國小人員情緒地理的研究：以校長為焦點

A Study on Staffs' Emotional Geographies in an Elementary School: Focusing on the Principal

10.6151/CERQ.2014.2204.02

林明地(Ming-Dih Lin)；梁金都(Chin-Tu Liang)

校長 ； 國小 ； 情緒地理 ； 情緒距離 ； principal ； elementary school ； emotional geographies ； emotional distances

當代教育研究季刊

22卷4期（2014 / 12 / 01）

55 - 103

繁體中文

本研究主要從情緒地理的觀點，透過參與觀察和訪談的方式，蒐集「旭日國小」成員在六項關鍵事件中互動過程的資料，以分析校長和成員之間的情緒距離形式和關係，並獲致了以下重要的結論。1.校長和成員主要呈現道德、個人、政治、專業等的距離形式和關係，較少出現社會文化和物理距離的形式和關係。2.校長和成員在教學事務上易於發展道德和專業距離的關係，而在行政運作上則是個人和道德與政治距離的關係。3.校長和主任大致有接近的道德距離關係，惟與教師則有比較接近的專業和個人距離關係。4.誰的責任、建立處理原則、堅持自己立場、以對話發展共識等是構成校長和成員道德距離的主要內涵。5.關心成員需求、忽視工作負荷、採取親切的作為、幽默的人格特質等是校長和成員之間個人距離的影響因素。6.彈性調整的作為、審慎的權力運作、尊重教師實務的態度等是拉近校長和成員政治距離的處理原則。7.重視教師的專業自主性、校長的支援和成員的參與、提供對話的空間等方法，有助於縮短校長和成員之間的專業距離。8.校長和成員各種情緒距離的關係，約略有著相互影響的特質。

Using the perspective of emotional geographies, this study explored the emotional distances and their relations between the principal and the staffs in ＂the Rising Sun Elementary School＂. The participatory observations and interviews were adopted in this study. The researchers analyzed the interactive process among 12 members of the school on six critical events and focused on the principal as a center in the school. The main findings were as follows: First, the major categories and their relations among the principal and school members were moral distances, personal distances, political distances, and professional distances, and the least shown relations were sociocultural and physical distances. Second, between the principal and the staffs, the relations of moral and professional distances were developed easily on the teaching affairs. The administrative matters were easy to help creating the personal, moral, and political distances. Third, the close moral distances were shown between the principal and division directors; on the contrary, the principal and the teachers appeared to have relatively close professional and personal distances. Forth, the main connotations of moral distance included the questions of distributive responsibility, building up the operative principles, keeping on the one's own stance, and developing mutual consensus through constant dialogues. Fifth, the influential factors of personal distance were taking care of members' needs, ignoring the workload, adopting the friendly actions, and demonstrating a sense of humor. Sixth, flexible actions, careful power exercises, and respective teaching practice and attitude constituted the operative principles of political distance. Seventh, valuing teachers' professional autonomy, the principal's assistances and members' participation, supplying a dialogue room could shorten the professional distances among the principal and school members. Finally, the relations of the various emotional distances among the principal and school members in this school were shown a slightly interdependent nature.

1. Abbott, P.,Wallace, C.(1997).An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives.New York:Routledge.
2. Anderson, K.,Smith, S. J.(2001).Editorial: Emotional geographies..Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,26(1),7-10.
3. Blase, J.,Anderson, G. L.(1995).The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment.New York:Teachers College Press.
4. Chen, H. J.,Wang, Y. H.(2011).Emotional geographies of teacher-parent relations: Three teachers' perceptions in Taiwan.Asia Pacific Education Review,12,185-195.
5. Dezin, N.(1984).Experience and education.New York:Macmillan.
6. Ferguson, K. E.(1984).The feminist case against bureaucracy.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University.
7. Firestone, W. A.(ed.),Riehl, C.(ed.)(2005).A new agenda for research in educational leadership.New York:Teachers College.
8. Gaan, N.(2012).Impact of emotional labour on teaching effectiveness: A study of higher education in India.Indian Journal of Industrial Relations,47,673-684.
9. Griffith, A.,Smith, D.(1986).Constructing cultural knowledge: Mothering as discourse.Women and education: A Canadian perspective,Calgary, Canada:
10. Hargreaves, A.(2001).The emotional geographies of teachers' relations with colleagues.International Journal of Educational Research,35,503-527.
11. Hargreaves, A.(1998).The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development: With implications for educational leadership.International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice,1,315-336.
12. Hargreaves, A.(2001).Emotional geographies of teaching.Teachers College Record,103,1056-1080.
13. Hargreaves, D. H.(1994).The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development.Teaching and Teacher Education,10,423-438.
14. Harvey, S. T.,Bimler, D.,Evans, I. M.,Kirkland, J.,Pechtel, P.(2012).Mapping the classroom emotional environment.Teaching and Teacher Education,28,628-640.
15. Hochshild, A. R.(1983).The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
16. Kelchtermans, G.,Piot, L.,Ballet, K.(2011).The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals' work lives..Oxford Review of Education,37(1),93-108.
17. Lasky, S.(2000).The cultural and emotional politics of teacher-parent interactions.Teaching and Teacher Education,16,843-860.
18. Lewis, M.(ed.),Haviland, J.(ed.)(1993).Handbook of emotions.New York:The Guilford.
19. Lewis, M.(ed.),Haviland-Jones, J. M.(ed.)(1993).Handbook of emotions.New York:The Guilford.
20. Litmanen, T.,Lonka, K.,Inkinen, M.,Lipponen, L.,Hakkarainen, K.(2012).Capturing teacher students' emotional experiences in context: Does inquiry-based learning make a difference?.Instructional Science,40,1083-1101.
21. Little, J. W.(1990).The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations.Teachers College Record,91,509-536.
22. McCaughtry, N.,Martin, J. J.,Kulinna, P. H.,Cothran, D.(2006).The emotional dimensions of urban teacher change.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,25(1),99-119.
23. Militello, M.,Raillis, S. F.,Goldring, E.(2009).Leading with inquiry and action: How principals improve teaching and learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
24. Nguwi, Y. Y.,Cho, S. Y.(2010).Support-vector-based emergent selforganising approach for emotional understanding.Connection Science,22,355-371.
25. Pile, S.(2010).Emotions and affect in recent human geography.Royal Geographical Society,35(1),5-20.
26. Priestley, M.,Miller, K.,Barett, L.,Caroyn, W.(2011).Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: The Highland experience.British Educational Research Journal,37,265-284.
27. Rusch, E. A.(2005).Institutional barriers to organizational learning in school systems: The power of silence.Educational Administration Quarterly,41(1),83-120.
28. Sharp, J.(2009).Geography and gender: What belong to feminist geography? Emotion, power and change.Progress in Human Geography,33(1),74-80.
29. Starkey, C.(2008).Emotion and full understanding.Ethic Theory and Moral Practice,11,425-454.
30. Winograd, K.(2003).The functions of teacher emotions: The good, the bad, and the ugly.Teachers College Record,105,1641-1673.
31. Wood, N.,Smith, S. J.(2004).Instrumental routes to emotional geographies.Social and Cultural Geography,5,533-548.
32. Woods, P.(1996).Researching the art of teaching: Ethnography for educational use.London, UK:Routledge.
33. Yin, R. K.(2002).Case study research: Design and methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

1. 陳幸仁,胡協豐(2022)。國小校長與家長會互動之情緒距離探究。嘉大教育研究學刊，48，1-29。
2. 郭倢慇(2021)。學校教師系統與行政系統互動之情緒地理探究－以推動資訊科技融入教學創新之歷程為例。弘光學報，88，1-22。
3. 洪浩宸(2021)。公立國中總務主任與工友互動之情緒距離探究。嶺東學報，48，377-400。
4. 翁芳怡(2019)。一名國中女主任與女校長互動之情緒地理探究。育達科大學報，47，49-74。
5. (2018)。國小校長營造社區關係之研究：情緒距離觀點。教育政策論壇，21(1)，59-91。
6. (2024)。教育行政研究方法偏態化趨勢的思與覺－理論視角、價值論述與研究取徑。教育實踐與研究，37(2)，119-144。