國民中小學校長永續領導指標及權重體系之建構

THE INDICATORS AND WEIGHT SYSTEM OF SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP FOR PRINCIPALS IN ELEMENTARY AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

10.6151/CERQ.2016.2401.01

黃建翔(Chien-Hsiang Huang)；吳清山(Ching-Shan Wu)

校長 ； 永續領導 ； 模糊德懷術 ； 層次分析法 ； principal ； sustainable leadership ； Fuzzy Delphi Method ； Analytic Hierarchy Process

當代教育研究季刊

24卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

本研究旨在建構國民中小學校長永續領導指標，並確立國民中小學校長永續領導指標之權重體系。研究方法採取模糊德懷術與層次分析法進行探究。在指標發展上，首先透過分析國內外校長永續領導之相關研究，初步建構「國民中小學校長永續領導指標建構調查問卷」，再邀請20位教育專家學者與教育現場實務人員組成模糊德懷術與層次分析小組，以蒐集專家對於國民中小學校長永續領導指標之相關意見，進行指標的選取與賦予權重，據以建置完成「國民中小學校長永續領導指標」，其內涵架構包含五大層面－道德與永續取向、權責分享與合作、主動與專業學習、創新發展與傳承、資源運用與維護，共涵蓋十個項目、五十項指標細目。

This study is to construct the Sustainable Leadership Indicators of principals in elementary and junior high schools, and thereby to confirm the weight system of these indicators. Fuzzy Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process were adopted as the main research methods. Initially, a framework of the questionnaire had been developed for the Sustainable Leadership Indicators of principals in elementary and junior high schools via global research analyses in Sustainable Leadership of principals. And then, the Fuzzy Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process Team, composed of twenty scholars in education fields and principals, was invited to offer opinions on these indicators of principals in elementary and junior high schools, as well as the selection and weighting, and accordingly construct the Sustainable Leadership Indicators of principals in elementary and junior high schools. The sustainable leadership indicators consist of five dimensions, orientation toward moral and sustainability, sharing and cooperation in duty, active and professional learning, innovation development and inheritance, and the utilization and maintenance of resources, which cover ten units and fifty elements.

1. 吳清山、王令宜、黃建翔(2014)。國民小學推動永續發展教育之調查研究。課程與教學季刊，17(2)，93-118。
   連結：
2. 許惠茹(2008)。校長領導學校本位課程永續發展經驗之研究。當代教育研究，16(4)，71-108。
   連結：
3. Bossidy, L.,Charan, R.(2002).Execution: The discipline of getting things done.New York, NY:Crown.
4. Bourdieu, P.(1990).The logic of practice.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
5. Cormican, K.,O'Sullivan, D.(2003).A collaborative knowledge management tool for product innovation management.International Journal Technology Management,26(1),53-68.
6. Davies, B.(Ed.)(2007).Developing sustainable leadership.London, UK:Paul Chapman.
7. Day, C.(2005).Sustaining schools in challenging contexts: Leadership in English school.Journal of Educational Administration,43(6),573-583.
8. Fullan, M.(2002).Leadership and sustainability.Principal Leadership,3(4),14-17.
9. Fullan, M.(2005).Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
10. Fullan, M.,Hill, P.,Crevola, C.(2006).Breakthrough.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
11. Hargreaves, A.,Fink, D.(2006).Sustaining leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
12. Hargreaves, A.,Fink, D.(2003).Sustaining leadership.Phi Delta Kappan,84(9),693-700.
13. Hargreaves, A.,Fink, D.(2004).The seven principles of sustainable leadership.Education Leadership,61(7),8-13.
14. Kevin, S. G.,Michael, A. L.(2011).Responsible leadership outcomes via stakeholder CSR values: Testing a values-centered model of transformational leadership.Journal of Business Ethics,98(1),37-55.
15. Kuenkel, P.(2008).Mind and heart: Mapping your personal journey towards leadership for sustainability.Berlin, Germany:The Collective Leadership Institute.
16. Mulford, B.(2005).The international context for research in educational leadership.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,33(2),139-154.
17. Pella, S.(2011).A situative perspective on developing writing pedagogy in a teacher professional learning community.Teacher Education Quarterly,38(1),107-125.
18. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
19. Saaty, T. L.(2008).Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.Int. J. Services Sciences,1(1),83-98.
20. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2012).Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development, Abridged.Paris, France:Author.
21. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2009).Learning for a sustainable world: Review of contexts and structures for ESD.Paris, France:Author.
22. Venkataraman, B.(2009).Education for sustainable development.Environment,51(2),8-10.
23. Wenger, E.(1999).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
24. 江志正(2008)。教育變革時代中談永續領導。教育研究月刊，171，58-67。
25. 吳清山、林天祐(2010)。教育e 辭書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
26. 高慧容(2008)。建構國民小學校長永續領導能力指標協助校長角色定位。2008 中小學校長專業發展學術研討會，Taichung, Taiwan:
27. 張子超(2004)。永續教育的意涵。教師天地，132，4-11。
28. 張明輝(2005)。永續領導與學校經營。臺灣教育，635，8-12。
29. 黃旭鈞(2012)。永續領導促進教育幸福的理念與策略。教育研究月刊，220，55-67。
30. 黃旭鈞(2008)。永續領導的理念與實踐。2008 教育品質與教育評鑑學術研討會，Taipei, Taiwan:
31. 楊冠政(2001)。邁向21 世紀永續發展的環境倫理。中等教育，52(2)，4-19。
32. 葉連祺(2009)。教育行政：永續領導。教育研究月刊，186，140-142。
33. 謝傳崇(2014)。「國民小學校長永續卓越領導量表」之建構與衡量。教育研究月刊，248，73-91。

1. 陳玉娟,許添明,商雅雯,余穎麒(2020)。大學系所主管圖像、挑戰與培訓－以一所國立大學為例。教育實踐與研究，33(1)，1-31。
2. 蘇景進、謝麗君、宋修德(2018)。高職教師知覺校長溝通行為與高職優質化執行成效之研究。技術與職業教育學報，8(2)，25-67。
3. (2019)。高中職校長翻轉領導指標權重體系之建構。教育與心理研究，42(3)，1-26。