《教師專業素養指引與師資職前教育課程基準》實施之影響、挑戰與因應：中等師資培育機構之觀點

THE INFLUENCE, CHALLENGES AND COPING STRATEGIES OF THE ＂STANDARD FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM＂ FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003

湯家偉(Chia-Wei Tang)；王俐淳(Li-Chun Wang)

中等學校師資培育 ； 教師專業素養 ； 課程基準 ； 因應策略 ； secondary school teacher education ； teacher professional standards ； curriculum baseline ； coping strategies

當代教育研究季刊

29卷2期（2021 / 06 / 30）

61 - 94

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究旨在探討《中華民國教師專業素養指引—師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準》實施後，師培機構在師資職前課程是否做出相對應的改變及變革過程中所面臨的挑戰、問題與因應策略。研究設計／方法／取徑：本研究採立意取樣方式，依學校所在區域、學校類型就40所中等師資培育機構抽取一半，並以其機構主管及課程承辦人員為對象，合計40位，進行半結構式訪談。研究發現或結論：1.師培機構的課程改革投入程度有落差，而主管的領導、教師的投入、學生的引導以及甄選的配套是課程變革落實與否的關鍵。2.師培機構對《教師專業素養暨課程基準》中的「各專業課程類別最低學分數的增減」特別是實踐課程的學分數規定以及「實地服務時數取消」較有異議。3.師培機構在實施《教師專業素養暨課程基準》的過程中面臨「行政端」、「教師端」、「學生端」的困境與挑戰，部分機構亦發展出因應策略。4.師培機構面臨之困境體現於行政、教師與學生三個部分，且部分存在機構屬性之差異。研究原創性／價值：1.目前相關研究仍多為單一學校為個案進行個案經驗分享或學者意見評論，雖有一篇實證研究，但缺乏以師資培育機構觀點之實證文獻。2.本研究以20所中等師資培育機構之觀點，探討各師培機構的實施作法、問題以及因應策略，有助於檢討此次變革的實施現況，並彙整相關因應策略與建議供師培機構端或是主管機關政策修正之參考。

Purpose: This study examines whether teacher education institutions have made curriculum changes conforming to Taiwan (R.O.C.)'s policy document ＂Guidance for R.O.C. teacher professional competence- Standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum＂. This study also investigates the challenges, and coping strategies experienced by institutions in the process of implementing the policy. Design/methodology/approach: Through a purposive sampling, we selected 20 secondary school teacher education institutions (out of the 40 institutions in Taiwan) based on the regions and the characteristics of the institutions. Accordingly, 20 directors and 20 administrative staff from these institutions were interviewed in a semi-structured manner. Findings/results: 1. There were varying levels of commitment to the curriculum reform in the teacher education institutions. The keys to the full implementation of the curriculum change were the leadership of supervisors, the commitment of teachers, the guidance for students, and the supplementary measures for screening and selection. 2. The teacher education institutions generally disagreed an element of the policy, that of an ＂increase or decrease of the minimum number of credits for each professional course category＂, most notably the requirement of the number of credits for practical courses and the elimination of field service hours. 3. In the process of implementing the policy, teacher education institutions experienced challenges and difficulties at administration, teacher, and student levels. We observed that some institutions developed their own coping strategies. 4. These challenges at administration, teacher, and student levels forced challenges for each institution that varied depending on their characteristics. Originality/value: 1. Previous studies investigated single-school cases in terms of experience sharing and scholarly critique. Although there is one empirical study, there is still a lack of empirical literature from the perspective of teacher education institutions. 2. This study examines the implementation methods, problems, and coping strategies from the perspectives of 20 secondary school teacher education institutions, which gives a broader perspective of the status of the implementation of this curriculum reform, and compiles relevant strategies and suggestions as a reference for teacher education institutions and government authorities for policy revision.

1. 吳清山, C. S.(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，261-293。
   連結：
2. 吳清山, C. S.(2017)。素養導向教師教育：理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政，112，14-27。
   連結：
3. 吳淑禎, S. C.(2011)。中等學校師資培育課程的發展特色與教育專業課程的能力指標分析。教育研究集刊，57(4)，1-41。
   連結：
4. 林陳涌, C. U.,黃嘉莉, J. L.,張民杰, M. J.,張玉山, Y. S.,張素貞, S. C.,吳淑禎(2014)。未來在等待的教師：前瞻師資培育計畫。中等教育，65(1)，165-182。
   連結：
5. 符碧真, B. J.(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，59-87。
   連結：
6. 陳殷哲, Y. C.,胡美雲, M. Y.(2019)。生活課程教師專業素養指標之研究—以教學能力成熟度模型與模糊層級分析法為途徑。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，1-24。
   連結：
7. 黃嘉莉, J. L.,陳學志, H. C.,王俊斌, C. P.,洪仁進, J. C.(2020)。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，1-35。
   連結：
8. Cheung, A. C.,Wong, P. M.(2012).Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong: Key findings from a large-scale survey study.The International Journal of Educational Management,26(1),39-54.
9. Hollins, E. R.(2011).Teacher preparation for quality teaching.Journal of Teacher Education,62(4),395-407.
10. Koenen, A.,Dochy, F.,Berghmans, I.(2015).A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,50,1-12.
11. Morse, J. M.,Field, P. A.(1995).Qualitative research methods for health professionals.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
12. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Patton、 Michael Quinn,吳芝儀（譯）, C. Y.(Trans.),李奉儒（譯）, F. I.(Trans.)(1995).質的評鑑與研究.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:桂冠=Laureate.
14. Seferoğlu, G.(2006).Teacher candidates’ reflections on some components of a pre-service English teacher education programme in Turkey.Journal of Education for Teaching,32(4),369-378.
15. 丁一顧, Y. K.,王孝維, X. W.(2020)。師資培育及藝術教育。中華民國教育年報，107，271-298。
16. 何縕琪, Y. C.,張景媛, C. Y.(2019)。素養導向師資培育教學：以慈濟大學為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(8)，51-56。
17. 吳勁甫, J. F.(2019)。師培生之核心素養—以國立中興大學師資培育中心為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(12)，24-31。
18. 林新發, X. F.,張凌凌, L. L.(2018)。教師專業素養指引之研訂。臺灣教育，711，67-77。
19. 侯禎塘, C. T.,魏民鈞, M. C.,蔣昇翰, S. H.(2018)。臺灣特殊教育師資培育的發展趨勢（二）。特殊教育與輔助科技半年刊，19，22-27。
20. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2012).中華民國師資培育白皮書.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author.
21. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2017)。教育部（2017）。師資培育法修正草案總說明。臺北市：作者。 [Ministry of Education (2017). General description of the revised draft of the Teacher Education Act. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]。
22. 教育部（2018）。中華民國教師專業素養指引─師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。臺北市：作者。 [Ministry of Education (2018). Guidance of ROC’s teacher professional competence standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
23. 教育部（2019b）。師資培育之大學辦理師資職前教育注意事項。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001905 [Ministry of Education (2019b). The cautions of pre-service teacher education by universities for teacher training. Retrieved from https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001905]
24. 教育部（2019a）。我國師資培育數量第三階段規劃方案。取自http://practice2.ncue.edu.tw/front/bin/download.phtml?Part=19040015&Nbr=694&Category=0] [Ministry of Education (2019a). The third stage plan for the number of teacher education in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://practice2.ncue.edu.tw/front/bin/download.phtml?Part=19040015&Nbr=694&Category=0]
25. 教育部（2006）。師資培育素質提升方案。取自 http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=A040080061003000-0950223 [Ministry of Education (2006). Policy execution for promoting teacher cultivation. Retrieved from http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=A040080061003000-0950223]
26. 許家驊, C. H.(2017)。中等學校／國民小學師資職前教育專業課程內容與中華民國教師專業標準之關係初探：教師樣貌及對師資培育之涵意省思。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(7)，7-13。
27. 楊智穎, J. Y.(2013)。前瞻學校本位的師資培育課程發展。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(1)，100-103。
28. 楊智穎, J. Y.(2019)。回應新課程政策變革的師資培育課程發展。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(4)，51-57。
29. 萬家春, C. C.(2019)。型塑完整之師資職前教育情境以迎接課程基準之啟動。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(11)，195-224。

1. 林秀錦(Hsiu-Chin Lin);呂金燮(Chin-Hsieh Lu)(2023)。運用「小老師」任務於特教師培素養導向課程之教學行動研究。教育研究集刊。(69:1)。43-81。