that Europeanness and Chineseness have been structured by attempts to define cultural identities inexorably linked to commonly shared projects: adherences to historical estate defined by universality and civilization. Interrogating Chineseness and Europeaness does not propose incommensurability between East and West, for such a difference is framed within an understanding of China and-politically and philosophically-Confucianism, as a Europeanism. This is a universal humanism that operates because it proposes not an opposition between individualism and communitarianism, but because it ties the classical to the modern (court government and export capitalism), and defines the shaping of great civilizations, here Europe (or France) and China, through common heritage.

1. (2005).Quand La Chine S'Eveillera.L'Histoire,300
2. Council of Europe Draft Text for the European Constitution (http://ue.eu.int/igcpdf/en/04/cg00/cg00087-re02.en04.pdf)
3. Bennett, David(ed.)(1993).Cultural Studies: Pluralism and Theory.Melbourne:University of Melbourne.
4. Bergère, Marie-Claire(1986).L'âge d'or de la bourgeoisie chinoise, 1911-1937.Paris:Flammarion.
5. Bergère, Marie-Claire,Bianco, Lucien,Domes, Jürgen(1989).La Chine au XXe siècle.Paris:Fayard.
6. Buruma, Ian(2001).Bad Elements: Chinese Rebels from Los Angeles to Beijing.New York:Random House.
7. Callahan, William(2004).Institutions of Ethics? The Logic of Regionalism in Europe and East Asia.Conference of "Asian Studies in Europe and China",Brussels:
8. Cartier, Michel(ed.)(1998).La Chine entre amour et haine: actes du VIIIe Colloque de sinologie de Chantilly.Paris:Desclee de Brouwer.
9. Descombes, Vincent(1980).Modern French Philosophy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
10. Dufour, Jean-François(2003).La Chine au XXIe siècle: Entre promesses et defies.Milan:Toulouse.
11. Elisseeff, Danielle(2003).Confucius, des Mots en Action.Gallimard:Reunion des musees nationaux.
12. Gandini, Jean J.(1986).Aux sources de la révolution chinoise, les anarchistes: contribution historique de 1902 à 1927.Lyon:Atelier de creation libertaire.
13. Gernet, Jean(2003).Le Monde Chinois.Paris:Armand Colin.
14. Godement, François(ed.)(2001).Chine, Etats-Unis: entre méfiance et pragmatisme.Paris:Institut franc?ais des relations internationales.
15. Granet, Marcel(1980).La Pensée Chinoise.Paris:Albin Michel.
16. Habermas, Jurgen,Derrida, Jacques(2003).After the War: the Rebirth of Europe.Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Libération,2003(5)
17. Jacobs, Dirk,Maier, Robert(1998).European Identity: Construct, Fact, and Fiction.A United Europe: the quest for a multifaceted identity,Maastricht:
18. Jones, David M.(2001).The Image of China in Western Social and Political Thought.New York:Palgrave.
19. La Nouvelle Revue d''Histoire(2005).La Chine et l'Occident.La Nouvelle Revue d'Histoire,19
20. Lasch, Donald F.(1993).Asia in the Making of Europe.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
21. Meerwald, Agnes M. L.(2001).Chineseness at the Crossroads.European Journal of Cultural Studies,4(4),387-404.
22. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat(1989).The Spirit of the Laws.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat(1993).The Persian Letters.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
24. Muller-Hofstede, Christophe(2000).Asian Values,' Autocratic Propaganda or Useful Incitements for European Societies?.Cross-Cultural Readings of Chineseness: Narratives, Images, and Interpretations of the 1990s,Berkeley:
25. Picquart, Pierre(2004).L'Empire Chinois: Mieux comprendre le Futur no. 1 Mondial: histoire et actualité de la diaspora chinoise.Lausanne:Favre.
26. Picquart, Pierre(2001).Géopolitique Migratoire des Chinois de France et d'Europe.Mouvements,26
27. Pinot, Virgile(1971).La Chine et la formation de l'esprit philosophique en France, 1640-1740.Genève:Slatkine Reprints.
28. Pomeranz, Kenneth(2001).The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
29. Raibaud, Martine,Souty, François(2000).Europe-Asie: Echanges, Ethiques, et Marchés, XVIIe-XXIe siècles.Paris:Indes Savantes.
30. Salese, Yves(1997).Propositions pour une autre Europe. Construire Babel.Paris:Editions du Felin.
31. Schram, Stuart R.(ed.)(1973).Authority, Participation and Cultural Change in China: Essays by a European Study Group.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
32. Tepperman, Jonathan(2001).In Search of Chineseness.Newsweek,Nov. 19
33. Tu, Wei-Ming(ed.)(1994).The Living Tree: The Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
34. Waldron, Arthur(2000).The Chineseness of Taiwan.Policy Review,102,27.
35. Wilson, Ming(ed.),Cayley, John(ed.)(1995).Europe Studies China: Papers from an International Conference on the History of European Sinology.London:Han-Shan Tang.
36. Wong, Roy B.(2000).China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
37. Yeh, Wen-hsin(ed.)(2000).Cross-Cultural Readings of Chineseness: Narratives, Images, and Interpretations of the 1990s.Berkeley:Center for Chinese Studies.