高中學生的行為抑制／行為激發系統與運動自我設限之相關研究

The Relationships of Behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral Approach System and Exercise Self-Handicapping among Senior High School Students

10.6497/BSEPT.20130501_13(1).0004

楊心妮(Hsin-Ni Yang)；季力康(Li-Kang Chi)

人格傾向 ； 趨近－逃避 ； 保護機制 ； personality tendencies ； approach-avoidance ； protection mechanisms

臺灣運動心理學報

13卷1期（2013 / 05 / 01）

65 - 75

繁體中文

目的：本研究主要目的在以Gray（1982, 1990）的人格理論為研究架構，探討高中學生行為抑制系統／行為激發系統與運動自我設限之間的關係。方法：研究對象為台南縣某高中參與體育課的188名學生（男生67名，女生121名），平均年齡17.22 ± 0.86歲，在一般休息情境下填寫問卷，包括「行為抑制與行為激發量表」與「運動自我設限量表」。結果：經皮爾遜積差相關與線性迴歸分析顯示：一、行為抑制系統與運動自我設限呈正相關，而行為激發系統與自我設限呈現呈負相關。二、行為抑制系統為運動自我設限的正向預測因子，而行為激發系統為自我設限的負向預測因子。結論：根據本研究發現，人格傾向不同確實對於個人之運動自我設限有所影響。

Purpose: Based on the construct of Personality Theory (Gray, 1982), present study tried to explore the relation of behavioral inhibition/behavioral approach system and exercise self-handicapping among senior high school students. Methods: The participants were 188 senior high school students recruited from Tainan County High School (male = 67, female = 121), and the average years was 17.22 ± 0.86 years old; they were asked to complete behavioral inhibition system, behavioral approach system scale, and exercise self-handicapping scale. The data was analyzed by Pearson correlation and linear regression. Results: 1. Behavioral inhibition system was positively correlated to exercise self-handicapping, whereas behavioral approach system was negatively correlated to exercise self-handicapping. 2. Behavioral inhibition system is a positive prediction factor to self-handicapping whereas behavioral approach system is a negative prediction factor to self-handicapping. Conclusion: According to the results, the findings indicated different personality tendencies would affect individual self-handicapping in exercise.

1. Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). The Self-handicapping Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Princeton University..
2. Berglas, S.,Jones, E. E.(1978).Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36,405-417.
3. Carver, C.,White, T.(1994).Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,319-333.
4. Elliot, A. J.,Thrash, T. M.(2002).Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach-avoidance temperaments and goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82,804-818.
5. Elliot, A.,Church, M.(1997).A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,218-232.
6. Elliot, A.,Harackiewicz, J.(1996).Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1058-1068.
7. Elliot, A.,Sheldon, K.(1997).Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73,171-185.
8. Feil, J.,Hasking, P.(2008).The relationship between personality, coping strategies and alcohol use.Addiction Research and Theory,16,526-537.
9. Gray, J. A.(1990).Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition.Cognition and Emotion,4,269-288.
10. Gray, J. A.(1982).The neuropsychology of anxiety.Oxford:Clarendon.
11. Higgins, R. L.(Ed.),Snyder, C. R.(Ed.),Berglas, S.(Ed.)(1990).Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't.New York:Plenum Press.
12. Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1994).Personality variables as antecedents of precompetitive mood state temporal patterning.International Journal of Sport Psychology,25,347-365.
13. Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1998).Self-handicapping and self-esteem.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,10,175-184.
14. Putnam, S. P.,Stifter, C. A.(2005).Behavioral approach-inhibition in toddlers: Prediction from infancy, positive and negative affective components, and relations with behavior problems.Child Development,76,212-226.
15. Ryska, T. A.,Yin, Z.,Boyd, M.(1999).The role of dispositional goal orientation and team climate on situational self-handicapping among young athletes.Journal of Sport Behavior,22,410-425.
16. Ryska, T. A.,Yin, Z.,Cooley, D.(1998).Effects of trait and situational self-handicapping on competitive anxiety among athletes.Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social,17,48-56.
17. Yen, J. Y.,Yen, C. F.,Chen, C. S.,Chang, Y. H.,Yeh, Y. C.,Ko, C. H.(2011).The bidirectional interactions between addiction, behavior approach and behavior inhibition systems among adolescents in a prospective study.Psychiatry Research,200(2-3),588-592.
18. 邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南圖書。
19. 陳瑋瑀(2001)。桃園縣，臺灣，國立體育學院。
20. 廖聆岑(2001)。臺南，臺灣，國立成功大學。