朱子在宋明儒學的地位重探

Further Reflections on the Key Position Chu Hsi Occupied in Sung-Ming Neo-Confucianism

10.6163/tjeas.2008.5(2)1

劉述先(Shu-Hsien Liu)

濂、洛、關、閩 ； 道統 ； 陽明致良知教 ； 蕺山誠意慎獨教 ； 現代新儒學 ； 理一分殊 ； Lien ； Lo ； Kuan ； Min ； Tao-t'ung ； Yang-Ming's teachings of extending innate knowledge of the good ； Chi-shan's teachings of sincerity of the will and keeping vigilance in solitude ； contemporary Neo- Confucianism ； li-i-fen-shu

臺灣東亞文明研究學刊

5卷2期（2008 / 12 / 01）

1 - 11

繁體中文

Chu Hsi's key position in Sung-Ming Neo-Confucianism is related to his effort to establish the orthodox line of transmission of the Way (Tao-t'ung). In the famous Preface to his Commentary on the Doctrine of the Mean, he traced the line back to ancient sage-emperors, Confucius and Mencius, then to Sung Neo- Confucians. He and his friend Lü Tsu-ch'ien compiled the Neo-Confucian Anthology: Reflections on Things at Hand in which he established the lineage of Lien (Chou Lien-hsi), Lo (Ch'eng Ming-tao and Ch'eng I-chuan), Kuan (Chang Heng-chü), and Min (himself). The posterity accepted this lineage but gave different interpretations. In the Ming dynasty, Wang Yang-ming promoted his teachings of extending innate knowledge of the good (liang-chih), and Liu Chishan his teachings of sincerity of the will and keeping vigilance in solitude. The contemporary Neo-Confucianism continued this line, gave Chu Hsi's ”li-i-fenshu” (one principle, many manifestations) totally new interpretations to face the challenge of developing a global ethic in the 21st century and the new millennium.

Chu Hsi's key position in Sung-Ming Neo-Confucianism is related to his effort to establish the orthodox line of transmission of the Way (Tao-t'ung). In the famous Preface to his Commentary on the Doctrine of the Mean, he traced the line back to ancient sage-emperors, Confucius and Mencius, then to Sung Neo- Confucians. He and his friend Lü Tsu-ch'ien compiled the Neo-Confucian Anthology: Reflections on Things at Hand in which he established the lineage of Lien (Chou Lien-hsi), Lo (Ch'eng Ming-tao and Ch'eng I-chuan), Kuan (Chang Heng-chü), and Min (himself). The posterity accepted this lineage but gave different interpretations. In the Ming dynasty, Wang Yang-ming promoted his teachings of extending innate knowledge of the good (liang-chih), and Liu Chishan his teachings of sincerity of the will and keeping vigilance in solitude. The contemporary Neo-Confucianism continued this line, gave Chu Hsi's ”li-i-fenshu” (one principle, many manifestations) totally new interpretations to face the challenge of developing a global ethic in the 21st century and the new millennium.

1. (1997)。論王陽明的最後定見。中國文哲研究集刊，11，165-188。
   連結：
2. (2001)。全球倫理與宗教對話。臺北:立緒文化。
3. (1968)。心體與性體。臺北:正中書局。
4. (2001)。論黃宗羲對于孟子的理解。鵝湖月刊，2-17。
5. (1998)。儒學的理想與實際－近世東亞發展之成就與限制之反省。中國文哲研究通訊，8(3)
6. (1984)。論陽明哲學之朱子思想淵源。香港中文大學中國文化研究所學報，15
7. (2006)。黃宗羲心學的定位。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。
8. (2000)。儒家思想意涵之現代闡釋論集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。
9. (1971)。朱子新學案。臺北:三民書局。
10. (2006)。全球倫理與宗教對話。石家庄:河北人民出版社。
11. 宋朱熹編(1967)。近思錄。臺北:商務印書館。
12. Chu Hsi,Lawrence C. Becker (edited)(1992).Encyclopedia of Ethics.New York:Garland Published Inc..
13. Guy S. Alitto(1979).The Confucian: Liang Shu-ming and the Chinese Dilemma of Modernity.Berkeley:University of California Press.
14. Hans Küng (eds.),Karl-Josef Kuschel (eds.)(1993).A Global Ethic, The Declaration of World's Religions.London:SCM Press.
15. Leonard Swidler (ed.)(1999).For All Life: Toward a Declaration of a Global Ethic: An Interreligious Dialogue.Ashland, Oregon:White Cloud Press.
16. Zhu Xi,Chu Hsi(2003).Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy.New York:Routledge.
17. 方克立(1997)。現代新儒學與中國現代化。天津:天津人民出版社。
18. 余英時(2003)。朱熹的歷史世界－宋代士大夫政治文化的研究。臺北:允晨。
19. 陳代湘(2003)。現代新儒學與朱子學。長沙:湖南人民。
20. 新亞書院所(2008)。論儒家哲學的三個大時代。香港:中文大學出版社。
21. 劉述先(1982)。朱子哲學思想的發展與完成。台北:臺灣學生書局。
22. 劉述先(1982)。朱子哲學思想的發展與完成。台北:臺灣學生書局。
23. 劉述先(1982)。朱子哲學思想的發展與完成。台北:臺灣學生書局。

1. 曾春海(2021)。評比朱熹與錢穆的道統觀。哲學與文化，48(9)，99-114。
2. 陳復(2010)。論唐君毅對王陽明心學的詮釋與評價。哲學與文化，37(5)，85-106。
3. 張雅評(2013)。李栗谷、成牛溪「四端七情」論辯。鵝湖月刊，462，35-46。
4. (2017)。為己之學與為人之學：從後現代重新審視學人往事。二十一世紀，160，67-79。