题名

某區域醫院不予插管(DNI)病人使用非侵襲性呼吸器(NIV)之現況分析

并列篇名

Experience Analysis of DNI (Do No Intubation) Patients Using NIV (Non-Invasive Ventilator).

DOI

10.6537/TJHPC.2017.22(1).2

作者

馬瑞菊(Jui-Chu Ma);馬瑞萍(Jui-Ping Ma);鄭佩玲(Pei-Ling Cheng);張喬茹(Chiao-Ju Chang);林佩璇(Pei-Xuan Lin);蕭嘉瑩(Chia-Ying Hsiao);蘇珉一(Min-I Su)

关键词

不施行心肺復甦術 ; 不予插管 ; 非侵襲性呼吸器 ; 症狀緩解 ; 緩和醫療 ; DNR(Do Not Resuscitate) ; DNI (Do not intubation) ; NIV(Non-invasive ventilator) ; Symptom relief ; Palliative care

期刊名称

安寧療護雜誌

卷期/出版年月

22卷1期(2017 / 03 / 01)

页次

13 - 26

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

研究目的:探討不予插管(DNI)病人使用非侵襲性呼吸器(NIV)之現況分析。材料與方法:採電子病歷回溯性調查設計,以2013年8月1日至2015年7月31日(共2年)住院中不予插管(DNI)病人使用非侵襲性呼吸器(NIV)個案進行分析。結果:DNI病人共216位,平均年齡為77.22歲(SD = 13.13)、NIV平均使用天數為6.76天(SD = 6.99)、平均住院天數為16.9天(SD = 12.42)、加護病房平均住院天數為2.59天(SD = 5.54)、醫療支出平均為2756599.3(SD = 4458370.27)元。Standard treatment使用NIV病人共103位(佔47.69%),Symptom relief使用NIV病人共113位(佔52.31%),而DNI病人使用NIV後仍插管的比率以Standard treatment組顯著高於Symptom relief組(6.8% vs. 0.9%;p = 0.022),死亡率以Symptom relief組顯著高於Standard treatment組(61.1% vs. 42.7%;p = 0.007),Symptom relief組若有使用NIV之禁忌症如;病人意識不清者有72.5%(N = 50)死亡,血液動力學不穩者則有47.8%(N = 33)死亡。結論:不予插管(DNI)病人中約有五成病人是為了緩和醫療(Symptom relief)的目的而使用NIV,但較Standard treatment使用者死亡率顯著為高,而使用NIV有意識不清之禁忌症者其死亡率更高達七成,因此醫療人員在提供病人或家屬維生醫療抉擇時必須詳盡說明優劣,對於意識不清者更應謹慎使用。

英文摘要

Purpose: This analysis is to explore the experiences of DNI patients using NIV. Materials and methods: The survey of the analysis is designed by tracing back the electric medical record of DNI patients using NIV from August 1st 2013 to July 1st 2015. Results: There are totally 216 patients and their information are as follows: average age of 77.22 (SD = 13.13), 6.76 days (SD = 6.99) of using NIV, 16.9 days (SD = 12.42) of hospitalisation, 2.59 days (SD = 5.54) in ICU, and NT$3,301,752.06 spent (SD = 5277696.38) in medical care. There are 103 patients (47.69%) using NIV in Standard treatment whilst there are totally 113 patients (52.31%) using NIV in Symptom relief. The ratio that DNI patients require intubation after using NIV in group of Standard treatment is significantly higher than that in Symptom relief (6.8% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.022). The death ratio of Symptom relief is significantly higher than that of Standard treatment (61.1% vs. 42.7; p = 0.007). If there was disease not allowed to use NIV (e.g. unconsciousness) in the group Symptom relief, the death ratio would be 72.5%. And patients with unstable hemadynamics are of 47.8% death ratio (N = 33). Conclusion: Around 50% of DNI patients are using NIV for palliative care (Symptom relief), but the death ratio is significantly higher than that of Standard treatment. Patients using NIV as a result of inconvenient disease of unconsciousness are of 70% death ratio. Thus, when medical crew is offering patients or their family medical options, they must explain all pros and cons detail, especially for those in unconsciousness.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 安寧緩和醫療條例。中華民國九十一年十二月十一日華總一義字第09100239020 號令修正公布第 3、7 條條文。91 年 11 月 11 日,取自http://www.tho.org.tw/xms/toc/list.php?courseID=14,2000
  2. Azoulay, E,Demoule, A,Jaber, S(2011).Palliative noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure.Intensive Care Med,37(8),1250-1257.
  3. Azoulay, E,Kouatchet, A,Jaber, S(2013).Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in patients having declined tracheal intubation.Intensive Care Med,39(2),292-291.
  4. Barlow, CM(2014).What does DNR/DNI really mean?.Nursing,44(8),65.
  5. Corrêa, TD,Sanches, PR,de Morais, LC,Scarin, FC,Silva, E,Barbas, CS(2015).Performance of noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients: aprospective, observational, cohort study.BMC Pulm Med,15,1-8.
  6. Fernandez, R,Baigorri, F,Artigas, A(2006).Noninvasive ventilation in patients with "do-not-intubate" orders: medium-term efficacy depends critically on patient selection.Intensive Care Med,33(2),350-354.
  7. Gifford, AH(2014).Noninvasive ventilation as a palliative measure.Curr Opin Support Palliat Care,8(3),218-224.
  8. Liu, L,Qiu, HB,Zheng, RQ,Yang, Y(2005).Prospective randomized controlled clinical study of early use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue,17(8),477-480.
  9. Mas, A,Masip, J(2014).Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis.,9,837-852.
  10. Nava, S,Hill, N(2009).Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.Lancet,374(9685),250-259.
  11. Pladeck, T,Hader, C,Von Orde, A,Rasche, K,Wiechmann, HW(2007).Non-invasive ventilation: comparison of effectiveness, safety, and management in acute heart failure syndromes and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.J Physiol Pharmacol,58(Suppl 5(Pt 2)),539-549.
  12. Quill, CM,Quill, TE(2014).Palliative use of noninvasive ventilation: navigating murky waters.J Palliat Med,17(6),657-661.
  13. Schettino, G,Altobelli, N,Kacmarek, RM(2005).Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation reverses acute respiratory failure in select "do-not-intubate" patients.Crit Care Med.,33(9),1976-1982.
  14. Ugurlu, A Ozsancak,Sidhom,Khodabandeh, A(2016).Use and Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in Different Age Groups.Respir Care,61(1),36-43.
  15. Vilaça, M,Aragão, I,Cardoso, T,Dias, C,Cabral-Campello, G.(2016).The Role of Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients with "Do Not Intubate" Order in the Emergency Setting.PLoS One,11(2),1-9.
  16. 王正信,董慧萍,蕭春蘭,沈慧怡,何瓊文(2008)。非侵襲性正壓通氣在重症治療的角色。秀傳醫學雜誌,8(3,4),145-152。
  17. 林慧美,楊嘉玲,陳美妙,邱泰源,胡文郁(2011)。住院病人簽屬預立醫療指示的意願及接受宣導的意向。安寧療護雜誌,16(3),281-295。
  18. 莊艷妃,黃錦鳳,黃雅庭(2015)。比較北部與東部加護病房病患簽署不施行心肺復甦術同意書對臨終前醫療處置影響之差異。慈濟技術學院學報,24,1-18。
  19. 連德正(2013)。非侵襲性呼吸器於慢性呼吸衰竭之應用。台北市醫師公會會刊,57(10),32-37。
  20. 董慧萍,吳漢屏(2009)。探討非侵襲性呼吸器在急性呼吸衰竭病人之臨床價值。台灣急診醫學會雜誌,14(4),14-19。
  21. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署。新增八類非癌症重症末期病患也能接受安寧療護服務,並正式納入健保給付。2009年 11 月 11 日,取自http://testnhi.pstcom.com.tw/information/NewsDetail.aspx?menu=9&menu_id=544&page=38&No=808。
  22. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署。102 年安寧緩和醫療條例部分條文修正案。102年 1 月 14 日,取自http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/webdata/22983_2_102%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%889%E6%97%A5%E7%B8%BD%E7%B5%B1%E4%BB%A4_%E5%AE%89%E5%AF%A7%E7%B7%A9%E5%92%8C%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E6%A2%9D%E4%BE%8B%E9%83%A8%E5%88%86%E6%A2%9D%E6%96%87%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3.pdf
  23. 黎瑞萍,陳乃釧,洪宗杰,王寧道(2008)。間歇性使用非侵襲性正壓呼吸器:一個案報告。安寧療護雜誌,13(4),484-493。
被引用次数
  1. 蘇珉一,蕭嘉瑩,鄭婉如,馬瑞菊,邱怡蓉,李孟君,李佳欣,吳珮菁(2019)。內科加護病房高齡病人臨終維生醫療處置之現況。安寧療護雜誌,23(3),205-220。