學生運動員的健康促進生活型態：性別差異及相關變項

Health Promotion Lifestyle of Student Athletes: Gender Differences and Associated Measures

10.6497/BSEPT.20080501_(12).0002

李麗晶(Li-Ching Lee)；劉潔心(Chien-Hsing Liu)；季力康(Li-Kang Chi)；卓俊伶(Hank Jwo)

學生運動員 ； 性別差異 ； 健康促進生活型態 ； student athletes ； gender differences ； health promotion lifestyle

臺灣運動心理學報

12期（2008 / 05 / 01）

25 - 37

繁體中文

Purpose: This study investigated gender differences of health promotion lifestyle in student athletes, and the relationships among age, training years, weekly training hours, and health promotion lifestyle. Methods: Stratified sampling of 368 students participated (mean age=20 ± 1.8 years) from 18 universities in Taiwan, who admitted to colleges based on their sport performance. Results: One-way ANOVA showed that males had higher general scores on HPLP-S than those of their females counterparts (p＜.05); males also had significant higher subscale scores on social interpersonal relationships (p＜.05). No gender difference was found among self-actualization, health responsibility, nutrition, stress management, and social interpersonal relationships. Pearson Correlations revealed that health promotion lifestyle has no significant correlations with age and training years (r=-.01; .04 respectively, p＞.05), yet the weekly training hours per week was found positively correlated with health responsibility (r=.19, p＜.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, male athletes had greater health promotion lifestyle than the female ones; health promotion lifestyle had no relationship with age and training years. In addition, the longer the weekly training hours, the more responsible the college athletes are for their own health.

Purpose: This study investigated gender differences of health promotion lifestyle in student athletes, and the relationships among age, training years, weekly training hours, and health promotion lifestyle. Methods: Stratified sampling of 368 students participated (mean age=20 ± 1.8 years) from 18 universities in Taiwan, who admitted to colleges based on their sport performance. Results: One-way ANOVA showed that males had higher general scores on HPLP-S than those of their females counterparts (p＜.05); males also had significant higher subscale scores on social interpersonal relationships (p＜.05). No gender difference was found among self-actualization, health responsibility, nutrition, stress management, and social interpersonal relationships. Pearson Correlations revealed that health promotion lifestyle has no significant correlations with age and training years (r=-.01; .04 respectively, p＞.05), yet the weekly training hours per week was found positively correlated with health responsibility (r=.19, p＜.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, male athletes had greater health promotion lifestyle than the female ones; health promotion lifestyle had no relationship with age and training years. In addition, the longer the weekly training hours, the more responsible the college athletes are for their own health.

1. 黎天生、李光武、黃崇儒、陳建利、陳堅錐(2007)。探討學生運動員生涯發展的可行性。北體學報，15，214-222。
   連結：
2. 魏米秀、呂昌明(2005)。健康促進生活型態中文簡式量表之發展研究。衛生教育學報，24，25-46。
   連結：
3. Allison, M. T.(1984).Role conflict and the elite female athlete: Empirical findings and conceptual dilemmas.International Review for the Sociology of Sport,19,157-168.
4. Burns, R. D.,Schiller, M. R.,Merrick, M. A.,Wolf, K. N.(2004).Intercollegiate student athletes use of nutritional supplements and the role of athletic trainers and dietitians in nutrition counseling.Journal of American Diet Association,104,246-249.
5. Green, G. A.,Uryasz, F.,Petr, T. A.,Bray, C. D.(2001).NACC study of substance use and abuses habits of college student-athletes: Clinical investigation.Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine,11,51-56.
6. Harris, H. L.,Altekruse, M. K.,Engels, D. W.(2003).Helping freshman student athletes adjust to college life using psychoeducational groups.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,28,64-81.
7. Lally, P. S.,Kerr, G. A.(2005).The career planning, athletic identity, and student role identity of intercollegiate student athletes.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,76,275-285.
8. McAllister, D. R.,Motamedi, A. R.,Hame, S. L.,Shapiro, M. S.,Dorey, F. J.(2001).Quality of life assessment in elite collegiate athletes.The American Journal of Sports Medicine,29,806-810.
9. Pedersen, S.,Seidman, E.(2004).Team sports achievement and self-esteem development among urban adolescent girls.Psychology of Women Quarterly,28,141-156.
10. Pender, N. J.(1982).Health promotion in nursing practice.Norwalk, CT:Appleton-Centry-Crofts.
11. Potuto, J. R.,O''Hanlon, J.(2007).National study of student-atheletes regarding their experiences as college students.College Student Journal,41,947-967.
12. Selby, W.,Weinstein, H. M.,Bird, T. S.(1990).The health of university athletes: Attitudes, behaviors, and stressors.Journal of American College Health,39,11-18.
13. Walker, S. N.,Sechrist, K. R.,Pender, N. J.(1987).The health-promoting lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristics.Nursing Research,36,76-81.
14. Watt, S. K.,Morre III, J. L.(2001).Who are student athletes?.New Directions for Student Services,93,7-18.
15. Wu, T. Y.,Pender, N.(2002).Determinants of physical activity among Taiwanese adolescents: An application of the health promotion model.Research in Nursing & Health,25,25-36.
16. 吳姿瑩、卓俊伶(1998)。健康促進模式與健身運動促進。中華體育，12，51-61。
17. 李宜芳(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學。
18. 李麗晶(2001)。大專女性運動員的身體意意象與心因性厭食症及心因性暴食症傾向之相關研究。臺北市:科正。
19. 季力康(2000)。應重視對大學學生運動員之輔導工作。大專體育，47，3-4。
20. 陳永安(2001)。檢視小學體育教科書中的性別偏見現象。中華體育，15，99-105。
21. 黃毓華、邱啟潤(1996)。健康促進生活型態量表信度效度之評估。高雄醫學科學雜誌，12，529-537。
22. 葉素汝(2008)。失落的運動員－女性運動員的性別角色衝突。諮商與輔導，254，59-61。
23. 藍采風(1986)。生活的壓力與適應。臺北市:幼獅。

1. 陳政友,梁秉義(2014)。花蓮縣多元就業開發方案勞工失業經驗、族群與健康生活型態相關研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，42，27-58。
2. 黃芳銘、連婉如、張家銘、邱思慈(2011)。大學男女新生在健康促進生活型態測量恆等性之研究。測驗學刊，58(3)，453-478。
3. 劉麗芳(2023)。大專排球運動員健康促進生活型態之研究：以大專排球聯賽公開一級為例。臺大體育學報，45，35-47。
4. 張維嶽(2014)。訓練與工讀因素對運動績優生健康促進生活型態之影響。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(1)，130-137。
5. 張維嶽(2014)。運動績優生健康促進生活型態：性別、運動屬性等因素之探討。靜宜體育，8，27-41。