大學生博物館經驗初探：以觀眾認同與服務品質為核心

A Preliminary Visitor Study on College Students' Museum Experience: In the Views of Identity and Museum Service Quality

10.29777/JCR.201212.0002

殷寶寧(Pao-Ning Yin)

博物館觀眾研究 ； 博物館經驗 ； 認同 ； 博物館服務品質 ； 體驗經濟 ； Visitor studies ； Museum experience ； Identity ； Museum service quality ； Experience economy

文資學報

7期（2012 / 12 / 01）

47 - 81

繁體中文

隨著博物館轉向以人為主的經營方針，博物館觀眾研究成為專業領域的重要趨勢。有鑑於臺灣的觀眾研究正持續進展，但過去多為量化、整合性的研究，缺乏針對不同群體的深度探詢。本研究設定以大學生為研究對象，採取質化深度訪談方式取得資料，試圖整合以認同為基礎的博物館學觀眾研究架構、觀光領域研究獲益基礎管理（BBM）對遊客特質的分析，行銷管理領域對服務品質評估等三個向度的取徑，共同建構出理解大學生博物館經驗的研究方法。依據 Falk（2008）的五種博物館觀眾類型，臺灣大學生觀眾類型分布以「設施利用者」最多，占了43.48%；其次為「經驗找尋者」，34.78%。第三為「探索者」，占17.39%。專業嗜好者占了4.35%。缺乏所謂的心靈朝聖者。第一種「設施利用者」對博物館學習與教育功能的需求強度最低。再以觀光領域獲益基礎管理對遊客研究分類來看，所謂「無心的觀眾」較關切博物館經驗的休閒娛樂面向；其他四類屬於「有心的觀眾」，依其分類類型可以區分出對博物館知識學習不同強度的需求，以此架構來討論不同主體在博物館經驗中的受益感受。最後本研究建議，依據臺灣大學生觀眾現況，將此五種觀眾類型重新調整為三類，分別為「知識探索者」（explorer）、「休閒與社交行動者」（leisure and social actor）與「機能性使用者」（functionalist）三類。

Following the visitor-oriented operational guidelines of New Museology, museum visitor's studies become more and more important trends in academic profession. Nevertheless, here in Taiwan, the museum visitor's studies in these years were emphasizing on integrated research and mostly conducted by quantitative method, focusing mainly on audience in general, instead of on certain sub-groups. Therefore this study adopts the five types of museum audience proposed by Falk (2008), including 'explorers', 'facilitator', 'professional/hobbyists', 'experience seekers' and 'spiritual pilgrims', which are classified basically by visitors' identity with museums. Secondly, this study takes college students as research subject, and collects data through qualitative depth interviews to investigate the museum experience of college students. Moreover, in order to explore how audience evaluate the facilities inside the museums they ever visited, this study also utilizes the framework of benefit-based management (BBM) in tourism, attempting to integrate with the other two disciplines, research structure of museum visitor's studies and marketing management evaluation on quality of service, to analyze college student visitors and their museum experience.As a result, Taiwan college students' audience type distribution is as follow: 'facilitator', the most, accounting for 43.48%; followed by 'experience seeker' for 34.78%. The third is 'explorer', accounting for 17.39%. 'professional/hobbyist' is accounted for 4.35%. But none of the result is the so-called 'spiritual pilgrim'. That is, the most one, the ”facilitator” demands the educational function of museum least. Then in the benefit-based management (BBM) analysis, the so-called ”mindless visitors” concern more about the entertainment experience at the museum; the other four are ”mindful visitors”, their classification type, distinguishing according to different knowledge intensity of learning needs towards the museum, and the same framework to discuss diverse experiences in the museum's main benefit experience. Finally, this study suggests that status of the Taiwan college students as the audience, namely the five audience types should be re-adjusted to three categories, ”knowledge explorer” (explorer), ”leisure and social actor” and ”functionalist”.

1. 王啟祥(2005)。博物館觀眾研究的進路。科技博物，9(4)，33-46。
   連結：
2. 張婉貞(2009)。消費文化、博物館與社會大眾。博物館學季刊，23(2)，5-20。
   連結：
3. 黃俊堯(2003)。訪客群分析：博物館行銷的礎石。博物館學季刊，16(1)，91-103。
   連結：
4. 黃智琪、許義忠(2009)。博物館觀眾研究分析：1992-2006。運動與遊憩研究，3(3)，97-114。
   連結：
5. Annis, Sheldon(1974).Chicago, IL,University of Chicago..
6. Bicknell, S.(ed.),Farmelo, G.(ed.)(1993).Museum Visitor Studies in the 90's.London:Science Museum.
7. Chan, Jennifer Kim Lian(2009).The Consumption of Museum Service Experiences: Benefits and Value of Museum Experiences.Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management,18(2/3),173-196.
8. Corner, John,Harvey, Sylvia(1991).Enterprise and Heritage: Cross Currents of National Culture.London:Routledge..
9. Durham, Meenakshi Gigi(ed.),Kellner, Douglas M.(ed.)(2001).Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks.Oxford, England:Blackwell Publishers..
10. Falk, H. John(2008).Viewing Art Museum Visitors Through the Lens of Identity.Visual Arts Research,34(2),25-34.
11. Falk, H. John,Dierking, Lynn D.(1992).The Museum Experience.Washington, DC:Whalesback Books..
12. Goulding, Christina(2000).The Museum Environment and the Visitor Experience.European Journal of Marketing,34(3/4),261-278.
13. Graburn, Nelson H.(1977).The Museum and the Visitor Experience.The Visitor and the Museum,Berkeley:
14. Gramsci, Antonio(1971).Selections from the Prison Notebooks.New York:International Publishers..
15. Harrison, Julia(1994).Ideas of museums in the 1990's.Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship,13(2),160-176.
16. Hopper-Greenhill, Eilean,Moussouri, Theano(2002).Researching Learning in Museums and Galleries 1990-1999: A Bibliographic Review.Leicester:Research Center for Museums and Galleries.
17. Kaplan, Stephen,Bardwell, Lisa L.,Slakter, Deborah B.(1993).The Restorative Experience as a Museum Benefit.Journal of Museum Education,18(3),15-18.
18. Korn, Randi(1992).Redefining the Visitor Experience.Journal of Museum Education,17(3),17-19.
19. Kotler, Neil,Kotler, Philip(2000).Can Museum Be All Things to All People?: Missions, Goals, and Marketing's Role.Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship,18(3),271-287.
20. Kuhn, Thomas(1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
21. McIntosh, Alison(1999).Into the Tourist's Mind: Understanding the Value of the Heritage Experience.Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing,8(1),41-64.
22. Moscardo, Gianni(1996).Mindful Visitors. Heritage and Tourism.Annals of Tourism Research,23,376-397.
23. Pekarik, Andrew J.,Doering, Zahava D.,Karns, David A.(1999).Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums.Curator,42(2),152-73.
24. Pine, B. Joseph,Gilmore, James H.(1999).The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
25. Rowley, Jennifer(1999).Measuring Total Customer Experience in Museums.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,11(6),303-308.
26. Stylianou-Lambert, Theopisti(2010).Re-conceptualizing Museum Audiences: Power, Activity, Responsibility.Visitor Studies,13(2),130-144.
27. 王啟祥(2000)。博物館教育的演進與研究。科技博物，4(4)，5-19。
28. 伊藤寿朗(1993)。市民のなかの博物館。東京:吉川弘文館。
29. 竹內順一(1985)。第三世代の博物館。冬晴春華論叢，3，73-88。
30. 李斐瑩(2002)。藝術管理：運用觀眾參觀經驗理論提昇博物館服務品質之探討。藝術學報，71，17-32。
31. 郭為藩(2008)。全球視野的文化政策。臺北:心理。
32. 郭義復(2001)。新博物館學的展示研究。博物館學季刊，15(3)，3-11。

1. 陳心方,丁維欣(2020)。擁抱或拒絕？探討令博物館傷腦筋的「自拍」現象。博物館學季刊，34(2)，57-73。
2. 黃惠婷(2015)。如何藉由觀眾滿意度調查提升博物館服務品質─以國立科學工藝博物館為例。科技博物，19(3)，179-224。
3. 林新發,周燦德,朱玉葉(2020)。國立科教類博物館經營策略指標建構之研究。科技博物，24(4)，5-45。
4. 邱于庭(2016)。從「參拜」到「參觀」：以「類博物館」式導覽之觀眾經驗探討宗教類文化資產教育推廣模式。文資學報，10，97-130。
5. 蘇芳儀(2017)。從觀眾參觀經驗探討正經遊戲理論在博物館展示的運用─以「氣候變遷」展示廳為例。科技博物，21(3)，25-53。
6. 鄒宜君,江妍瑩,丁維欣(2019)。以觀展經驗為例初探什麼是有「溫度」的展覽？。科技博物，23(2)，49-70。
7. (2024)。臺灣代表性公立美術館網路行銷策略組合之探討。博物館學季刊，38(1)，77-95。