影像的博物館人類學視角與理論意涵

Theoretical Implications on Practice of Visual Anthropology-Also on Museum Perspectives

10.29777/JCR.201112.0002

楊翎(Lin Yang)

影像 ； 視覺人類學 ； 視覺理論 ； 人類學博物館 ； 博物館展示 ； Images ； Visual anthropology ； Theories of vision ； Anthropological museum ； Exhibitions in museums

文資學報

6期（2011 / 12 / 01）

29 - 59

繁體中文

影像在博物館展示上，一直扮演著文化詮釋與意義溝通的媒介。然而，影像本質的複雜性及主導影像詮釋背後的權力關係，已遠超越過去「人類學博物館」對影像的理解。當代博物館作為世界文化視窗，總挾帶著西方現代與後現代主義的觀念，筆者以為藉由博物館內跨時空觀看模式的複雜性探討，將有助於理解博物館如何回應社會變遷、文化調適與數位科技等衝擊。而且，透過視覺人類學理論與博物館展示的對話，或可嘗試釐清影像本質與再現的意涵；同時，將博物館當作一種變遷場域或視角來思考，亦可化解傳統文字為主的民族誌書寫與再現危機。在本文中，擬將視覺影像再置於博物館的脈絡中，探討人類學博物館在不同時期、面對不同群體時所隱藏的再現和詮釋議題，從幾個向度作論述，包括：（1）影像的符號學，（2）寫實、真實與想像，（3）複製、再現與意識形態，（4）影像、文字與敘事；以上四個面向，旨在突顯當代影像觀看之於人類學博物館實踐脈絡中的反思價值。

Image has played a role as crucial media of cultural interpretation and meaning in the contemporary museum exhibitions. However, the complexities of image nature and dominant power relations behind the image interpretation have gone far beyond perception of image in the so-called ”Anthropological Museum” of the past. Modern museum is considered as window to the world with the concept of Modernism and Post-Modernism. Via research on the complexity of cross-time and space viewing patterns inside the museum, it would help to think how Taiwan's museums could respond to the impacts caused by digital technology, social transformation and trans-cultural adaptation. We believe that dialogues between the visual anthropology theory and practical museum exhibition could clarify the meanings of image nature and representations. In addition, while viewing museums as studying perspectives or fields of transformation, the dialogues are effective on relief of crisis of ethnographic writing and representation dominated by traditional text. Accordingly, this paper urges to replace visual images into the museum context for deliberation of the hidden representation and interpretation issues as Anthropological museum is situated in different stages and facing different groups. The elaboration of this paper is organized as four dimensions: (1) image semiology; (2) realism, truth and imagination; (3) replication, representation and ideology; (4) images, words and description. These four dimensions aim at stressing the introspection value of contemporary image viewing within the implementation context of Anthropological museum.

1. 林文玲(2001)。米酒加鹽巴：「原住民影片」的再現政治。臺灣社會研究季刊，43，197-234。
   連結：
2. 胡台麗(2006)。臺灣原住民民族誌影片的新貌。博物館學季刊，20(4)，59-72。
   連結：
3. 劉紀蕙編(2002)。文化研究的視覺系統。中外文學，30(12)，12-23。
   連結：
4. Ruby, Jay 2011 Franz Boas and Early Camera Study of Behavior. Electronic document, http://astro.temple.edu/~ruby/ruby/boas.html. Accessed January 16.
5. Taylor and Francis Group 2006 Journal Details: Visual Anthropology. Electronic document, http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/08949468.asp. Accessed June 1.
6. Anderson, Christian Alan 2007 Theories of the Visual in Anthropology: Reflections on Visual Representation in Theory and Practice. Electronic document, http://omnivoyage.org/Theories_of_visual_anthropology.htm#_1. Accessed March 1.
7. Read, Charles Hercules 1899 Prefatory Note: Ethnography. Notes and Queries on Anthropology. London: BAAS.
8. 李道明 2007 〈爭議性與影響力十足的羅伯．嘉納與他的經典作《死鳥》〉。網路資源，http://www.tieff.sinica.edu.tw/ch/2007/part/part5_41.html，檢索日期，10 月30 日。
9. 森丑之助 2011 〈順益臺灣原住民博物館大事記要〉。網路資源，http://www.museum.org.tw/014.htm，檢索日期，3 月5 日。
10. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1940 The Nuer. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
11. Shinie [Anonymous] 2007 《閱讀筆記：博物館的文化政治解剖學》。Electronic document, http://accesstoshinie.blogspot.com/2006/01/blog-post_113734791853759955.html. Accessed January 16.
12. (1973).The Interpretation of Cultures.New York:Basic Books.
13. 萬蓓琪 2007 〈三種關於真實的影像實驗〉。網路資源，http://iwebs.url.com.tw/main/html/filmism/000901a.htm，檢索日期，9 月5 日。
14. Benedict, Ruth 1946 The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company.
15. The Society for Visual Anthropology（SVA） 2007 The Society for Visual Anthropology. Electronic document, http://www.societyforvisualanthropology.org/svawelcome.html. Accessed June 1.
16. 朱剛 2005 〈想像、再現與重複：Derrida 對胡塞爾關於實在話語與想像話語之區分的解構及其意義〉。 網路資源，http://www.jdsx.org/papers/050320zhu.htm，檢索日期，1 月5 日。
17. (2005)。臺灣國際民族誌影展－家的變奏。臺北:臺灣民族誌影像學會。
18. 蔡政良 2006 〈我與我的人類學〉。網路資源，http://www.oz.nthu.edu.tw/~d929802/anthropology/index.htm，檢索日期，5 月5 日。
19. 戴麗卿 2007 〈數位媒體科技 VS. 藝術意識形態〉。網路資源，http://navigator.digiarts.org.tw/lounge/pdf/li-qing-dai.pdf，檢索日期，5 月8 日。
20. Ames, Michael M.(1992).Cannibal Tours and Glass Boxes: The Anthropology of Museums.Vancouver:University of British Columbia Press.
21. Ames, Michael M.(1986).Museums, the Public and Anthropology.Vancouver:University of British Columbia Press..
22. Asch, Timothy,Connor, Linda,Asch, Patsy(1996).Jero Tapakan: Balinese Healer. An Ethnographic Film Monograph.Los Angeles:Ethnographics Press.
23. Bal, Mieke(2005).The Commitment to Look.Journal of Visual Culture,4(2),145-162.
24. Bal, Mieke(2003).Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture.Journal of Visual Culture,2(1),5-32.
25. Banta, Melissa,Hinsley, Curtis M.(1986).From Site to Sight: Anthropology, Photography and the Power of Imagery.Cambridge:Peabody Museum Press.
26. Barthes, Roland(1984).Writing Degree Zero and Elements of Semiology.London:Jonathan Cape.
27. Barthes, Roland,Coverdale, Linda(trans.)(1985).The Grain of the Voice: Interview, 1962-1980.Berkeley:University of California Press..
28. Barthes, Roland、許綺玲譯(1997)。明室：攝影札記。臺北:臺灣攝影工作室。
29. Baudrillard, Jean(1988).The Evil Demon of Images.Australia:Power Institute.
30. Benjamin, Walter,Zohn, Harry(trans.)(1979).Illuminations.Glasgow:Fontana.
31. Bennett, Tony(1995).The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics.London:Routledge.
32. Berger, John(1972).Ways of Seeing.London:BBC Publications..
33. Berger, John、Jean, Mohr、張世倫譯(2007)。另一種影像敘事。臺北:三言社。
34. Bouquet, Mary(2000).Thinking and Doing Otherwise: Anthropological Theory in Exhibitionary Practice.Ethnos,65(2),217-36.
35. Bourdieu, Pierre(1988).Homo Academicus.Cambridge:Polity Press.
36. Bourdieu, Pierre(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
37. Bourdieu, Pierre(1965).Photography: A Middle-Brow Art.Cambridge:Polity Press.
38. Cardozo, Christopher(2005).Sacred Legacy: Edward D. Curtis and the North American Indian.Burlington:Verve Editions, Ltd..
39. Clifford, James(1988).The Predicament of Culture.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
40. Clifford, James(ed.),Marcus, George(ed.)(1986).Writing Culture: the Poetics and the Politics of Ethnography.Berkeley:University of California Press.
41. Coombes, Annie(1994).Reinventing Africa: Museum, Material Culture and Popular Imagination.New Haven:Yale University Press.
42. Crary, Jonathan(1996).Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century.London:MIT Press.
43. Crawford, Peter Ian(ed.),Turton, David(ed.)(1992).Film as Ethnography.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
44. Derrida, Jacques、杜小真譯(1999)。聲音與現象。北京:商務印書館。
45. Eco, Umberto(1984).Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language.London:Macmillan.
46. Eco, Umberto,Burgin, Victor(ed.)(1982).Critique of the Image. In Thinking Photography.London:MacMillian Press.
47. Edwards, Elizabeth(2001).Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology and Museums.Oxford:Berg Publishers.
48. Edwards, Elizabeth(ed.)(1992).Anthropology & Photography, 1860-1920.New Haven:Yale University Press..
49. Evans, Jessica(ed.),Hall, Stuart(ed.)(1999).Visual Culture: the Reader.London:Sage Publications.
50. Fabian, Johannes(1983).Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object.New York:Columbia University Press.
51. Fabian, Johannes(1990).Presence and Representation: the Other and Anthropological Writing.Critical Inquiry,16(4),753-772.
52. Fanon, Frantz、陳瑞樺譯(2007)。黑皮膚，白面具。臺北:心靈工坊文化事業。
53. Feuerbach, Ludwig,Eliot, George(trans.)(1989).The Essence of Christianity.New York:Prometheus Books.
54. Firth, Raymond(1995).We, the Tikopia.Boston:Bescon Press.
55. Foucault, Michael,Sheridan, Alan(trans.)(1995).Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.New York:Vintage.
56. Foucault, Michael、劉絮愷譯(1994)。臨床醫學的誕生。臺北:時報文化。
57. Geertz, Clifford(1983).Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology.New York:Basic Books.
58. Gillian, Rose、王國強譯(2006)。視覺研究導論：影像的思考。臺北:群學。
59. Grinshaw, Anna(2001).the Ethnographer's Eye.London:Cambridge University Press.
60. Hall, Sturat(ed.)(1997).Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.London:Sage Publications.
61. Heider, Karl G.(1976).Ethnographic Film.Austin:University of Texas Press.
62. Hockings, Paul(ed.)(1995).Principles of Visual Anthropology.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyte..
63. Hockings, Paul(ed.)(1995).Principles of Visual Anthropology.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
64. Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean(1992).Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge.London:Routledge.
65. Ivins, William(1953).Prints and Visual Communication.London:Routledge.
66. Kano、 Tadao,Segawa, Kokichi(1956).An Illustrated Ethnography of Formosan Aborigines Vol. 1 The Yami.Tokyo:Maruzen Company, Ltd..
67. Kavanagh, Gaynor(ed.)(1991).Museum Languages.London:Leicester University Press.
68. Lechte, John、王志弘譯、劉亞蘭譯、郭貞伶譯(2000)。當代五十大師。臺北:巨流圖書。
69. Lefebvre, Henri(1991).The Production of Space.London:Blackwell.
70. Levi-Strauss, Claude(1976).Structural Anthropology.New York:Basic Books.
71. Levi-Strauss, Claude(1968).Structural Anthropology. Vol.1.London:Allen Lane.
72. Levi-Strauss, Claude(1953).Structural Anthropology.Anthropology Today,Chicago:
73. Lofland, Lyn(ed.)(2001).Handbook of Ethnography.London:Sage Press.
74. Loizos, Peter(1993).Innovation in Ethnographic Film.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
75. MacDougall, David、李惠芳譯、黃燕祺譯(2006)。邁向跨文化電影之路。臺北:麥田。
76. MacDougall, David、李惠芳譯、黃燕祺譯(2005)。邁向跨文化電影之路。臺北:麥田。
77. Malinowski, Bronislaw、于嘉雲譯(1991)。南海舡人。臺北:遠流。
78. Marcus, George E.(1990).The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage.Society for Visual Anthropology Review,6(1),2-44.
79. Marcus, George E.,Cushman, Dick(1982).Ethnographies as Texts.Annual Review of Anthropology,11,25-69.
80. Marcus, George E.,Fischer, Michael(1986).Anthropology as Cultural Critique.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
81. Marcuse, Herbert(1988).Soviet Marxism.New York:Columbia University Press.
82. Marx, Karl、伊海宇譯(1993)。經濟哲學手稿。臺北:時報文化。
83. Mead, Margaret(1951).Growth and Culture: a Photographic Study of Balinese Childhood.New York:Putnam.
84. Mirzoeff, Nicholas(1998).Visual Culture Reader.New York:Routledge.
85. Mirzoeff, Nicholas、陳芸芸譯(2004)。視覺文化導論 。臺北:韋伯文化。
86. Mitchell, William J. T.(1986).Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
87. Mitchell, William J. T.(1994).Picture Theory.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
88. Morphy, Howard(ed.),Banks, Marcus(ed.)(1997).Rethinking Visual Anthropology.New Haven:Yale University Press.
89. Peirce, Charles S.,Hope, James(ed.)(1991).Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotics.London::University of North Carolina Press.
90. Phillips, Ruth B.(ed.),Steiner, Christopher B.(ed.)(1999).Colonial Photography and Exhibitions: Representations of the ‘Native’ People and the Making of European Identities.London:Leicester University Press.
91. Piggott, Stuart(1978).Depicting Antiquity: Aspects of Archaeological Illustration.London::Thames and Hudso.
92. Postman, Neil、蔡承志譯(2007)。娛樂至死：追求表象、歡笑和激情的電視時代。臺北:貓頭鷹。
93. Renov, Michael(ed.)(1993).Theorizing Documentary.New York:Routledge.
94. Ruby, Jay(1975).Is an Ethnographic Film a Filmic Ethnography?.Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication,2(2),104-111.
95. Ruby, Jay(1980).Exposing Yourself: Reflexivity, Anthropology, and Film.Semiotica,30(1/2),153-179.
96. Sahlins, Marshall(1976).Culture and Practical Reason.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
97. Saussure, Ferdinand de,Salle, La(ed.)(1986).Course in General Linguistics.Chicago:Open Court Publishing Company.
98. Sheridan, Alain(trans.),Miller, Jacques-Alain(ed.)(1978).The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis.New York:W.W. Norton.
99. Simpson, Moira(1996).Representing Ourselves: Museums in the Post-Colonial Era.London:Routledge.
100. Smith, Philip、林宗德譯(2004)。文化理論的面貌。臺北:韋伯文化。
101. Sontag, Susan、黃翰荻譯(1997)。論攝影。臺北:唐山。
102. Storey, John、李根芳譯、周素鳳譯(2003)。文化理論與通俗文化導論。臺北:巨流。
103. Tagg, John(1991).The Burden of Representation: Essay on Photographies and Histories.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
104. Thomas, Ann(ed.)(1998).Beauty of Another Order: Photography in Science.New Haven:Yale University Press.
105. Turner, Victor(1983).Body, Brain, and Culture.Symposium on Ritual and Human Adaptation,Chicago:
106. Van Maanen, John(1988).Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography.Chicago:The Universityof Chicago Press.
107. Vergo, Peter(ed.)(1989).The New Museology.London:Reaktion.
108. Wollen, Peter(1969).Signs and Meaning in the Cinema.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
109. Young, Michael W.(1998).Malinowski’s Kirivina: Fieldwork Photography 1915-1918.Chicago:The Universityof Chicago Press.
110. 王經武(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東吳大學社會學研究所。
111. 吳瓊(2005)。視覺文化的奇景觀－視覺文化總論。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
112. 宋文薰(1994)。跨越世紀的影像：鳥居龍藏眼中的臺灣原住民。臺北:順益臺灣原住民博物館。
113. 林文玲(2002)。視覺性與人類學知識的條件。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，59，4-39。
114. 林文玲(2003)。臺灣原住民影片：轉化中的文化刻寫技術。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，61，145-176。
115. 林伯欣(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。輔仁大學比較文學研究所。
116. 邱天助(2004)。布爾迪厄文化再製理論。臺北:桂冠圖書。
117. 胡台麗(2003)。文化展演與臺灣原住民。臺北:聯經。
118. 胡台麗(1991)。民族誌電影之投影：兼述臺灣人類學影像實驗。中央研究院民族學研究所刊，71，183-208。
119. 國立臺灣博物館(2007)。神聖的遺產：愛德華寇帝斯美國印地安人影像特展。臺北:國立臺灣博物館。
120. 莊英章編(1992)。文化人類學。臺北:國立空中大學。
121. 陳光興(1991)。真實、再現、擬仿：布希亞的後現代媒體社會學。臺北：當代雜誌，65，18-29。
122. 鳥居龍藏(1990)。東京大學總合研究資料館所藏鳥居龍藏博士攝影寫真資料ｶﾀﾛｸﾞ。東京:東京大學。
123. 鳥居龍藏(1990)。東京大學總合研究資料館所藏鳥居龍藏博士攝影寫真資料ｶﾀﾛｸﾞ。東京:東京大學。
124. 鳥居龍藏、楊南郡譯(1996)。探險臺灣：鳥居龍藏的臺灣人類學之旅。臺北:遠流。
125. 森丑之助(1995)。臺灣蕃族圖譜。臺北:臨時臺灣舊慣調查會。
126. 順益臺灣原住民博物館(1994)。跨越世紀的影像：鳥居龍藏眼中的臺灣原住民。臺北:順益臺灣原住民博物館。
127. 楊翎(2011)。海角印象：劉其偉父子的新幾內亞行特展。國立自然科學博物館館訊，278，1。
128. 廖新田(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所。
129. 劉紀蕙(2006)。文化的視覺系統。臺北:麥田。
130. 劉紀蕙(2006)。文化的視覺系統。臺北:麥田。
131. 劉紀蕙編(2001)。他者之域－文化身分與再現策略。臺北:麥田。
132. 羅崗編、顧錚編(2004)。視覺文化讀本。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。

1. 吳佰祿(2017)。人類學歷史影像：以1900-60年代排灣族文身文手習俗影像為核心的探析。國立臺灣博物館學刊，70(2)，1-37。
2. 徐國明(2016)。靈性傳統的變遷與轉化─從胡臺麗民族誌影片析論文化媒體的「中介」實踐。東吳中文學報，32，271-292。