校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢關係之研究

A Study of the Relationships among Principal's Transformational Leadership, Teacher's Acceptance of Organizational Change and School Competitive Advantage

10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.01

鄭彩鳳(Tsai-Feng Cheng)；鄭玉菁(Yu-Ching Cheng)

轉型領導 ； 組織變革接受度 ； 競爭優勢 ； transformational leadership ； acceptance of organizational change ； competitive advantage

當代教育研究季刊

22卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

1 - 46

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在探討校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢關係。本研究採用問卷調查法，以高雄地區國中教育人員為對象，依學校規模分層取樣抽取25所，共590位教師進行調查，共得到有效問卷為557份，問卷可用率96.1%。所得資料以平均數、標準差、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、逐步多元迴歸及結構方程模式，進行統計分析處理。本研究所獲致之結論歸納如下：一、校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢的現況良好。二、校長轉型領導表現愈積極，則教師對組織變革接受度愈高；校長轉型領導愈積極及教師對組織變革接受度愈高，則學校競爭優勢愈高。三、校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度對學校競爭優勢有顯著預測力，以「組織生態變革接受度」最能預測學校競爭優勢。四、校長轉型領導可間接透過教師對組織變革接受度的中介作用，對學校競爭優勢造成正向顯著影響。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships among principal's transformational leadership, teacher's acceptance of organizational change, and school competitive advantage. Questionnaire survey was adopted, and subjects are the faculty of junior high schools of Kaohsiung area. 590 teachers of 25 junior high schools were selected by Stratified Random Sampling according to the school size. 567 questionnaires were responded, and 557 were valid. The response rate was 96.1%. The collected data were analyzed by means of average, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product correlation, stepwise multiple regression and structural equation modeling.The main findings of this research are summed up as follows: 1. The statuses of principal's transformational leadership, teacher's acceptance of organizational change, and school competitive advantage are in good condition. 2. Higher principal's transformational leadership would result in better teacher's acceptance of organizational change. Higher principal's transformational leadership and higher teacher's acceptance of organizational change would result in better school competitive advantage. 3. Principal's transformational leadership and teacher's acceptance of organizational change can apparently predict school competitive advantage, of which the ”acceptance of organizational ecology change” can best predict school competitive advantage. 4. An intermediate effect via teacher's acceptance of organizational change was found between principal's transformational leadership and school competitive advantage.

1. 林俊成(2007)。台灣近二十年來學校組織變革研究論文評析。學校行政，51，116-136。
   連結：
2. 范熾文、張淑芬(2011)。宜蘭縣國民小學校長轉型領導、互易領導與學校競爭優勢關係之研究。學校行政，76，1-23。
   連結：
3. 孫志麟、陳建銘(2007)。學校組織變革中的教師關注：發展階段與類型分析。師大學報，52，159-180。
   連結：
4. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2009)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究：中介效果模式之驗證。當代教育研究，17(3)，83-124。
   連結：
5. 黃乃熒(2007)。國民中學教師所秉持學校組織變革意識型態之調查研究。臺中教育大學學報，21(2)，1-28。
   連結：
6. Chamberlin, E. (1933). The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University
7. 林曉雲、胡清暉（2010）。外籍子女激增小一生8 個就1 個。臺北市：自由時報。[Lin, S.-Y., & Hu, C.-C. (2010). Foreign spouses' children grow in number, almose one-eighth first-grade. Taipei, Taiwan: Liberty Times.]
8. 吳裕益（2009）。結構方程模式的理論與應用（高雄師範大學特殊教育系博士班上課講義）。高雄市：未出版。 [Wu, Y.-Y (2009). Structural equation modeling -- Theory and application. (Class handout). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Unpublished.]。
9. 教育部（2009）。各級學校教師人數。2009 年9 月1 日，取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/index.aspx [Ministry of Education (2009). The number of teachers at all levels of schools. Retrieved September 1, 2009, from http://www.edu.tw/statistics/index.aspx]
10. Aaker, D. A.(1989).Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage.California Management Review,31,91-106.
11. Avolio, B.,Bass, B.(2004).Multifactor leadership questionnaire.Menlo Park, CA:Mind Garden.
12. Bass, B. M.(1985).Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York:Free Press.
13. Bennis, W. G.(2007).The challenges of leadership in the modern world.American Psychologist,62(1),2-5.
14. Burns, J. M.(1978).Leadership.New York:Harper and Row.
15. Campbell, B. A.,Coff, R.,Kryscynski, D.(2012).Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital.Academy of Management Review,37,376-395.
16. Chauvin, S. W.(1992).Baton Rouge, LA,Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisian State University.
17. Darling, J. R.,Heller,V. C.(2009).Organization development in an era of socioeconomic change: A focus on the key to successful management leadership.Organization Development Journal,27(2),9-26.
18. Downton, J. V.(1973).Rebel leadership.New York:Free Press.
19. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research reading.Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.
20. Fitzgerald, S.,Schutte, N.(2010).Increasing transformational leadership through enhancing self-efficacy.Journal of Management Development,29,496-505.
21. Fullan, M. G.(1991).The new meaning of educational change.New York:Teacher College, Columbia University Press.
22. Gouillart, F. J.,Kelly, J. N.(1995).Transforming the organization.New York:McGraw-hill..
23. Guarnieri, R.,Kao, T.(2008).Leadership and CSR-a perfect match: How top companies for leaders utilize CSR as a competive advantage.People and Strategy,31(3),34-41.
24. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.).London, UK:Prentice Hall International.
25. Hendry, L. C.(2010).Product customisation: An empirical study of competitive advantage and repeat business.International Journal of Production Research,48,3845-3865.
26. Hill, C. W.,Jones, G. R.(2001).Strategic management: An integrated approach (5th ed.).Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
27. Kathleen, L.(2012).Pittsburgh, PA,Duquesne University.
28. Leithwood, K. A.(1992).Transformational leadership and school restructuring.Annual Meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement,Victoria, Canada:
29. Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.(2006).Transformational school leadership for largescale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17,201-227.
30. Long, C.,Vicker-Koch, M.(1995).Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage.Organizational Dynamics,24(1),7-22.
31. Moroz, R.,Waugh, R. F.(2000).Teacher receptivity to system-wide educational change.Journal of Educational Administration,38,159-197.
32. Robbins, S. P.(2003).Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications (8th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
33. Selznick, P.(1957).Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation.New York:Row, Perterson and Company.
34. Sergiovanni, T.(2007).Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
35. Shin, J.,Taylor, M. S.,Seo, M.(2012).Resource for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees' attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change.Academy of Management Journal,55,727-748.
36. Silins, H. C.(1994).The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,5,272-298.
37. Wallis, B.(2006).The politics and ideology of intellectual property.Consumer Policy Review,16,117-122.
38. Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in organization (3rd ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice- Hall.
39. 吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
40. 吳清山(2002)。提升學校競爭力的理念與策略。臺灣教育，613，2-10。
41. 吳清山(2005)。學校行政研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育文化=Gao-Deng-Jiao-Yu-Wen-Hua.。
42. 李金娥(2006)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
43. 汪良宏(2008)。花蓮市=Hualien, Taiwan，國立花蓮教育大學國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Compulsory Educaiton, National Hualien University of Education。
44. 林來利(2012)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系=Department of Educational Management, National Taipei University of Education。
45. 徐淑麗(2010)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系=Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education。
46. 郝靜宜(2009)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
47. 張明輝(1998)。學校行政革新專輯。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=Shtabook。
48. 張德銳、張素偵(2012)。臺北市中小學校長轉型領導、教師領導與教學效能之研究。市北教育學刊，41，59-97。
49. 許素梅(2010)。花蓮市=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Compulsory Educaiton, National Dong Hwa University。
50. 黃天助(2011)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系=Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education。
51. 詹幼儀(2004)。嘉義縣=Chiayi, Taiwan，國立中正大學教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Education, National Chung Cheng University。
52. 劉麗蓉(2002)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Compulsory Educaiton, National Taichung University of Education。
53. 鄭燕祥(2003)。教育領導與改革：新典範。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育文化=Gao-Deng-Jiao-Yu-Wen-Hua。
54. 濮世緯(2003)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學教育研究所=Department of Education, National Chengchi University。
55. 謝文全(2012)。教育行政學（四版）。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育文化=Gao-Deng-Jiao-Yu-Wen-Hua。
56. 鍾炳雄(2008)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=Department of Eduation, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
57. 顏秀如、張明輝(2008)。學校競爭優勢的理念與策略。教育研究月刊，167，81-92。

1. 潘慧玲,陳文彥(2019)。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響：檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，119-147。
2. 潘慧玲,許筠萱(2019)。分散性領導在推動學習共同體中的實踐：以一所國中國文教師學習社群為案例。學校行政，119，197-214。
3. 謝幸吟、郭俊麟、張正平(2017)。教師專業學習社群知識分享、創意教學與社群召集人轉型領導關係之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(2)，139-166。
4. 謝月香、張文權、范熾文(2016)。當代學校經營與管理新興議題取向之探究。學校行政，102，1-18。
5. (2016)。高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用。教育與心理研究，39(4)，29-59。
6. (2016)。優質化高中校長知識領導、教師專業發展與學校教育績效關係之研究。教育學刊，47，1-39。
7. (2020)。創造學校競爭優勢策略之探究：學習領導的觀點。教育研究月刊，317，4-18。