日常執行功能行為量表之發展與其因素結構及信效度研究

Development of the Daily Executive Behaviors Scale: Five-Factor Solution, Reliability, and Validity

10.6550/ACP.200912_4(2).0002

吳玉欣(Yu-Hsin Wu)；余麗樺(Li-Fa Yu)；陳靖(Ching Chen)；郭乃文(Nai-Wen Guo)

日常執行功能行為 ； 額葉損傷 ； daily executive behaviour ； frontal-damaged

臨床心理學刊

4卷2期（2009 / 12 / 01）

86 - 94

繁體中文

目的：近年學者以使用評估執行功能缺損問卷之方式來標記患者行為表現層次之監控問題，以彌補傳統診間施行神經心理測驗之不足。因此本研究發展適用於本土使用的日常執行功能行為量表，並檢驗本量表之因素結構與信效度，以協助臨床工作者瞭解患者執行功能障礙之行為表徵。方法：本研究整理國外的執行功能異常問卷、本研究之研究團隊之臨床行為觀察、照顧者之抱怨等資料編製初步量表，經過專家評估修改後，收集179位腦傷與非腦傷患者資料進行因素分析，得到五個因素，另加入100位失智症、腦損傷患者與正常受試資料進行信效度與量表適用性考驗。結果：日常執行功能行為量表共21題，其中包括：因素一「動機控制因素」、因素二「計畫性因素」、因素三「情緒監控因素」、因素四「社交抑制因素」和因素五「環境互動監控因素」等五個因素。本量表與其各因素之內部一致性良好且可以有效區辨臨床組與正常組之表現差異。結論：本量表共包含五個因素，具有良好的信效度，並呈現額葉損傷、非額葉損傷與失智症等不同臨床診斷組之表現，為適用於臨床使用之日常執行功能行為量表。

Objective: The executive dysfunction exhibited in brain-damaged patients is a severe sequela. However, current neuropsychological tests cannot assess executive dysfunction completely due to its various manifestations. The purposes of this study were to develop an executive behavior scale for screening unusual behaviors that would accompany dysexecutive syndromes and to examine the factor structure, reliability and validity of the scale.Method: The initial items were constructed based on authors' clinical observations, reviews of relevant literature, and contents on the dysexecutive scale. A panel of experts was then asked to evaluate the content coverage, complexity, clarity and relevance of the items. The items were further trimmed by conducting item analysis and factor analysis on response data of 179 subjects rated by their caregivers. One hundred subject data were added to further assess the reliability and validity of the scale.Resulst: The final executive behavior scale consisted of 21 items. The five factors extracted from the scale were as follows: motivation control, planning, emotion control, inhibition of social interaction, and environment monitor. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was .91, which indicated good internal consistency. Furthermore, the scale was shown to be able to discriminate between the frontal-damaged, nonfrontal-damaged, dementia, and normal subjects.Conclusion: The five-factor executive behavior scale appears to possess good reliability and validity. It could be used in assessing executive dysfunction in clinical population in Taiwan.

1. Alexander, G. E.,Delong, M. R.,Strick, P. L.(1986).Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex.Annual Review of Neuroscience,9,357-381.
2. Anderson, S. W.,Damasio, H.,Tranel, D.(1990).Neuropsychological impairments associated with lesions caused by tumor or stroke.Archives of Neurology,47,397-405.
3. Ardila, A.(2008).On the evolutionary origins of executive functions.Brain and Cognition,68,92-99.
4. Baddeley, A.,Sala, S. D.,Papagno, C.,Spinnler, H.(1997).Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion.Neuropsychology,11,187-194.
5. Beloosesky, Y.,Streifler, J. Y.,Burstin, A.,Grinblat, J.(1995).The importance of brain infarct size and location in predicting outcome after stroke.Age and Aging,24,515-518.
6. Boller, F.(Ed.),Spinnler, H.(Ed.),Hendler, J. A.(Ed.)(1994).Handbook of Neuropsychology.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
7. Chan, R.C.,Bode, R.K.(2008).Analysis of patient and proxy ratings on the dysexecutive questionnaire: an application of Rasch analysis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,79,86-88.
8. Code, C.(Ed.),Wallesch, C. W.(Ed.),Joanette, Y.(Ed.),Lecours, R.(Ed.)(1996).Classic Cases in Neuropsychology.Psychology Press.
9. Coolidge, F. L.,Griego, J. A.(1995).Executive functions of the Frontal lobes: Psychometric properties of a self-rating scale.Psychological Reports,77,24-26.
10. Diamond, B. J.,DeLuca, J.,Kelly, S. M.(1997).Memory and executive function in amnesic and non-amnesic patients with aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery.Brain,20,1015-1025.
11. Eslinger, P. J.,Grattan, L. M.,Damasio, H.,Damasio, A. R.(1992).Developmental consequences of childhood frontal lobe damage.Archives of Neurology,49,764-769.
12. Foong, J.,Rozewicz, L.,Quaghebeur, G.(1997).Executive function in multiple sclerosis- The role of frontal lobe pathology.Brain,120,15-26.
13. Gerstorf, D.,Siedlecki, K. L.,Tucker-Drob, E. M.,Salthouse, T. A.(2008).Executive dysfunctions across adulthood: measurement properties and correlates of the DEX self-report questionnaire.Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition,15,424-445.
14. Gioia, G. A.,Isquith, P. K.(2004).Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury.Developmental neuropsychology,25,135-158.
15. Lafleche, G.,Albert, M. S.(1995).Executive function deficits in mild Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychology,9,313-320.
16. Levin, H. S.,Culhane, K.,Mendelsohn, D.,Lilly, M. A.,Bruce, D.(1993).Cognitive in relation to magnetic resonance imaging in head-injured children and adolescents.Archives of Neurology,50,897-905.
17. Lezak, M. D.(2004).Neuropsychological assessment.New York:Oxford University Press.
18. Lin, R. T.,Lai, C. L.,Tai, C. T.,Liu, C. K.,Howng, S. L.(1998).Cranial computed tomography in ischemic stroke patients with and with and without dementia - a prospective study.The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences,14,203-211.
19. Malloy, P.,Grace, J.(2005).A review of rating scales for measuring behavior change due to frontal systems damage.Cognitive and Behavoral Neurology,18,18-27.
20. Mooney, B.,Walmsley, C.,McFarland, K.(2006).Factor analysis of the self-report dysexecutive (DEX-S) questionnaire.Applied Neuropsychology,13(1),12-18.
21. Shinagawa, Y.,Nakaaki, S.,Hongo, J.,Murata, Y.,Sato, J.,Matsui, T.,Tatsumi, H.,Akechi, T.,Furukawa, T. A.(2007).Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) in Alzheimer's disease: validation of a behavioral rating scale to assess dysexecutive symptoms in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease.International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,22,951-956.
22. Stuss, D. T.,Benson, D. F.(1986).The frontal lobes.Raven Press.
23. Wilson, B. A.,Alderman, N.,Burgess, P. W.,Emsile, H.,Evans, J. J.(1996).Behavioural Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome.Thames Valley Test Company.
24. Wilson, B. A.,Evans, J. J.,Emsile, H.,Alderman, N.,Burgess, P. W.(1998).The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome.Neuropsychological rehabilitation,8,213-228.
25. 郭乃文(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，台灣大學心理學研究所。

1. 蔡青霖,許育軒,林慧麗,Thorell, Lisa B.,Siu, Angela F. Y.(2020)。Taiwanese Traditional-Chinese Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory: Revision, Investigation of Psychometric Properties, and Establishing of Norms。測驗學刊，67(2)，119-143。
2. 郭乃文,許立港,李婕寧(2018)。青少女高身心症狀抱怨、生活適應與執行功能之關聯探討。臨床心理學刊，12(1/2)，1-14。
3. 郭乃文、許立港、張凱茵(2014)。強化執行功能之團體神經心理治療的成效研究—以高身體症狀青少女為例。中華心理衛生學刊，27(1)，73-95。
4. 黃睿謙、郭乃文、許立港(2014)。提升執行功能之神經心理團體治療於高身心症狀抱怨青少女之效果。臨床心理學刊，8(2)，41-56。
5. 黃睿謙、郭乃文、許立港(2014)。提升執行功能之神經心理團體治療於高身心症狀抱怨青少女之效果。臨床心理學刊，8(2)，41-56。
6. 廖御圻,詹雅雯,楊建銘,郭乃文,許文耀,姜忠信,花茂棽,林耀盛,林宜美,吳英璋,王韋婷(2019)。科學家與實務者：台灣臨床心理學的共時性顧後瞻前。中華心理學刊，61(4)，361-392。
7. 蘇倍儀,郭進榮,郭乃文,周偉倪(2023)。個案報告：整合性神經心理治療於重度創傷性腦傷患者之成效。臨床心理學刊，17(1/2)，29-43。
8. 蘇倍儀、廖御圻、黃冠堂、郭乃文、林育岑(2016)。運用神經回饋訓練之神經心理治療模組於重度腦傷患者改善執行功能效果分析－個案報告。臨床心理學刊，10(2)，31-49。
9. 游勝翔、林緯倫(2018)。「中文版執行功能指標」（大學生版與國中生版）的編製與其信效度報告。測驗學刊，65(1)，29-67。