Moodle線上同儕評量可信嗎？

Is Peer Assessment on Moodle Reliable?

許佩玲(Pei-Lin Hsu)

Moodle ； 同儕評量 ； 同儕回饋 ； peer assessment ； peer feedback ； college student ； Moodle

亞東學報

35期（2015 / 12 / 01）

63 - 76

繁體中文

本研究以亞東技術學院160 名學生為對象，繳交社會學科類課程的作業於Moodle 數位教學平台，另定時間舉行線上同儕評量。本研究目的在探討學生自我評分、同儕評分與教師評分的一致性程度；分析同儕評量的回饋內容；並以開放式問題徵求學生對線上同儕評量的意見與看法，以做為教學改進的參考。結果發現，學生自評成績有高估的現象，同儕評量的成績則顯得較低，而同儕評分與教師評分以第一次作業的相關係數較高為.75，達顯著水準。參與本研究的學生認為同儕評量的方式有助於觀摩學習受評者的作品，受調查的學生83%同意「評分同儕作品時，我從中學習反思自己的錯誤之處」的陳述。顯然，同儕評量有益於課程教學，亦可以增進學生反思的學習機會。最後，並提出教學評量的相關建議，以為未來課程設計的參考。

A study was conducted to investigate how grade evaluations for a university course assignment derived from peer assessment, compare to grade evaluations derived from self-assessment and teacher assessment. One hundred thirty-six undergraduate students in a university course were asked to submit an assignment to Moodle Workshop in 2014. The assignments were assessed separately by the students themselves (self-evaluation), a random group of their classroom peers (peer evaluation), and the course teacher (teacher evaluation). Students’ opinions on various aspects of the peer assessment process were also collected and analyzed. Results indicate that grade evaluations from peer assessments are inclined to be lower than evaluations from self-assessments. Grade evaluations from peer assessments and teacher assessments were more similarly matched, with a significant positive correlation of r=0.75. Many students (83%) agreed that doing peer assessment on other students’ assignments led them to reflect on how they personally performed their own assignment. The benefits of peer assessment as a tool for promoting students’ learning are explored. Implications of the results and potential future research on this topic are discussed.

1. 沈慶珩、黃信義(2006)。網路同儕互評在Moodle 系統上的應用。教育資料與圖書館學，43(3)，267-284。
   連結：
2. Andrade, H.,Valtcheva, A.(2009).Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment.Theory Into Practice,48,12-19.
3. Czekanski, K.E.,Wolf, Z. R.(2013).Encouraging and evaluating class participation.Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice,10(1)
4. Floresa, M. A.,Simãob, A. M. V.,Barrosb, A.,Pereiraa, D.(2015).Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education.Studies in Higher Education,40(9),1523-1534.
5. Gielen, M.,Wever, B. D.(2015).Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content.Computers in Human Behavior,52,315-325.
6. Lai, C. L.,Hwang, G. J.(2015).An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices.Computers & Education,85,149-159.
7. Li, L.,Liu, X.,Zhou, Y.(2012).Give and take: a re-analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology-facilitated peer assessment.British Journal of Educational Technology,43(3),376-384.
8. Liu, E. Z. F.,Lee, C. Y.(2013).Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment.The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,12(1),187-199.
9. Liu, N. F.,Carless, D.(2006).Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment.Teaching in Higher Education,11(3),279-290.
10. Lladó, A. P.,Soley, L. F.,Sansbelló, R. M. F.,Pujolras, G. A.,Planella, J. P.,Roura-Pascual, N.,Martínez, J. J. S.,Moreno, L. M.(2014).Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,39(5),592-610.
11. Lu, J.,Law, N.(2012).Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback.Instruction Science,40,257-275.
12. Nicol, D. J.,Macfarlane-Dick, D.(2006).Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice.Studies in Higher Education,31(2),199-218.
13. Pintrich, P. R.(2002).The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing.Theory Into Practice,41(4),219-225.
14. Sadler, P. M.,Good, E.(2006).The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning.Educational Assessment,11(1),1-31.
15. Sendziuk, P.(2010).Sink or Swim?: Improving Student Learning through Feedback and Self-Assessment.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,22(3),320-30.
16. Stiggins, R.,Chappuis, J.(2012).An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning.Pearson Education. Inc.
17. Suen, H. K.(2014).Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs).The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,15(3)
18. Sung, Y. T.,Chang, K. E.,Chang, T. H.,Yu, W. C.(2010).How many heads are better than one? The reliability and validity of teenagers self-and peer assessments.Journal of Adolescence,33,135-145.
19. Topping, K.(2009).Peer assessment.Theory Into Practice,48,20-27.
20. Topping, K.(1998).Peer assessment between students in college and university.Review of Educational Research,68(3),249-276.
21. Weaver, D.,Esposto, A.(2012).Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,37(7),805-816.
22. Wen, M. L.,Tsai, C. C.(2006).University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment.Higher Education,51,27-44.
23. 林金錫、舒兆民、周中天、陳浩然、連育仁(2007)。Moodle 在華語文教學上之運用。第五屆全球華文網路教育研討會，台北:
24. 黃淑玲(2013)。從知識到可觀察的能力： 評估學習成效的策略與建議。評鑑雙月刊，44
25. 劉旨峰、楊國鑫、林珊如、袁賢銘(2003)。中學生與網路同儕互評之預測性研究。新竹師院學報，17，51-71。

1. 許佩玲、易正義(2016)。臉書社群有助於翻轉教學。亞東學報，36，63-82。
2. 鍾智林,潘嘉宜(2019)。以Moodle日誌探索英語授課修課生之數位學習歷程。課程與教學，22(4)，123-150。