當小孩的滋味：金門縣幼兒的生活敘說

On Being a Child: Personal Narratives of Young Children in Kinmen

10.6151/CERQ.2011.1901.01

蔡敏玲(Min-Ling Tsai)

幼兒敘說 ； 經驗再現 ； 敘說結構 ； children's narratives ； the representation of experiences ； narrative styles

當代教育研究季刊

19卷1期（2011 / 03 / 30）

1 - 53

繁體中文

本文描述金門縣幼兒的生活敘說特色，並試論此種敘說特色形塑的脈絡因素。作者在金門縣棒棒糖班蒐集18位幼兒中班到大班的生活敘說，並訪談幼兒、教師與幼兒家長。以詩節分段方式，整理兩年共257則敘說文本之結構，並剖析敘說文本之場景、內容及角色刻劃。結果顯示，形式特色有二：半數幼兒以「多層次」敘說結構細說生活，三分之二的敘說文本包含觀感／評論。內容特色包括：吃與玩是主要關注，敘說飽含感官知覺的細節，手足角色之建構展露高度的自覺與主張。作者推測，金門和緩的生活步調讓幼兒細緻體驗生活；自在的分享空間與教師的提問是幼兒敘說特色充分展現的脈絡；父母順其自然的教養態度是幼兒刻劃手足角色呈現自覺與主張的重要背景。為理解幼兒與幼兒眼中的生活，傾聽幼兒敘說、覺察幼兒敘說特色是必要而有意義的教育作為。

This paper describes the characteristics of personal narratives of young children from Kinmen, texture of childhood represented in these narratives, and the possible influence of context. Over a two-year period, the author collected the personal narratives of eighteen children in a kindergarten classroom in Kinmen. Stanza analysis was adopted to analyze the narrative structure. As to the contents, the author attended to how settings and characters were depicted in these texts. In regards to the form, a ”multi-layered” narrative structure was typical for half of the children and two-thirds of the narrative texts contained evaluative elements. In terms of content, vivid sensory details were used to describe eating and playing. It can be inferred that a slow pace of life allowed the children to have an enhanced perception of their daily lives. The atmosphere surrounding the sharing time, the attitude of the teacher during the listening, and the nature of the probing questions might all have contributed to the full unfolding of these children's narrative competence. A hands-off parenting style was an important context where the children depicted their siblings with multiple viewpoints. It is therefore proposed that children's narratives can serve as an important avenue in which researchers and teachers can better understand children and how they perceive their daily lives.

1. 蔡敏玲(2009)。假日生活的演出、編織與共構：泰雅幼兒的經驗敘說。教育研究集刊，55(4)，29-64。
   連結：
2. 蔡敏玲、戴芳偉(2008)。畫一個星星給我。教育實踐與研究，21(1)，133-162。
   連結：
3. 賴文鳳(2007)。聆聽邊緣之聲－以「新臺灣之子」的敘說作為實踐幼兒多元文化教育的起點。課程與教學季刊，10(1)，65-82。
   連結：
4. Bruner, J.(1986).Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
5. Cazden, B. C.(1988).Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
6. Chang, C.(2004).Telling stories of experiences: Narrative development of young Chinese children.Applied Psycholinguistics,25,83-104.
7. Chang, C.(2006).Linking early narrative skill to later language and reading ability in Mandarin-speaking children: A longitudinal study.Narrative Inquiry,16(2),275-293.
8. Gee, J. P.(1999).Discourse analysis: Theory and method.New York:Routledge.
9. Geertz, C.(1973).The interpretation of cultures.New York:Basic Books.
10. Labov, W.,Waletzky, J.(1967).Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American ethological society,Seattle, DC:
11. Lai, W.,Lee, Y.,Lee, J.(2010).Visiting doctor's offices: A comparison of Korean and Taiwanese preschool children' narrative development.Early Education And Development,21(3),445-467.
12. McCabe, A.(1996).Chameleon readers: Teaching children to appreciate all kinds of good stories.New York:McGraw-Hill.
13. McCabe, A.(Ed.),Peterson, C.(Ed.)(1991).Developing narrative structure.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. McCabe, A.,Bliss, L. S.(2003).Patterns of narrative discourse: A multicultural, life span approach.New York:Allyn & Bacon.
15. Michaels, S.(1981)."Sharing time": Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy.Language Society,10,423-442.
16. Miller, P. J.,Wiley, A. R.,Fung, H.,Liang, C.(1997).Personal storytelling as a medium of socialization in Chinese and American families.Child Development,68(3),557-568.
17. Minami, M.,McCabe, A.(1991).Haiku as a discourse regulation device: A stanza analysis of Japanese children's personal narratives.Language in Society,20,577-599.
18. Mishler, E. G.(1995).Models of narrative analysis: A typology.Journal of Narrative and Life History,5(2),87-123.
19. Peterson, C.,McCabe, A.(1983).Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative.New York:Plenum Press.
20. Riessman, C. K.(1993).Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
21. Tsai, W.,Chang, C.(2008)."But I first ... and then he kept picking": Narrative skill in Mandarin-speaking children with language impairment.Narrative Inquiry,18(2),349-377.
22. 呂金燮、吳毓瑩、吳麗君、林偉文、柯秋雪、徐式寬(2008)。華人教養之道─若水。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology。
23. 林麗卿(1999)。行政院國家科學會委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學會委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,新竹=Hsinchu, Taiwan=Hsinchu, Taiwan:國立新竹師範學院幼兒教育學系=National Hsinchu Teacher College。
24. 張鑑如、章菁(2002)。幼兒敘述能力之發展：多年期研究。「九十一學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會」論文集，嘉義=Chiayi, Taiwan:
25. 教育部國教司(1987)。幼稚園課程標準。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:正中書局=Cheng Chung。
26. 許明莉(2007)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士班=Department of Human Development and Family Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。
27. 鄒啟蓉、張鑑如、張顯達(2002)。高功能自閉症兒童個人生活經驗敘述研究。特殊教育研究學刊，34(2)，73-99。
28. 蔡敏玲(2005)。幼兒個人經驗敘說之內容、風格與意義初探。國立臺北教育大學學報，18(2)，323-358。
29. 蔡敏玲(2004)。我看教育質性研究創塑意義的問題與難題：經歷、剖析與再脈絡化。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(1)，493-518。

1. 戴芳煒、蔡敏玲(2013)。大班到小學一年級兒童回應圖畫故事書的思考脈絡。教育實踐與研究，26(1)，1-32。
2. 林慧絢(2015)。重看兒童學習：在影像課程中的接合實踐。教育實踐與研究，28(1)，207-240。
3. (2020)。社工師與心理師跨專業合作的成功經驗－以大臺北地區為例。市北教育學刊，67，56-98。