题名

日帝時期韓儒朴殷植的開化意識與陽明學

并列篇名

The Modemization Consciousness and Yang-Ming Confucianism of Korean Confucian Park Eun-Sik in Japanese Ruled Period

DOI

10.6163/tjeas.2011.8(2)271

作者

黃麗生(Li-Sheng Huang)

关键词

韓國儒學 ; 朴殷植 ; 開化意識 ; 陽明學 ; Korean Confucianism ; Park Eun-Sik ; Modernization Consciousness ; Yang-Ming Confucianism

期刊名称

臺灣東亞文明研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

8卷2期(2011 / 12 / 01)

页次

271 - 312

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

日帝時期韓儒朴殷植(1859-1925)因應時代變遷,並受當時中、日儒者的影響,在開化意識的脈絡下,重新理解陽明學的本質。他主張實踐的儒學,具有開放的跨界思維與改革意志,並以實際作為展開民族啟蒙運動,奠立現代韓國的基礎。他由一位傑出的朱子學者轉向陽明學,並以陽明學作為處於時代開化、儒學傳承、國族主義以及與東亞周邊國家密切互動之間達成平衡的動力與理論基礎。本文從「立本求新」、「良知本心與實踐應變」、「國族自主與大同主義」三方面論證朴殷植的陽明學如何在多重的思想張力中展開,並企圖在相對元素中拓展其互以為力的可能性,進而在超克中昇華。朴殷植陽明學的開展,印證了近代東亞儒學在西力衝擊下跨海錯綜的互動境況。

英文摘要

Korean Confucian Park Eun-sik (1859-1925), whose view was affected by both Chinese and Japanese Confucian scholars, had reinterpreted Yang-ming Confucianism with his modernization consciousness during the Japanese colonial period in Korea. With reformative will and trans-national open mind, Park Eun-sik had advocated the practical Confucianism and guided Korean national enlightenment and modernization campaigns. As an outstanding Zhu-xi scholar, Park Eun-sik had converted to Yang-ming Confucianism and taken it as the motive and theoretical foundation to get balance among the Confucian legacy, modernization, Korean nationalism and the international relations around East Asia. This article aims at discussing how Park's Yang-ming Confucianism has involved in multiphase thoughtful tensions and attempted to develop the dual-force possibilities between relative factors from three aspects: 1. Essentiality and innovation; 2. Conscience and phronesis; 3. National self-determination and cosmopolitanism. It shall be conclusively shown that the development of Park's Yang-ming Confucianism has reflected the trans-seas complexity of international interactions of modem East Asian Confucianism.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 鄭仁在(2010)。韓國現代實學者為堂鄭寅普的實心思想。鵝湖月刊,35(8)
    連結:
  2. 高瀨武次郎=Takase, Takejirō 1915 《王陽明詳傳》 ( 東京:廣文堂書店, 1915 年) Ō Yōmei shōden (Tokyo: Kōbundō Shoten, 1915)
  3. 〔韓〕成均館大學=Sung kyun kwan University 網頁: http ://www. skku.edu/index_pc.jsp=website: http ://www.skku.edu/index_pc.jsp
  4. 권윤건, Yun-jin(2004).서울=首爾=Seoul,연세대학교교육대학원역사교육전공=延世大學校教育大學院歷史教育系=Department of History Education, Yon Sei University.
  5. 금장태, Jang-tae(1993).진암이병헌의 유교개현사상.철학괴 현질,16
  6. 금장태, Jang-tae(2004).개화사괴 근대 개현 사상.京畿=Gyeong gi:??????(?)=韓國學術資訊股份公司=Korean Studies Information Co., Ltd..
  7. 朴殷植(2002).白巖朴殷植全集.서울=首爾:?????=東方媒體.
  8. 김교빈, Kyo-bin(1999).조선 후기 주자학괴 양명학의 논쟁.시대외철학,10(2)
  9. 김길릭, Gil-lak(2002).白巖朴殷植의陽明學괴近代精神.陽明學,7
  10. 宋錫準(2005)。韓國陽明學的形成和霞谷鄭齊斗。韓國江華陽明學研究論集,臺北=Taipei:
  11. 金昌叔(1973).心山遺稿.서울=首爾:韓國文教部國史編纂委員會.
  12. 梁元生(2008)。邊緣與之間。香港=Hong Kong:三聯書店=Joint Publishing。
  13. 박상리, Sang-li(2009).조선 후기 유학자 들의 양명학적 문제 의식.陽明學,22
  14. 송석준, Seok-chun(2005).한말 양명학의 전개외 연구 현황.陽明學,13
  15. 유준기, June-ki(1999).한국근대유교 개혁운동사.京畿=Gyeong gi:??????=亞細亞文化社=Asea munhwa sa.
  16. 장현근, Hyun-geun(2004).유교근대화와 계몽주의적 한민족국가 구상: 박은식‧장지 연의 국가건설 사상.동양정치사상사,3(2)
  17. 조남욱, nam-uk,조윤래, Yun-rae(2000).일제시대의韓國儒教외儒教教育.韓國民族文化,16(1)
  18. 劉準基, June-ki(1994).朴殷植의大同思想괴儒教改革論.韓國民族運動史研究,10
  19. 최재목, Jae-mok(2005).朴殷植괴日本陽明學의괸런성.日本思想,8
  20. 鄭仁在編、黃俊傑編(2005)。韓國江華陽明學研究論集,臺北=Taipei:
  21. 鄭德熙(1986)。陽明學對韓國的影響。臺北=Taipei:文史哲出版社=Wen shi zhe chu ban she。
  22. 한국정신몬화연구원 한국민족문화대백괴사편찬부=韓國精神文化研究院韓國民族文化大百科詞典編纂部=The Academy of Korean studies(2007).한국인족문화 대백괴 사선.서울=首爾=Seoul:????=熊進出版=Yoongjin chul pan.
  23. 簡江作(2005)。韓國歷史與現代韓國。臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press, Ltd.。
被引用次数
  1. 許怡齡(2016)。從「儒學」到「儒教」的脈絡性轉換:「西學」與朝鮮思想史的轉換點。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊,13(2),101-126。