第二版明尼蘇達多向人格測驗在台灣的適用性：前導性研究

A Pilot Study Investigating the Adaptability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in Taiwan

10.6550/ACP.201812_12(1_2).0002

張吏頡(Li-Chieh Chang)；陳玟娟(Wen-Jiuan Chen)；周廷璽(Ting-Hsi Chou)；蘇文碩(Wen-So Su)

第二版明尼蘇達多向人格測驗 ； 台灣 ； Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 ； Taiwan

臨床心理學刊

12卷1/2期（2018 / 12 / 01）

15 - 34

繁體中文

目的：探查香港中文大學出版之繁體中文第二版明尼蘇達多向人格測驗（Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, MMPI-2）在台使用情形，以做為後續研究該測驗在台心理計量屬性之基礎。方法：由48位來自台灣、香港、澳門和馬來西亞的受試者填寫MMPI-2、健康性格習慣量表、第二版貝克憂鬱量表、貝克焦慮量表，並在間隔至少兩週後再次完成MMPI-2。結果：繁體中文版MMPI-2可同時適用於慣用國語和粵語的受試者，本次檢視的34個量尺在台灣具可接受之信度，當中26個量尺的效度獲得支持，其餘量尺則因缺乏適當效標而無法檢視其效度。結論：本研究為繁體中文版MMPI-2在台灣的適用性帶來正向初步結論，惟本次因經費有限導致研究樣本較小且同質性高，故後續研究需增加樣本代表性與人數以提升結果的類化程度。

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the adaptability of Traditional Chinese version of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) published by the Chinese University Press when it was administered in Taiwan, so that the results of this study could be utilized as a foundation for future research that explores the psychometric properties of this instrument. Methods: Forty-eight participants from Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, and Malaysia were recruited to complete the MMPI-2, Health, Personality, and Habit Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and Beck Anxiety Inventory. They also had to wait at least two weeks to fill out the MMPI-2 again to obtain their retest scores. Results: Statistics showed that the Traditional Chinese version of MMPI-2 could be applied to both Cantonese and Taiwanese Mandarin Speaking participants. In addition, the 34 MMPI-2 scales examined in this study were demonstrated to have acceptable reliability, and 26 of them were found to be valid, but the rest needs further investigations since they could not be compared with comparable criterion measures at this time. Conclusion: Our preliminary but promising research outcomes support the adaptability of the Traditional Chinese version of the MMPI-2 in Taiwan. However, our homogeneous and small samples resulted from a low budget might have compromised the conclusions drawn from this study. Thus, more research with larger and more representative samples is needed to clarify the generalizability of our findings.

1. 柯永河(2008)。「台灣臨床心理學的濫觴、發展與願景。應用心理研究，40，29-58。
   連結：
2. 許秋田,黃創華,鄭志強(2009)。台灣臨床心理師執業與工作現況調查。應用心理研究，41，43-55。
   連結：
3. Barlow, D. H.,Durand, V. M.(2015).Abnormal psychology: An integrative approach.Stamford, CT:Cengage Learning.
4. Butcher, J. N.(2011).A beginner's guide to the MMPI-2.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
5. Butcher, J. N.,Graham, J. R.,Ben-Porath, Y. S.,Tellegen, A.,Dahlstrom, W. G.,Kaemmer, B.(2001).MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (Rev. ed.).Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
6. Butcher, J. N.,Williams, C. L.(2009).Personality assessment with the MMPI-2: Historical roots, international adaptations, and current challenges.Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being,1,105-135.
7. Chang, Y.-T.,Tam, W.-C. C.,Shiah, Y.-J.,Chiang, S.-K.(2017).A pilot study on the Chinese Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in detecting feigned mental disorders: Simulators classified by using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.PsyCh Journal,6,175-184.
8. Cheung, F. M.,Zhang, J. X.,Song, W. Z.(2003).Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) (Chinese language edition) manual.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
9. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Friedman, A. F.,Bolinskey, P. K.,Levak, R. W.,Nichols, D. S.(2015).Psychological assessment with the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF.New York:Routledge.
11. Gliner, J. A.,Morgan, G. A.,Leech, N. L.(2017).Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis.New York:Routledge.
12. Graham, J. R.(2012).MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology.New York:Oxford University Press.
13. Hassan, Z. A.,Schattner, P.,Mazza, D.(2006).Doing a pilot study: Why is it essential?.Malaysian Family Physician,1,70-73.
14. Hofstede Insight. (n.d.). Country comparison. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/hong-kong,taiwan/
15. Hofstede, G.(2001).Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Hofstede, G.(2011).Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede Model in context.Online Readings in Psychology and Culture,2
17. Kaeding, M. P.(2011).Identity formation in Taiwan and Hong Kong: How much difference, how much similarities?.Taiwanese identity in the 21st century: Domestic, regional and global perspectives,Abingdon, UK:
18. Klein, D. N.,Kotov, R.,Bufferd, S. J.(2011).Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the evidence.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,7,269-295.
19. Kwan, K.-L. K.(1999).MMPI and MMPI-2 performance of the Chinese: Cross-cultural applicability.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,30,260-268.
20. Leu, W.-H.,Ko, Y.-H.,Chen, W.-Y.(1966).A preliminary report of the tryout of MMPI on the freshmen of National Taiwan University.Acta Psychologica Taiwanica,8,79-84.
21. Nichols, D. S.(2011).Essentials of MMPI-2 assessment.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
22. Shih, F.-L.,Jones, C.(2014).Introduction to Taiwan and Hong Kong in comparative perspective: Centres-peripheries, colonialism, and the politics of representation.Taiwan in Comparative Perspective,5,1-20.
23. Stevens, M. J.,Kwan, K.-L.,Graybill, D.(1993).Comparison of MMPI-2 scores of foreign Chinese and Caucasian-American students.Journal of Clinical Psychology,49,23-27.
24. Streiner, D. L.,Norman, G. R.(2008).Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use.New York:Oxford University Press.
25. Taber, K. S.(2018).The use of Cronbach's Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education.Research in Science Education,48,1273-1296.
26. Tsai, D. C.,Pike, P. L.(2000).Effects of acculturation on the MMPI-2 scores of Asian American students.Journal of Personality Assessment,74,216-230.
27. 包重齡(1956)。「MMPI 是什麼」。測驗年刊，4，289-293。
28. 石定栩,邵敬敏,朱志瑜(2014).港式中文與標準中文的比較.香港:香港教育.
29. 吳英璋,許文耀,翁嘉英(2001).臨床心理師現況分析與未來需求研究.台北市:行政院衛生署.
30. 車先蕙,盧孟良,陳錫中,張尚文,李宇宙(2006)。中文版貝克焦慮量表之信效度」。台灣醫學，10，447-454。
31. 柯永河(2001).臨床心理學：心理診斷.台北市:文笙.
32. 柯永河,張小鳳(1999).健康、性格、習慣量表指導手冊（ 修訂版HPH-1999）.台北市:測驗.
33. 張文雄(1975)。東海大學一年級新生之MMPI 分數與其學業成績間的相關之研究。東海學報，16，157-166。
34. 張建新,宋維真,張妙清(2004).明尼蘇達多相人格測驗（第二版）（MMPI-2）中文（簡體字）版用戶手冊.北京市:地質.
35. 路君約(1967)。明尼蘇塔多相人格測驗的修訂。心理與教育學報，1，20-36。
36. 路君約(1965)。修訂MMPI的初步報告。測驗年刊，12，132-143。
37. 盧孟良,車先蕙,張尚文,沈武典(2002)。中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之信度和效度。台灣精神醫學，16，301-310。