十二至十三世紀東亞禪宗與儒教：試論道元關於三教一致說批判的對象及其背景

East Asian Ch'an Buddhism and Confucianism in 12th and 13th Century: Examines Targets and Background of Dōgen's Criticism of the Theory of the Consistency among the Three Major Chinese Religions

10.6163/tjeas.2014.11(1)135

何燕生(Yan-Sheng He)

東亞禪宗 ； 三教一致說批判 ； 道元禪學 ； 《法華經》 ； 《楞嚴經》 ； 《圓覺經》 ； 六祖惠能 ； East Asian Ch'an Buddhism ； Criticism of the theory of the consistency among the three major Chinese religions ； Dōgen's Zen Buddhism ； Saddharma-pundarika-Sūtra ； Surangamasamadhi (Lengyan Jing) ； Yuanjue Sūtra ； Six Patriarch Huineng

臺灣東亞文明研究學刊

11卷1期（2014 / 06 / 01）

135 - 163

繁體中文

本文對道元關於三教一致說批判的對象和背景進行了考察。所謂三教一致說，即主張儒、釋、道三教在根本上為一致，宋代（960-1279）盛行這種學說，道元（1200-1253）斥其是「邪說」，認為宋朝三教一致說的流行，是佛法衰微的標誌，勸告弟子不要輕聽其言。據道元說，主張三教一致說的人，貶低《法華經》的教義，而推崇《楞嚴經》和《圓覺經》。道元依據六祖惠能（638-713）推崇《法華經》、《涅槃經》和《金剛經》的說法，認為推崇《楞嚴經》和《圓覺經》，不符合禪宗的傳統，而且指出《楞嚴經》和《圓覺經》，古來曾有人斥之為偽經，非佛所說。經筆者對道元所有著述的考證，道元開始批判三教一致說的年代為日本寬元元年（1243），在此之前並未見有批判的言論。寬元元年，入宋歸國的日本臨濟宗的聖一（1202-1280）來到京都，主持東福寺；而且，達摩宗的門徒相繼皈依道元也正是這一年。他們都推崇《楞嚴經》和《圓覺經》，並提倡三教一致說。他們的傳法世系，皆為宋代中國的臨濟宗。鑒於這些事實，筆者認為，道元三教一致說批判的對象，其實就是宋代中國的臨濟宗以及繼承其法系的日本臨濟宗和達摩宗；其批判的背景主要是由於當時達摩宗和臨濟宗的存在；道元站在六祖惠能的經典觀來批判他們，旨在闡明自己所傳之禪思想的正統性，強調自己遵循的是唐代惠能以來的正統佛法。

This paper examines the targets and background of Dōgen's criticism of the theory of the consistency among the three major Chinese religions. This theory argues that Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism were fundamentally in agreement with one another. Dōgen felt that the Song (960-1279) theory in vogue at that time was also heterodoxy, and felt that the popularity of the theory of the consistency among the three major religions was an indicator of the decline of Buddhism, and urged his disciples not to listen to it so uncritically. According to what Dōgen said, those who advocated the theory of consistency belittled the doctrine of the Saddharma-pundarika-Sūtra (法華經) and esteemed the Surangamasamadhi (首楞嚴經) and Yuanjue (圓覺經) Sūtra. Because it was said that the Six Patriarch Huineng (惠能, 638-713) esteemed the Saddharmapundarlka, Mahaparnirvana (涅槃經) and Vajra (金剛經) Sūtra, Dōgen felt that it was inconsistent with Zen tradition to esteem the Surangamasamadhi and Yuanjue Sūtras, pointing out that from very early on there had been those who doubted the authenticity of the Surangamasamadhi and Yuanjue Sūtras, suggesting that they were not Buddhist. According to our research, Dōgen first started to criticize the theory of the consistency of the three religions in 1243. One cannot find any criticism from him before that date. In 1243 Shoichi (聖一, 1202-1280), a Japanese monk of the Linji (臨濟) Sect who had made a pilgrimage to China, arrived in Kyoto to be the abbot of Tofuku (東福) Temple. It was also precisely in this year that many disciples of the Daruma Sect came to Dōgen to be converted to his sect. All of these disciples esteemed the Surangamasamadhi and Yuanjue Sūtra, and advocated the consistency of the three religions. Their stream of teaching was completely of the Chinese Song Dynasty Linji Sect. Having verified these facts, we believe that the targets of Dōgen's criticism were in fact the Chinese Linji Sect and those who continued their stream of teaching in Japan, the Japanese followers of the Linji Sect, as well as the followers of the Daruma Sect. The reason for carrying out this criticism was because of the existence of the Daruma and Linji Sects in Japan. He wanted to criticize them from the viewpoint of sutras held by the Sixth Patriarch, and thus make crystal clear the orthodoxy of the Zen ideas he taught, and emphasize that what he adhered to was the orthodoxy that had been passed down from the Six Patriarch Huineng of the Tang Dynasty (618-907).

1. ﹝唐﹞宗密 1924-1934 《原人論》，收於《大正新修大藏經》第 45 冊（東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924-1934 年）
2. (1965)。四部叢刊初編縮本。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
3. ﹝南宋﹞宗杲 1924-1934 《大慧普覺禪師法語》，收於《大正新修大藏經》第 47 冊（東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924-1934 年）
4. ﹝北宋﹞延壽 1924-1934 《萬善同歸集》，收於《大正新修大藏經》第 48 冊（東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924-1934 年）
5. ﹝唐﹞湛然 1924-1934《摩訶止觀輔行傳弘決》，收於《大正新修大藏經》第 46冊 （東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924-1934 年）
6. (1965)。四部叢刊初編縮本。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
7. (1965)。四部叢刊初編縮本。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
8. (1965)。四部叢刊初編縮本。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
9. ﹝南宋﹞無准師範 1902-1905 《無准師範禪師語錄》，收於《卍續藏經》第 121 卷（東京：圖書出版，1902-1905 年）
10. ﹝日﹞最澄 1924-1934 《傳教大師將來越州目錄》，收於《大正新修大藏經》第55冊（東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924-1934 年）
11. 北宋道原(1970)。景德傳燈錄。臺北:真善美出版社。
12. 南宋宗杲、荒木見悟譯注(1969)。大慧書。東京:筑摩書房。
13. 大穀哲夫(1983)。日本禪家における三教一致説批判：道元禪師とその門流について。北海道駒澤大學研究紀要，18，1-23。
14. 中嶋隆藏(1985)。六朝思想の研究─士大夫と佛教。京都=Kyoto:平樂寺書店=Heirakuji shoten。
15. 古田紹欽(1981)。古田紹欽著作集。東京=Tokyo:講談社=Kodansha。
16. 池田魯參(1990)。道元學の搖籃。東京=Tokyo:大藏出版社=Daizo shubbansha。
17. 竹內道雄(1992)。道元。東京=Tokyo:吉川弘文館=Yoshi kawakobunkan。
18. 何燕生譯注(2003)。正法眼藏。北京=Beijing:宗教文化出版社=Zongjiaowenhua chubanshe。
19. 呂澂(1991)。呂澂佛學論著選集。濟南=Shandong:齊魯書社=Qilushushe。
20. 河村孝道編(1975)。諸本對校永平開山道元禪師行狀建撕記。東京=Tokyo:大修館書店=Taishukan。
21. 柳田聖山(1987)。中國撰述經典。東京=Tokyo:筑摩書房=Chikuma shobo。
22. 荒木見悟(1987)。中國撰述經典。東京=Tokyo:筑摩書房=Chikuma shobo。
23. 荻須純道(1965)。日本中世禪宗史。東京=Tokyo:木耳社=Mokujisha。
24. 道元(1990)。正法眼藏。東京:岩波書店。
25. 道元、大久保道舟編(1969)。道元禪師全集。東京:春秋社。
26. 鏡島元隆編、鈴木格禪編(1991)。十二卷本正法眼藏の諸問題。東京=Tokyo:大藏出版社=Daizo shubbansha。
27. 鏡島元隆(1961)。道元禪師とその門流。東京=Tokyo:誠信書房=Seisin shobo。
28. 鏡島元隆(1965)。道元禪師と引用經典・語錄の研究。東京=Tokyo:木耳社=Mokujisha。

1. 吳孟謙(2019)。晚明清初佛門對儒道世界觀的評判：以《楞嚴經》為核心。成大中文學報，65，155-192。