師資培用策略聯盟可行性指標之研究

A Study on Fesible Indicators of the Teacher Education Strategic Alliance

10.6151/CERQ.2008.1601.02

鄭勝耀(Sheng-Yao Cheng)；蔡清田(Ching-Tien Tsai)

師資培育 ； 策略聯盟 ； 師資培用策略聯盟 ； teacher education ； strategic alliance ； teacher education strategic alliance

當代教育研究季刊

16卷1期（2008 / 03 / 31）

41 - 76

繁體中文

本研究旨在探索因應臺灣人口結構少子化與異質化的趨勢下，師資培育大學、教育行政主管機關，以及學校教學現場三者之間的合作關係，希冀師資培育大學之「培」與學校教學現場之「用」，能在教育行政主管機關的協助下達成均衡的發展。本研究先經由文獻分析、文件分析與焦點座談發展出師資培用聯盟28項因應策略，並據以形成研究調查問卷，問卷內容共分為職前師資養成、教育實習、教師資格檢定與甄選，以及教師專業發展等4大面向，針對師資培育大學、各縣市教育局，以及縣市國高中、小及幼稚園等研究對象進行問卷調查。本研究的主要發現為推動師資培用聯盟時的5項重要策略、2項可行策略與7項較有疑慮的策略。

The purpose of the study is to investigate the possible cooperation among teacher education institutions, schools, and bureaus of education. The researchers attempt to setup a teacher education strategic alliance to balance the issues of demand and supply of teacher education right now in Taiwan. After conducting the literature review, documentary analysis, and focus group discussions, the investigators create 28 strategies for teaher education strategic alliance. Furthermore, the researchers form a set of questionnaires that include preservice teacher education, teaching practicum, qualification and accreditation, and teaching professional development and conduct the survey with bureaus of education, schools, and teacher education institutions. The major findings of the research are five important strategies, two fesible strategies, and seven questionable strategies.

1. Carroll, D. M.(2006).Developing joint accountability in university-school teacher education partnerships.Action in Teacher Education,27(4),3-11.
2. Feiman-Nemser, S.(1998).Teachers as teacher educators.European Journal of Teacher Education,21(1),63-74.
3. Freidheim, C. J.(2000).The trillion-dollar enterprise-How the alliance revolution will transform global business.New York:Perseus Books.
4. Goodlad, J. I.(1994).Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
5. Goodlad, J. I.(1990).Teachers for our nation`s schools.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
6. Harrigan, K.(1988).Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries.Management International Review,28,53-72.
7. Holmes Group(1986).Tomorrow`s teachers: A report of Holmes Group.East Lansing, MI:Holmes Group.
8. Lewis, J. D.(1990).Partnerships for profit: Structuring and managing strategic alliances.New York:Free Press.
9. Lunenberg, M.,Snoek, M.,Swennen, A.(2000).Between pragmatism and legitimacy: Developments and dilemmas in teacher education in the Netherlands.European Journal of Teacher Education,23(3),251-260.
10. National Commission on Teaching and America`s Future (NCTAP)(1996).What matters most: Teaching for America future.New York:National Commission on Teaching and America`s Future.
11. Porter, M.,Fuller, M.(1986).Competition in global industries.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
12. 吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育名詞解釋：人口少子化。教育研究月刊，135，155。
13. 李子建、趙志成(1998)。邁向優質學校教育：香港《躍進學校計劃》的特色。香港:香港中文大學教育研究所。
14. 教育部(2005)。教育施政主軸行動方案（94年修正版）。臺北:教育部。
15. 蔡清田、鄭勝耀(2007)。教育部中等教育司專題研究計畫成果報告(PG9506-0624)教育部中等教育司專題研究計畫成果報告(PG9506-0624),嘉義縣:正大學師資培育中心。

1. 魏曼伊、蔡清田(2010)。芬蘭小學數學教師培育與課程規劃之探究。教育科學期刊，9(1)，125-141。
2. 張訓譯,洪銓璟(2018)。我國大專校院策略聯盟之研究：以「北市大」與「北商大」之策略聯盟為例。育達科大學報，46，89-110。
3. (2009)。全球化下台灣高等教育策略聯盟之因應。教育資料集刊，44，29-49。