體育課無動機量表中文化後的信度與效度：以國小和國中學生為對象

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Amotivation in Physical Education Scale Among Elementary and Junior High School Students

10.6497/BSEPT2015.1502.01

王文宜(Wen-Yi Wang)；陳婷婷(Ting-Ting Chen)

自我決定理論 ； 學習動機 ； 加速規 ； 身體活動 ； self-determination theory ； learning motivation ； accelerometer ； PA

臺灣運動心理學報

15卷2期（2015 / 11 / 01）

1 - 17

繁體中文

目的：本研究旨在翻譯Shen, Wingert, Li, Sun，與Rukavina（2010）發展之體育課無動機量表，並探討其中文化後的信度與效度。方法：本研究共包含三個階段，第一階段為英文版量表的中文翻譯和以393位體育課學習動機較弱的國小學生為對象，進行測量工具的項目分析及驗證性因素分析；第二階段是以341位體育課學習動機較弱的國中學生為對象，進行測量工具的跨群組不變性檢驗；第三階段是以30位低動機的國小學生配戴加速規來探討無動機與體育課身體活動量的關係。結果：本研究結果指出體育課無動機量表包含能力信念、努力信念、工作價值及工作特性等四個因素，共16個題目，內部一致性的信度良好。四因素的測量模式也與觀察資料有適當的適配度。而本測量模式也具有跨群組的不變性，適用於國中學生群體。最後，無動機程度與體育課的中高強度身體活動量呈現負相關。結論：體育課無動機量表經過中文化之後，具有不錯的信度和效度，可以用來幫助體育老師和研究者更深入了解低學習動機學生的起因，發展更有效的教學策略來幫助其提升體育課的參與程度。未來研究也可以進一步的探討與體育課無動機有關的議題，並且進行跨文化的比較。

Purpose: This study examined the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Amotivation in Physical Education Scale (AI-PE; Shen, Wingert, Li, Sun, & Rukavina, 2010). Method: Three stages were conducted in this study. At the first stage, the original AI-PE was translated into Chinese and 393 pupils who were less interested in PE completed the AI-PE for processing the item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. At the second stage, 341 junior high school students who were low motivation in PE were recruited for testing the cross-group invariance of the AI-PE. At the third stage, 30 pupils who were less motivated in PE were recruited to examine the relation between the AI-PE and physical activity levels recorded by an accelerometer in one PE class. Results: The results indicated that the 16-item AI-PE contained four subscales, including Ability Beliefs, Effort Beliefs, Value of Task, and Task Characteristics, with a moderate reliability. The 4-factor model showed a good fit to the data observed. Further, the AI-PE demonstrated satisfactory cross-group invariance by using a sample of middle school students. The AI-PE was found to negatively relate to the level of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in PE. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the AI-PE shows adequate psychometric properties and can be extended for use with understanding the reasons why students demonstrate less motivation in PE. PE teachers and researchers can utilize the information to develop effective teaching strategies. Future studies are suggested to conduct cross-cultural comparisons by using the AI-PE.

1. 陳其昌、謝文娟(2009)。國中體育教師領導風格對學生上體育課動機的影響。大專體育學刊，11(2)，31-45。
   連結：
2. 陳素青、詹俊成、鄭志富(2013)。臺北市高中體育教師領導風格與班級氣氛對體育課學習動機之影響。體育學報，46，257-272。
   連結：
3. 劉義群(2004)。不同性質體育課程學生的知覺動機氣候、自覺能力、參與體育課動機與滿意度之研究。北體學報，12，123-135。
   連結：
4. 蔣憶綺、季力康(2013)。無動機模式在體育課之應用。中華體育季刊，27(4)，343-349。
   連結：
5. 韓大衛、蔡博隆、盧居福(2005)。臺北市國小學生體育課學習需求內涵調查研究。大專體育學刊，7(2)，1-9。
   連結：
6. 蘇美如、黃英哲(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係－應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，33-50。
   連結：
7. Baker, S. R.(2004).Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance.Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social,23,189-202.
8. Carlson, T. B.(1995).Now I think I can: The reaction of eight low-skilled students to sport education.ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal,42(4),6-8.
9. Coakley, J.,White, A.(1992).Making decisions: Gender and sport participation among British adolescents.Sociology of Sport Journal,9,20-35.
10. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2000).The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Humanneeds and the self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry,11,227-268.
11. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
12. Erwin, H. E.,Stellino, M. B.,Beets, M. W.,Beighle, A.,Johnson, C. E.(2013).Physical education lesson content and teacher style and elementary students' motivation and physical activity levels.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,32,321-334.
13. Freedson, P.,Pober, D.,Janz, K. F.(2005).Calibration of accelerometer output for children.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,37,523-530.
14. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham R. L.,Black, W. C.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.UK:Prentice Hall International.
15. How, Y. M.,Whipp, P.,Dimmock, J.,Jackson, B.(2013).The effects of choice on autonomous motivation, perceived autonomy support, and physical activity levels in high school physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,32,131-148.
16. Jones, P. S.,Lee, J. W.,Phillips, L. R.,Zhang, X. E.,Jaceldo, K. B.(2001).An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research.Nursing Research,50,300-304.
17. Legault, L.,Green-Demers, I.,Pelletier, L.(2006).Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support.Journal of Educational Psychology,98,567-582.
18. Martin, C. L.(1988).Enhancing children's satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms.The Physical Educator,45,196-209.
19. Mazyari, M.,Kashef, M. M.,Hassan, M.,Ameri, S.,Araghi, M.(2012).Students' amotivation in physical education activities and teachers' social support.World Applied Sciences Journal,20,1570-1573.
20. Morgan, C. F.,Beighle, A.,Pangrazi, R. P.(2007).Physical education's contribution to daily physical activity levels of elementary school children.Research Quarterly in Exercise and Sport,78,407-412.
21. Ntoumanis, N.(2001).A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71,225-242.
22. Ntoumanis, N.,Pensgaard, A. M.,Martin, C.,Pipe, K.(2004).An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,26,197-214.
23. Pelletier, L. G.,Fortier, M. S.,Vallerand, R. J.,Briere, N. M.(2001).Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study.Motivation and Emotion,25,279-306.
24. Pelletier, L. G.,Fortier, M. S.,Vallerand, R. J.,Tuson, K. M.,Brière, N. M.,Blais, M. R.(1995).Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS).Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,17,35-53.
25. Perlman, D. J.,Goc Karp, G.(2010).A self-determined perspective of the sport education model.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,15,401-418.
26. Sallis, J. F.,McKenzie, T. L.(1991).Physical education's role in public health.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62,124-137.
27. Shen, B.,Li, W.,Sun, H.,Rukavina, P. B.(2010).The Influence of inadequate teacher-to-student social support on amotivation of physical education student.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,29,417-432.
28. Shen, B.,McCaughtry, N.,Martin, J.(2008).The influence of domain specificity on motivation in physical education: Between and within domain relations.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,79,333-343.
29. Shen, B.,Wingert, R. K.,Li, W.,Sun, H.,Rukavina, P. B.(2010).An amotivation model in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,29,72-84.
30. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions.Journal of Educational Psychology,95,97-110.
31. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Pensgaard, A. M.(2005).The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and cooperative structures on the psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task: A self-determination approach.Motivation and Emotion,29,41-68.
32. Vallerand, R. J.,Pelletier, L. G.,Blais, M. R.,Brière, N. M.,Senecal, C.,Vallieres, E. F.(1993).On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale.Educational and Psychological Measurement,53,150-172.
33. Vlachopoulos, S. P.,Katartzi, E. S.,Kontou, M. G.(2013).Fitting multidimensional amotivation into the self-determination theory nomological network: Application in school physical education.Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,17,40-61.
34. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
35. 吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式：方法與實務運用。高雄:麗文文化。
36. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北:五南。
37. 吳淑芳(2006)。國外量表之兩階段翻譯及信、效度測試。護理雜誌，53，65-71。
38. 林季燕、季力康、劉義群(2003)。體育課動機量表之信度與效度分析。大專體育學術專刊，449-458。
39. 陳其昌、謝文娟(2008)。國中生體育課動機量表的編製與測量。休閒運動期刊，7，97-108。
40. 陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。論文統計分析實務：SPSS與AMOS的運用。臺北:五南。

1. 許哲瀚,張珽宇,張炳華,卓燕燕,卓良珍(2022)。中文版失智症患者社會功能評估量表之發展。管理實務與理論研究，16(1)，89-104。
2. 徐偉庭,尚憶薇(2022)。學生設計遊戲模式之應用與研究展望。中華體育季刊，36(2)，109-116。