题名

大學校園智慧零售實作場域之人才培育個案研究

并列篇名

A CASE STUDY OF INTELLIGENT RETAIL TALENT CULTIVATION IN A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SETTING

DOI

10.6151/CERQ.201903_27(1).0001

作者

張秀華(Hsiu-Hua Chang)；黃仲楷(Chung-Kai Huang)；林純如(Chun-Ju Lin)

关键词

智慧零售 ； 人才培育 ； 關鍵能力 ； ADDIE ； 學習評估 ； Kirkpatrick ； Intelligent Retail ； Talent Cultivation ； Key Capabilities ； ADDIE ； Learning Assessment ； Kirkpatrick

期刊名称

當代教育研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

27卷1期（2019 / 03 / 31）

页次

1 - 37

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

研究目的：本研究評估一所大學校園智慧零售人才培育課程與實作場域的教學設計成效，以及對智慧零售未來的實作型教學規劃提出可修正方向與建議。研究設計／方法／取徑：依據ADDIE教學系統，建置大學校園智慧零售課程與實作場域，依Kirkpatrick階層一與階層二評估學習成效，以先量後質的連續混合型研究方法，對參與計畫全體18位學生與3位老師進行問卷調查，並以計畫學習成績高中低分群抽樣6位學生，做深度訪談，訪談內容主要包含了學習面向、課程面向與科技面向等三個面向。研究發現或結論：在認知方面，學生認同課程有助於增強新零售時代智慧化發展趨勢的掌握、了解智慧零售內涵，以及課程有助於成為智慧零售產業關鍵人才。在技能方面，學生認同課程訓練有助於運用知識與技能且保持笑容接待賓客。在情意方面，學生、同儕與教師皆認同參與計畫後，學生贊同學校跨領域與做中學計劃。學生自評參與計畫後能累積人際溝通經驗與團隊合作完成工作；學生認同同儕全力投入計畫；教師認同學生參與計畫後，大幅提升了操作智慧零售系統的信心與熟悉度，且改變對智慧科技的興趣。因此，教學成效問卷的研究結果顯示，學生認同本計畫可培育「零售科技創新管理人才」與「服務模式設計人才」，並且有信心能成為「服務模式設計人才」與「零售科技創新管理人才」，符合未來企業發掘消費者需求與營運管理等關鍵能力的期待。建議智慧零售未來的實作型教學規劃，智慧設備與系統整合應優先建置，搭配足以模擬實際零售情境的交易量，才能在實作中體驗，透過智慧設備與消費者的互動與數據回饋，據以設計能為消費者提供價值的服務模式。研究原創性／價值：本研究價值在於大學校園智慧零售實作場域的建置，以及跨領域與做中學教學計畫的導入，教學設計的成效回饋分析是正向的，鼓勵大學校園導入商業實作環境。教育政策建議／實務意涵：建議政府鼓勵技職校院建置「智慧零售校園實作場域」，並導入產業界與法人資源在場域規劃建置與協同教學方面充份合作，以真實反應智慧零售的最新發展趨勢。
英文摘要

Purpose: This article aims at studying the current Administrative Due Process on the deliberation of the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education. In the meanwhile, the requirements of the legitimate administrative process and the disputes over the legal nature of the curriculum guidelines are clarified for establishing a cornerstone of achieving the goal of Constitutional protection for the fundamental education right. Design/methodology/approach: The ADDIE and Kirkpatrick models (Levels 1 and 2) were used as guidelines for building effective training and evaluating performance. A sequential mixed method was used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Questionnaires and in-depth interviews were designed to assess the reflections and learning performance from the 18 students and 3 faculty members. Given the responses from the questionnaires, we summarized learning, course and technology facets of the research for the follow-up in-depth interviews. By identifying and analyzing the important emerging topics through the interviews in the aspects of curriculum learning and technology, we validated the design of the questionnaires as well. Findings: In terms of cognition, the students acknowledged that the course helped to master the trend of retail intelligence in the new retail era, to understand the connotation of smart retail, and to foster a key talent in the smart retail industry. In terms of skills, the students agreed that the training helped to apply the knowledge and skills while they kept a smile to usher guests. In terms of affection, the students, peers and teachers agreed that after participating in the project, students agree with the school's cross-disciplinary and learning-by-doing programs. The findings suggest that the participating students perceived that the mastery of intelligent retail trends is beneficial for their interpersonal communication and collaborative teamwork skills. In addition, the faculty members agreed that students' understanding the meanings and implications of intelligent retail and attending the course's training help to develop their confidence in and familiarity with operating an intelligent retail system. Furthermore, the faculty members found that the students' skills have improved considerably and their interests in learning intelligent technology have enhanced as well. Additionally, the students indicated that their potentials have increased in becoming innovation management talents and talents for the design of service models. They also considered that this program nurtured their innovative management skills in retail technology and thinking for the design of service models. Additionally, the students considered that this program nurtured their innovative management skills in retail technology and thinking for the design of service models. They also indicated that their potentials have increased in becoming talents for the design of service models and innovation management talents. It is suggested that the intelligence equipment and system should be constructed in advance, coupled with simulations of retail scenarios and transactions for the future practice and teaching plan. Meanwhile, the incorporation of consumers' interactions and numerical feedbacks needs to be considered in order to design a valuable service model for consumers. Originality/Value: The performance evaluation of an experimental smart store in university is a practical area. Overall, the ＂Cross-disciplinary Intelligent Retail＂ and ＂Learning-by-doing＂ projects are both perceived to be positive. Therefore, we encourage the introduction of this type of practice-based learning environment in higher education. Education Policy/Practice Meanings: It is suggested that the Taiwanese government can encourage vocational universities and colleges to implement intelligent retail shops in campus settings and bring in resources from the industries and legal foundations to collaboratively construct and design the teaching. This interdisciplinary collaboration will reflect the latest development trends in intelligent retail.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. (2016).Ethical ripples of creativity and innovation.Hampshire, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Agarwal, N.,Pande, N.,Ahuja, V.(2014).Expanding the Kirkpatrick evaluation model-towards more effcient training in the IT sector.International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP),5(4),19-34.
  3. Akter, S.,Wamba, S. F.(2016).Big data analytics in E-commerce: A systematic review and agenda for future research.Electronic Markets,26(2),173-194.
  4. Alliger, G. M.,Janak, E. A.(1989).Kirkpatrick's levels of training criteria: Thirty years later.Personnel Psychology,42(2),331-342.
  5. Brown, A. H.,Green, T. D.(2016).The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice.New York, NY:Routledge.
  6. Brown, G. A.,Bull, J.,Pendlebury, M.(2013).Assessing student learning in higher education.New York, NY:Routledge.
  7. Bughin, J.,Chui, M.,Manyika, J.(2010).Clouds, big data, and smart assets: Ten tech-enabled business trends to watch.McKinsey Quarterly,56(1),75-86.
  8. Chaffey, D.,Smith, P. R.(2013).Emarketing excellence: Planning and optimizing your digital marketing.New York, NY:Routledge.
  9. Chyung, S. Y.,Stepich, D.,Cox, D.(2006).Building a competency-based curriculum architecture to educate 21st-century business practitioners.Journal of Education for Business,81(6),307-314.
  10. Collins, M.(1983).A critical analysis of competency-based systems in adult education.Adult Education Quarterly,33(3),174-183.
  11. Diamantidis, A. D.,Chatzoglou, P. D.(2014).Employee post training behaviour and performance: Evaluating the results of the training process.International Journal of Training and Development,18(3),149-170.
  12. Dubois, D.,Rothwell, W.(2004).Competency-based human resource management: Discover a new system for unleashing the productive power of exemplary performers.Mountain View, CA:Davies-Black Publishing.
  13. Erevelles, S.,Fukawa, N.,Swayne, L.(2016).Big data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing.Journal of Business Research,69(2),897-904.
  14. Friess, P.,Riemenschneider, R.(2016).IoT ecosystems implementing smart technologies to drive innovation for future growth and development.Digitising the industry—Internet of things connecting the physical, digital and virtual worlds,Gistrup, Netherlands:
  15. Gagne, R. M.,Wager, W. W.,Golas, K. C.,Keller, J. M.,Russell, J. D.(2005).Principles of instructional design.Performance Improvement,44(2),44-46.
  16. Gangani, N.,McLean, G. N.,Braden, R. A.(2006).A competency based human resource development strategy.Performance Improvement Quarterly,19(1),127-139.
  17. Goldring, D.(2017).Pathways for 21st century learners: Integrating industry-based certifcations into the marketing curriculum.Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice,17(1),33-38.
  18. Grohmann, A.,Kauffeld, S.(2013).Evaluating training programs: Development and correlates of the questionnaire for professional training evaluation.International Journal of Training and Development,17(2),135-155.
  19. Gustafson, K. L.,Branch, R. M.(2002).What is instructional design.Trends and issues in instructional design and technology,Boston, MA:
  20. Hardy, G.,Everett, D.(2014).Shaping the future of business education: Relevance, rigor, and life preparation.Journal of Education for Business,89(5),274-276.
  21. Hazen, B. T.,Boone, C. A.,Ezell, J. D.,Jones-Farmer, L. A.(2014).Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications.International Journal of Production Economics,154,72-80.
  22. Ho, A. D.,Arendt, S. W.,Zheng, T.,Hanisch, K. A.(2016).Exploration of hotel managers’ training evaluation practices and perceptions utilizing Kirkpatrick's and Phillips's models.Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism,15(2),184-208.
  23. Hodge, S.(2007).The origins of competency-based training.Australian Journal of Adult Learning,47(2),179-209.
  24. Hofacker, C. F.,Malthouse, E. C.,Sultan, F.(2016).Big data and consumer behavior: Imminent opportunities.Journal of Consumer Marketing,33(2),89-97.
  25. Huang, C.-K.,Lin, C.-Y.(2017).Flipping business education: Transformative use of team-Based learning in human resource management classrooms.Journal of Educational Technology & Society,20(1),323-336.
  26. Jara, A. J.,Parra, M. C.,Skarmeta, A. F.(2012).Marketing 4.0: A new value added to the marketing through the internet of things.Sixth international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing
  27. Kaufman, R.,Keller, J. M.(1994).Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick.Human Resource Development Quarterly,5(4),371-380.
  28. Kirkpatrick, D.,Kirkpatrick, J.(2006).Evaluating training programs: The four levels.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  29. Kotler, P.,Kartajaya, H.,Setiawan, I.(2016).Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
  30. Lozano, J. F.,Boni, A.,Peris, J.,Hueso, A.(2012).Competencies in higher education: A critical analysis from the capabilities approach.Journal of Philosophy of Education,46(1),132-147.
  31. Lurie, S. J.(2012).History and practice of competency based assessment.Medical Education,46(1),49-57.
  32. Mata, F. J.,Quesada, A.(2014).Web 2.0, social networks and e-commerce as marketing tools.Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research,9(1),56-69.
  33. Middleton, K. W.,Donnellon, A.(2014).Personalizing entrepreneurial learning: A pedagogy for facilitating the know why.Entrepreneurship Research Journal,4(2),167-204.
  34. 教育部=Ministry of Education
  35. Moldovan, L.(2016).Training outcome evaluation model.Procedia Technology,22,1184-1190.
  36. Molenda, M.(2003).In search of the elusive ADDIE model.Performance Improvement,42(5),34-37.
  37. Morris, M. H.,Kuratko, D. F.(2014).Building university 21st century entrepreneurship programs that empower and transform.Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation & economic growth
  38. Pantano, E.(2014).Innovation drivers in retail industry.International Journal of Information Management,34(3),344-350.
  39. Peterson, C.(2003).Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,12(3),227-241.
  40. Porter, M. E.,Heppelmann, J. E.(2014).How smart, connected products are transforming competition.Harvard Business Review,92(11),64-88.
  41. Priporas, C. V.,Stylos, N.,Fotiadis, A. K.(2017).Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda.Computers in Human Behavior,77,374-381.
  42. Razzaque, M. A.,Milojevic-Jevric, M.,Palade, A.,Clarke, S.(2015).Middleware for internet of things: A survey.IEEE Internet of Things Journal,3(1),70-95.
  43. Salas, E.,Tannenbaum, S. I.,Kraiger, K.,Smith-Jentsch, K. A.(2012).The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice.Psychological Science in the Public Interest,13(2),74-101.
  44. Shariatzadeh, N.,Lundholm, T.,Lindberg, L.,Sivard, G.(2016).Integration of digital factory with smart factory based on Internet of Things.Procedia CIRP,50,512-517.
  45. Singh, V. L.,Manrai, A. K.,Manrai, L. A.(2015).Sales training: A state of the art and contemporary review.Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science,20(38),54-71.
  46. Spiess, J.,T’Joens, Y,Dragnea, R.,Spencer, P.,Philippart, L.(2014).Using big data to improve customer experience and business performance.Bell Labs Technical Journal,18(4),3-17.
  47. Spiller, L.,Tuten, T.(2015).Integrating metrics across the marketing curriculum.Journal of Marketing Education,37(2),114-126.
  48. Struyven, K.,Dochy, F.,Janssens, S.,Gielen, S.(2006).On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment.Learning and Instruction,16,279-294.
  49. Tan, K.,Newman, E.(2013).The evaluation of sales force training in retail organizations: A test of Kirkpatrick's four-level model.International Journal of Management,30(2),692-703.
  50. Tashakkori, A.(Ed.),Teddlie, C.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  51. Trigwell, K.,Ashwin, P.(2006).An exploratory study of situated conceptions of learning and learning environments.Higher Education,51,243-258.
  52. Uskov, V. L.,Bakken, J. P.,Pandey, A.(2015).The ontology of next generation smart classrooms.Smart education and smart e-learning,Cham, Switzerland:
  53. Wang, S.,Noe, R. A.,Wang, Z.-M.(2014).Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems: A quasi–field experiment.Journal of Management,40(4),978-1009.
  54. 于健, C.,許金枝, C.-C.(2014)。教學環境對國小學生休閒教育學習成效之影響─以「民眾生活休閒活動課程」為例。觀光與休閒管理期刊，2(2)，94-117。
  55. 范瑞東, J.-T.(2005)。資訊科技融入教學教師實施之困境與可行策略之文獻評析。中華人文社會學報，3，132-155。
  56. 財團法人資訊工業策進會（編輯）=Institute for Information Industry. (Ed.)(2010).2010 數位學習產業白皮書.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:經濟部工業局=Institute for Information Industry, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  57. 陳芳哲, F.-J.,簡志成, Z.-C.(2009)。資訊教育發展。資訊社會研究，17，53-126。
被引用次数
  1. 沈永祺(2022)。應用設計導向學習於新產品管理課程以提升學生關鍵能力。科技管理學刊，27(3)，75-111。
print cancel