题名

動作表現與學習的帶寬回饋及年齡效應

并列篇名

The Effects of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results and Age Differences on Motor Performance and Learning

DOI

10.6497/BSEPT.20081101_(13).0002

作者

方正銘(Cheng-Ming Fang)；卓俊伶(Hank Jwo)

关键词

帶寬結果獲知 ； 引導假說 ； 年齡差異 ； bandwidth KR ； guidance hypothesis ； age differences

期刊名称

臺灣運動心理學報

卷期/出版年月

13期（2008 / 11 / 01）

页次

21 - 38

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of bandwidth knowledge of results (BWKR) and its age differences on motor performance and learning of spatial task. Ninety participants from third, sixth, and ninth grades were randomly assigned into BWO%, BW5%, and BW10% in each age stratification. Methods: All participants performed a linear position task consisting of 40 trials during acquisition phase, and a 5-minute immediate retention test consisting of 12 trials without KR information. The dependent variables were the scores of absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) of movement distance. Mixed designed three-way ANOVA (grades × BWKRs × blocks) with repeated measures on blocks during the acquisition phase was used. Independent two-way ANOVA (grades×BWKR5) was used for immediate retention. Results: (1) during acquisition phase, BWKRs and blocks were significantly different (p＜.05), in which BW5% was better than BW0% on AE and BW5%, BW10% were all better than BW0% on VE; (2) in immediate retention test, only BWKR on AE (p＜.05) was significantly different, in which BW10% was better than BW0%. Moreover BWKR and the interaction of grades × BWKRs were significantly different on VE (p＜.05), in which BW5% was better than BW0% in 3rd grade, BW5% and BW10% were better than BW0% in 6th grade, BW10% was better than BW0% in 9th grade, and 9th grade was better than 6th grade in BW0%. It was concluded that, for the simple linear movement for the young students. Conclusion: (1) BWKR was not only a performance variable but also a learning variable, and (2) the optimal level of BWKR on motor learning changed with age.
英文摘要

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of bandwidth knowledge of results (BWKR) and its age differences on motor performance and learning of spatial task. Ninety participants from third, sixth, and ninth grades were randomly assigned into BWO%, BW5%, and BW10% in each age stratification. Methods: All participants performed a linear position task consisting of 40 trials during acquisition phase, and a 5-minute immediate retention test consisting of 12 trials without KR information. The dependent variables were the scores of absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) of movement distance. Mixed designed three-way ANOVA (grades × BWKRs × blocks) with repeated measures on blocks during the acquisition phase was used. Independent two-way ANOVA (grades×BWKR5) was used for immediate retention. Results: (1) during acquisition phase, BWKRs and blocks were significantly different (p＜.05), in which BW5% was better than BW0% on AE and BW5%, BW10% were all better than BW0% on VE; (2) in immediate retention test, only BWKR on AE (p＜.05) was significantly different, in which BW10% was better than BW0%. Moreover BWKR and the interaction of grades × BWKRs were significantly different on VE (p＜.05), in which BW5% was better than BW0% in 3rd grade, BW5% and BW10% were better than BW0% in 6th grade, BW10% was better than BW0% in 9th grade, and 9th grade was better than 6th grade in BW0%. It was concluded that, for the simple linear movement for the young students. Conclusion: (1) BWKR was not only a performance variable but also a learning variable, and (2) the optimal level of BWKR on motor learning changed with age.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. Adams, J. A.(1971).A closed-loop theory of motor learning.Journal of Motor Behavior,3,111-150.
  2. Annett, J.(1969).Feedback and human behaviour.Baltimore:Penguin.
  3. Bilodeau, E. A.,Bilodeau, I. M.(1958).Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology,55,379-383.
  4. Cauraugh, J. H.,Chen, D.,Radlo, J.(1993).Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning.Research Quarterly for Exercese and Sport,64,413-417.
  5. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
  6. Elwell, J. L.,Grindley, G. S.(1938).The effect of knowledge of results on learning and performance.British Journal of Psychology,29,39-53.
  7. Lee, T. D.,Carnahan, H.(1990).Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor learning: More than just a relative frequency effect.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42,777-789.
  8. Lee, T. D.,Maraj, B. K. V.(1994).Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,65,244-249.
  9. Newell, K. M.,Kennedy, J. A.(1978).Knowledge of results and children's motor learning.Developmental Psychology,14,531-536.
  10. Piaget, J.(1947).The psychology of intelligence.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul..
  11. Piaget, J.(1952).The origins of intelligence in children.New York:International Universities Press.
  12. Reeve, T. G.,Dornier, L. A.,Weeks, D. J.(1990).Precision of knowledge of results: Consideration of the accuracy requirements imposed by the task.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,61,284-290.
  13. Salmoni, A. W.,Schmidt, R. A.,Walter, C. B.(1984).Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal.Psychological Bulletin,95,355-386.
  14. Schmidt, R. A.(1975).A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.Psychological Review,82,225-260.
  15. Schmidt, R. A.,J. Requin (Eds.),G. E. Stelmach (Eds.)(1991).Tutorials in motor neuroscience.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
  16. Schmidt, R. A.,Lee, T. D.(2005).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  17. Sherwood, D. E.(1988).Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency.Perceptual and Motor Skills,66,535-542.
  18. Singer, R. N.,A. Stull (Eds.),H. M. Eckert (Eds.)(1986).The academy papers: The effects of physical activity on children.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  19. Swinnen, S. P.,H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.)(1996).Advances in motor learning and control.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  20. Swinnen, S. P.,Schmidt, R. A.,Nicholson, D. E.,Shapiro, D. C.(1990).Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,16,706-716.
  21. Thorndike, E. L.(1927).The law of effect.American Journal of Psychology,39,212-222.
  22. Winstein, C. J.,Schmidt, R. A.(1990).Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,16,677-691.
  23. Wulf, G.,Schmidt, R. A.(1989).The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,15,748-757.
  24. 張春興(1994)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華書局。
  25. 陳玉芬、卓俊伶(1998)。特定範圍結果獲知對高爾夫推桿動作之空間準確性與錯誤偵察的影響。體育學報，7，249-258。
  26. 賴世烱(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
  27. 賴世烱、卓俊伶(1999)。晚期兒童動作表現的性別與年齡差異。體育學報，27，43-50。
被引用次数
  1. 陳孟文、林靜兒(2013)。自我控制的觀察學習與回饋促進動作學習。大專體育學刊，15(1)，21-28。
  2. 黃彩玉、王榮金(2012)。不同型態回饋策略在合作學習情境下對木球學習成效之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，11(2)，157-165。
  3. 謝坤晉(2013)。同儕互動合作學習策略對大專羽球學習成效之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，12(3)，234-243。
  4. 楊梓楣、施長志、卓俊伶(2017)。書寫研究典範之回顧與認定：工作任務與測量取向。臺灣運動心理學報，17(2)，69-91。
  5. 葉秀煌(2011)。同儕互動回饋策略在合作學習情境下對木球學習成效與動機之研究。體育學報，44(1)，131-144。
print cancel