不同性別、獎學金等級選手知覺教練領導行為與內在動機之研究

A Study of Perceived Coaches' Leadership and Intrinsic Motivation among Players with Different Gender and Scholarship Status

10.6497/BSEPT.20050501_(6).0003

李麗珍(Li-Chen Lee)；陳淑滿(Shu-Man Chen)

認知評價理論 ； 內在動機 ； 教練領導行為 ； cognitive evaluation theory ； intrinsic motivation ； perceived coaches' leadership behavior

臺灣運動心理學報

6期（2005 / 05 / 01）

55 - 69

繁體中文

本研究主要目的：一、探討不同性別與獎金等級選手在知覺教練領導行為與內在動機之差異。二、探討教練領導行為與內在動機之相關情形。研究對象為708位選手（男生＝364、女生＝344)，平均年齡為19.72±2.41、球齡為6.93±4.37。在非比賽期間填寫，基本資料、教練領導行為量表與內在動機量表。研究結果發現：所有選手知覺教練領導行為在不同性別與獎學金等級並無交互作用；而內在動機在不同性別與獎學金等級有顯著的交互作用存在。最後，內在動機在知覺專制行為呈負相關，而與其他領導行為呈正相關。

The purposes of this study were to investigate the difference between perceived coaches' leadership and intrinsic motivation among players with different gender and scholarship status, and to examine the relationship between perceived coaches' leadership and intrinsic motivation. The participants of this study were 708 collegiate students (Male: 364, female: 344). Their average age, playing experience were 19.72±2.41 and 6.93±4.37 years, respectively. All participants completed demographic data, Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS), and Intrinsic Motivation Questionnaire (IMI) during non competition period. The results indicated that there was no interaction between perceived coaches' leadership and gender or scholarship status among all players whereas there was significant interaction between intrinsic motivation and gender or scholarship. Finally, intrinsic motivation was found positively correlated to all other coaches' leaderships but autocratic behavior.

1. 吳國銑(2000)。我國大專院校運動教練領導行爲比較研究。體育學報，28，59-68。
   連結：
2. 李炯煌(2003)。教練領導行爲與選手內在動機之相關研究。體育學報，34，123-134。
   連結：
3. 林錫波(2003)。目標難度與獎賞方式對壘球學習表現與內在動機的影響。大專體育學刊，5(1)，127-138。
   連結：
4. 賴世堤(2001)。高中（職）田徑教練領導行爲之研究。體育學報，30，185-194。
   連結：
5. Amorose, A. J.,Horn, T.(2000).Intrinsic motivation: Relationship with collegiate athletes` gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches` behavior.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,22,63-84.
6. Chelladurai, P.(1978).doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada..
7. Chelladurai, P.(1984).Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports.Journal of Sport Psychology,6,27-41.
8. Chelladurai, P.(1991).Leadership in sports: A review.International Journal of Sport Psychology,21,328-354.
9. Chelladurai, P.,Saleh, S. D.(1980).Dimension of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale.Journal of Sport Psychology,2,34-45.
10. Deci, E. L.(1975).Intrinsic motivation.New York:Plenum Press.
11. Deci, E. L.(1971).Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,18,105-115.
12. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1991).A motivational approach to self-integration in personality.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,38,237-288.
13. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
14. Frederick, C. M.,Ryan, R. M.(1995).Self-determination in sport: A review using cognitive evaluation theory.International Journal of Sport Psychology,26,5-23.
15. McAuley, E.,Duncan, T.,Tammen, V. V.(1989).Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,60,48-58.
16. Ryan, E. D.,L. I. Gedvelas,M. E. Kneer (Eds.)(1977).Proceedings of the national physical education association.Chicago:Office of Publications Serves.
17. Ryan, R. M.,C. H. Nadeau,W. R. Halliwell,K. M. Newell,G. C. Roberts (Eds.)(1980).Psychology of motor behavior and sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
18. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist,55(1),68-78.
19. Vallerand, R. J.,Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.,K. Pandolf (Ed.)(1987).Exercise and sport science reviews.New York:Macmillan.
20. Vallerand, R. J.,G. C. Roberts (Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
21. Weinberg, R. S.,Jackson, A.(1979).Competition and extrinsic rewards: Effection intrinsic motivation and attribution.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,50,494-502.
22. Weiss, M R.,Freidrichs, W. D.(1986).The influence of leader behaviors, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,8,332-346.
23. 王耀聰、馬君萍(2004)。先發與替補選手知覺教練領導行爲、內在動機與滿意度之相關研究。興大體育，7，155-165。
24. 李麗珍、陳淑滿(2003)。不同自覺能力與獎學金等級對於田徑選手內在動機之影響。台灣運動心理學會九十二年學術研討會，台北市:
25. 金明央(1999)。有無獎賞情境中運動樂趣及內在動機之比較研究。大專體育，43，73-80。
26. 柯竺村(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
27. 陳其昌(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
28. 楊純碧(1998)。運動教練領導行爲之「多元領導模式」介紹。大專體育，38，89-93。
29. 蔣憶德(2004)。甲組籃球選手之教練領導行爲及運動動機氣候對人在動機及滿意度之影響。台北市:?林。

1. 陳科嘉(2010)。優秀大專拔河選手教練領導與凝聚力之研究。文化體育學刊 ，11，37-46。
2. 許育光,刑志彬(2020)。台灣運動心理學研究回顧：主題焦點與年代趨勢之社會網絡分析。中華心理學刊，62(2)，299-320。
3. 黃惠芝(2008)。競技體操與啦啦隊選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。休閒產業管理學刊，1(2)，43-56。
4. 張瑞興(2008)。「運動教練領導」領域中涉及的前置變項：台灣近十年實證研究之分析。大專體育，95，148-152。
5. 趙榮瑞、黃惠芝(2008)。優秀大專啦啦隊選手知覺教練領導與團隊凝聚力之研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報，6，33-44。
6. 鍾陳偉、倪雅華、何正峰、王潔玲(2008)。不同性別籃球選手知覺教練領導行為、內在動機及滿足感之研究。北體學報，16，72-82。