题名

魏氏兒童智力測驗第四版簡式版本於低智能兒童之效度分析

并列篇名

Validity of the WISC-IV Short Form in Children With Low Intellegence

DOI

10.6550/ACP.201912_13(1_2).0001

作者

張雅綺(Ya-Chi Chang);黃思賓(Sih-Pin Huang);張遠芳(Yuan-Fang Chang);梁庭瑋(Ting-Wei Liang);徐儷瑜(Li-Yu Shyu)

关键词

智能低下 ; 臨界智能 ; 簡版 ; 魏氏兒童智力測驗 ; intellectual disability ; borderline intellectual functioning ; short forms ; WISC-IV

期刊名称

臨床心理學刊

卷期/出版年月

13卷1/2期(2019 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 12

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目的:檢驗魏氏兒童智力測驗第四版(Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition, WISC-IV)四因子簡式版本,應用於智能低下或臨界智能學齡兒童的效度。方法:167位6-12歲兒童,接受WISC-IV完整版智力測驗後,分為智能低下組(全量表實際智商 [full scale intelligence quotient, FSIQ] < 69, n = 35)和臨界智能組(FSIQ = 70-84, n = 132)。再以WISC-IV中的「類同─矩陣推理─數字序列─符號尋找」和「類同─矩陣推理─記憶廣度─符號尋找」形成兩種簡式版本,以線性轉換法與比例估計法推估全智商,比較完整版實際智商與簡短版估計智商之間的相關係數和平均數F檢定。結果:有69%智能低下組兒童及33%臨界智能組兒童無法完成數字序列分測驗,顯示「類同─矩陣推理─數字序列─符號尋找」不適用於智力功能較弱兒童。而「類同─矩陣推理─記憶廣度─符號尋找」簡短版,在智能低下組兒童,不論是線性估計法或比例推估法之估計智商,與實際智商的相關係數都在.82以上,且估計智商與實際智商之間的平均數無顯著差異,顯示「類同─矩陣推理─記憶廣度─符號尋找」簡短版對智能低下兒童是相對較適合的選擇。結論:智能低下組學齡兒童可採用「類同─矩陣推理─記憶廣度─符號尋找」簡短版估計全量表智商;但對臨界智能組兒童,則建議採用WISC-IV完整版智力測驗評估其智力功能。

英文摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV) tetrad short-forms in children with intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning. Methods: One hundred and sixty-seven children aged 6 to 12 years old were administered the full-scale WISC-IV. They were divided into low intelligence group (full scale intelligence quotient [FSIQ] < 69, n = 35) and borderline intelligence group (FSIQ = 70-84, n = 132). The WISC-IV scaled scores on the following subtests were used to derive two tetrad short-forms scores. One short-form included Similarities, Matrix Reasoning, Letter Number Sequencing, and Symbol Search. Another short-form included Similarities, Matrix Reasoning, Digit Span, and Symbol Search. The short-form FSIQs were estimated by prorated method and linear transformation. The correlations and F-tests between actual and estimated FSIQ were calculated for validity analysis. Results: There were 69% children with low intelligence and 33% children with borderline IQ cannot finish the Letter Number Sequencing subtest. The results indicated that the Similarities-Matrix Reasoning-Letter Number Sequencing-Symbol Search short form was not applicable for children with low to borderline intellectual function. However, the Similarities-Matrix Reasoning-Digit Span-Symbol Search short form indicated well correlations between estimated FSIQ calculated by prorated method or linear transformation and the actual FSIQ in children with intellectual disability (r > .82). Moreover, there were no significant differences between estimated FSIQs and actual FSIQs. Thus, the Similarities-Matrix Reasoning-Digit Span-Symbol Search short form was considered as an optimal option for children with intellectual disability. Conclusion: The Similarities-Matrix Reasoning-Digit Span-Symbol Search short form was applicable to estimate FSIQ in children with low intelligence. However, for children with borderline intelligence, WISC-IV full scales were suggested to use to evaluate their intellectual function.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. 陳心怡,花茂棽,張本聖,陳榮華(2011)。以「魏氏兒童智力量表」(第四版)的四因素為基礎之簡式版本分析:臨床應用指引。測驗學刊,58(4),585-611。
    連結:
  2. 陳心怡,楊宗仁,朱建軍,張本聖(2002)。WISC-III 簡式「多重版本—多重樣本—多重方法」之智商估計效度研究。測驗年刊,49(2),155-182。
    連結:
  3. Alloway, T. P.(2010).Working memory and executive function profiles of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,54(5),448-456.
  4. American Psychiatric Association(2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
  5. American Psychiatric Association(1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
  6. Cornoldi, C.,Giofrè, D.,Orsini, A.,Pezzuti, L.(2014).Differences in the intellectual profile of children with intellectual vs. learning disability.Research in Developmental Disabilities,35(9),2224-2230.
  7. Crawford, J. R.,Anderson, V.,Rankin, P. M.,MacDonald, J.(2010).An index-based short-form of the WISC-IV with accompanying analysis of the reliability and abnormality of differences.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,49(2),235-258.
  8. Donders, J.,Axelrod, B. N.(2002).Two-subtest estimations of WAIS-III factor index scores.Psychological Assessment,14(3),360-364.
  9. Donders, J.,Elzinga, B.,Kuipers, D.,Helder, E.,Crawford, J. R.(2013).Development of an eight-subtest short form of the WISC-IV and evaluation of its clinical utility in children with traumatic brain injury.Child Neuropsychology,19(6),662-670.
  10. Emerson, E.,Einfeld, S.,Stancliffe, R. J.(2010).The mental health of young children with intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,45(5),579-587.
  11. Hrabok, M.,Brooks, B. L.,Fay-McClymont, T. B.,Sherman, E. M.(2014).Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition (WISC-IV) short-form validity: A comparison study in pediatric epilepsy.Child Neuropsychology,20(1),49-59.
  12. McKenzie, K.,Murray, A. L.,Murray, K. R.,Murray, G. C.(2014).Assessing the accuracy of the WISC-IV seven-subtest short form and the child and adolescent intellectual disability screening questionnaire in identifying intellectual disability in children.Child Neuropsychology,20(3),372-377.
  13. Mumpower, D. L.(1964).The fallacy of the short form.Journal of Clinical Psychology,20(1),111-113.
  14. Murray, A. L.,McKenzie, K.,Murray, G. C.(2016).An evaluation of the performance of the WISC-IV eight-subtest short form with children who may have an intellectual disability.Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,41(1),50-53.
  15. Nouwens, P. J. G.,Lucas, R.,Embregts, P. J. C. M.,van Nieuwenhuizen, C.(2017).In plain sight but still invisible: A structured case analysis of people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,42(1),36-44.
  16. Nouwens, P. J. G.,Lucas, R.,Smulders, N. B. M.,Embregts, P. J. C. M.,van Nieuwenhuizen, C.(2017).Identifying classes of persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A latent class analysis.BMC Psychiatry,17,257.
  17. Pulina, F.,Lanfranchi, S.,Henry, L.,Vianello, R.(2019).Intellectual profile in school-aged children with borderline intellectual functioning.Research in Developmental Disabilities,95,103498.
  18. Sadock, B. J. (ed.),Sadock, V. A. (ed.),Ruiz, P. (ed.)(2009).Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  19. Silverstein, A. B. (1898). Agreement between a short form and the full scale as a function of the correlation between them. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(6), 929–931. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198911)45:6<929::AID-JCLP2270450616>3.0.CO;2-C
  20. Van der Molen, M. J,Van Luit, J. E. H.,Jongmans, M. J.,Van der Molen, M. W.(2009).Memory profiles in children with mild intellectual disabilities: Strengths and weaknesses.Research in Developmental Disabilities,30(6),1237-1247.
  21. Wechsler, D.(2003).Wechsler intelligence scale for children.The Psychological Corporation.
  22. Whitaker, S.(2008).WISC-IV and low IQ: Review and comparison with the WAIS-III.Educational Psychology in Practice,24(2),129-137.
  23. 陳心怡(2018).魏氏兒童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)中文版:技術和解釋手冊.中國行為科學社.
  24. 陳榮華,陳心怡(2007).魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)中文版:技術和解釋手冊.中國行為科學社.
  25. 衛生福利部統計處(2017a 年 5 月 6 日)。身心障礙者人數按類別及年齡別分。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-2976-13825-113.html
  26. 衛生福利部統計處(2017b 年 5 月 9 日)。身心障礙者人數按季。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-2976-13815-113.html