题名

三高患者防治策略指標之建立與分析

并列篇名

The Establishment and Analysis of Prevention Index in Triple-High Patients

DOI

10.30167/JOIT.201112.0010

作者

葉雲嬰(Yun-Ying Yeh)；李德松(Der-Song Lee)

关键词

三高 ； 分析層級程序法 ； Triple-High ； Analysis Hierarchy Process

期刊名称

亞東學報

卷期/出版年月

31期（2011 / 12 / 01）

页次

73 - 79

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

三高指的是高血壓、高血糖、高血脂。本研究在建立三高患者防治策略指標之評估模式；首先，模式的建構，以深度訪談專家問卷評定，篩選出在專業考量上具有高度共識的評估準則。然後，應用分析層級程序法進行專業評估。研究結果顯示，三高患者防治策略指標構面以「健康知能」權重占0.4122為最高；而評估項目之全體權重中，以「定期測量」權重占0.1075為最高，其次為「接受治療」權重占0.1061。藉此指標架構設計與調查，可獲得三高患者防治策略指標之評估模式，以供三高患者之參考。
英文摘要

Triple-High means high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and high blood lipid profile. It is a common health problem in modern society. This study adopted semi-structured interviewing method to establish a prevention index in Triple-High patients. First, the establishment is done by interviews and evaluation of experts' questionnaires to select the prevention guidelines which are commonly agreed upon. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then used to analyze the relative importance of the prevention guidelines. The results show that health literacy is the highest in priority, with 0.4122 in weight. For overall evaluative items, periodic measurement is the highest with 0.1075 in weight, followed by 0.1061 of medical treatment. The findings of this study can be useful establishing a prevention index in Triple-High patients.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
人文學 > 中國文學
基礎與應用科學 > 基礎與應用科學綜合
醫藥衛生 > 醫藥衛生綜合
工程學 > 工程學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Dalton, C., “Quotes from illiterate patients: Examples” from Emory University, Retrieved from www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/som-hlc/PatientQuotes.cfm, February 26, 2006
  2. American Medical Association Foundation, “Health literacy and patient safety: Help patients understand”, 2nd Edition, 2007.
  3. 鍾燕宜，<民眾健康知能調查-以中部地區為例>，http://researcher.nsc.gov.tw/public/jeewm/Attachment/8102220382171.pdf
  4. 蔡淑敏，<預防三高，生活飲食有秘訣>(亞東紀念醫院) ， 2009, http://hospital.kingnet.com.tw/essay/essay.html?pid=17312&category=%E7%87%9F%E9%A4%8A%E8%AA%BF%E7%90%86
  5. 詹廖明義，<健康知能(Health Literacy)與病人安全> ， 2008 ，http://blog.udn.com/ptsafetyrm/2418271#ixzz1UJU56z4G
  6. National Institute for Literacy, Washington D.C. About the National Institute for Literacy, 1991, Retrieved August 6, 2009 from www.nifl.gov/about/aboutus.html
  7. Bernard, H. R.(1988).Research methods in cultural anthropology.Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications.
  8. Orem, D. E.(1995).Nursing: Concepts of Practice.St. Louis:Mosby.
  9. Riegel, B.,Garlson, B.,Glaser, D.(2000).Development and testing of a clinical tool measuring self-management of heart failure.Heart & Lung,29(1),4-12.
  10. Saaty, T. L.(1977).A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15(2),234-281.
  11. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  12. United States Department of Health and Human Services(2000).Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health.Washington DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  13. 行政院衛生署國民健康局(2007)。,未出版
  14. 黃志祥、劉醇典、蔡靜枝(2006)。安養機構選擇之研究。2006 決策分析研討會
print cancel