一位大學新進教師初任國小教學實習課程的教學困境與壓力

Teaching Challenges for a Novice Faculty of an Educational Practicum Course

10.6151/CERQ.2010.1801.01

張德勝(Te-Sheng Chang)；黃秀雯(Hsiu-Wen Huang)

大學初任教師 ； 高等教育 ； 教學實習 ； 教學困境 ； 教學壓力 ； university novice faculty ； higher education ； educational practicum ； teaching predicament ； teaching stress

當代教育研究季刊

18卷1期（2010 / 03 / 31）

1 - 42

繁體中文

本研究之主要目的在探討一位大學新進教師初任國小教學實習課程所面臨的困境與壓力。研究對象為一位未曾修習過教育相關課程，也沒有小學教學經驗，但卻因配課關係，必須教授國小教學實習課程的大學新進教師。研究資料蒐集包含訪談、教學觀察與文件分析等方法。研究發現，個案教師在帶領教學實習課程遇到的教學困境可歸納為直接與間接兩方面，直接困境部分與教學有直接關係，包含教師個人教學經驗與學生學習態度；而間接困境則包含系所支援、同儕教師，以及社會環境變遷等方面，教學壓力則可分為個人內在與外在環境的因素。根據研究發現，建議大學能建立一套傳習制度，讓新進教師在遇到教學困境與壓力時，能有一位傳習與諮詢的對象，並能與資深教師進行教學經驗交流與對話的正式管道。

This study focused on the teaching challenges and predicaments of a novice assistant professor of an elementary educational practicum course in a university of education. The new assistant professor, who had neither training background in elementary education nor teaching experience in elementary schools, has been assigned to teach elementary educational practicum courses advising student teachers since the fall semester of 2005. Since then, the researchers have followed him as he has been navigating through the terrain of educational practicum courses in the past one and half years. Data collection included interviews with the assistant professor, inquiring his experiences and goals of teaching. We also interviewed students, his teaching partner and colleagues to better understand the context in which the novice faculty teaches. Additionally, we collected course documents, such as the course syllabus, assignments, and his teaching profile. In addition, we observed some of the classroom sessions, and a mid-semester observation stimulated-recall interview was conducted. Results show the novice professor had two major predicaments: internal predicament and external predicament. The internal predicament involves queries from students about his professionalism, increasing difficulties in motivating students to learn, and dealing with student dissatisfaction. The external includes difficulties in cooperating with his teaching partner, as well as lack of supports from senior faculty members. This study addresses the importance of constructing an institutional support mechanism for novice professors to overcome the challenges and predicaments involved in teaching. In doing so, they will be in a better position to interact with students and enhance the quality of teaching.

1. 九年－貫課程與多元文化教育研討會論文集，花蓮:
2. Ausubel, D. P.,Novek, J. D.,Hanesian, H.(1978).A cognitive view.NY:Halt.
3. Banks, J. A.(1994).Multicultural education: Theory and practice.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bateson, M. C.(1994).Peripheral visions.New York:Haper Collins.
5. Bennett, C.(1995).Comprehensive nuilticultural education: Theory and practice.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
6. Carter, B. B.,Patterson, C. J.(1982).Sex roles as social conventions: The development of children's conceptions of sex-role stereotypes.Developmental Psychology,18,812-824.
7. Cornbleth, C.(1988).Curriculum in and out of context.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,3(2),85-96.
8. Gay, G..Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice.New York:Teachers College Press.
9. Hall, E. T.(1976).Beyond culture.New York:Doubleday.
10. Hoffman, D. M..Culture and self in multicultural education: Reflection on discourse, text and practice.American Educational Research Journal,33(3),545-569.
11. Jackson, P. W.,P. W. Jackwson(ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum.New York:Macmillan.
12. Kincheloe, J. L.,Steinberg, S. R.(1997).Changing multiculturalism.Philadelphia:Open University Press.
13. Ladson-Billings,G.(1995).Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy.American Educational Research Journal,32(3),465-492.
14. Ladson-Billings,G.(1994).The dream keepers.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
15. Nieto, S.(1996).Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education.New York:Longman.
16. Ogbu, J..Understanding cultural diversity and learning.Educational Researcher,21(8),5-14.
17. Perry, R. J..Why do multiculturalists ignore anthropologists?.The Chronicle of Higher Education,38(26),52.
18. Posner, G. F.(1992).Analyzing the curriculum.New York:McGraw Hill.
19. Ramsey, P. G.,J. Phinney(Eds.),M. Rotheram(Eds.)(1987).Children s ethnic socialization: Pluralism and development.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
20. Sleeter C. E.(1996).Multicultural education as social activism.New York:SUNY.
21. Sleeter, C. E,Grant, C. A.(1994).Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender.New York:Merrill.
22. Tharp, R. G.(1989).Psychological variables and constants: Effects on teaching and learning in schools.American Psychological,44,359-359.
23. Thomas, D. E.(2000).Culture and schooling: Building bridges between research, praxis, and professionalism.New York:John.
24. Wlodkowski, R. J.,Ginsberg, M. B.(1995).Diversity of motivation: Culturally responsive teaching.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
25. Zumalt, K. K.,M. C.(Ed.),Reynolds(Ed.)(1989).Knowledge base for the beginning teacher.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
26. 行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。行政院教育改革審議委員會。
27. 宋文里譯、J. Bruner著(2001)。教育的文化－文化心理學的觀點。台北:遠流。
28. 宋文里譯、J. Bruner著(2001)。教育的文化－文化心理學的觀點。台北:遠流。
29. 李亦園、歐用生(1992)。我國山胞教育之方向定位與課程內容設計研究。台北:教育部。
30. 李泳吟、單文經(1997)。教學原理。台北:遠流。
31. 林美慧(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立花蓮師範學院多元文化教育研究所。
32. 林麗惠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所。
33. 紀惠英、劉錫麒(2000)。泰雅族兒童的學習世界。花蓮師院學報，10，65-100。
34. 陳枝烈、國立花蓮師範學院主編(2001)。文化差異與兒童學習的關係。
35. 陳麗華、劉美慧(1999)。花蓮縣阿美族兒童的族群認同發展之研究。花蓮師院學報，9，117-226。
36. 黃政傑(1997)。課程設計。台北:東華。
37. 劉錫麒(1987)。花蓮阿美族兒童的學習方式和學業成就。花蓮:直義。
38. 蔡中涵(1996)。漫談原住異文化與漢文化之差異－評論原住民社區文化與原住異教育改革關係之研究，21，42-43。
39. 譚光鼎(1997)。阿美族的教育及其問題之探討。原住民教育季刊，8，1-27。

1. 謝秀芳,紀俊吉(2020)。科大生生命教育課程的實施與檢視－以「生命經驗反思」為主軸的課程規劃。教育科學期刊，19(2)，73-97。