题名

專案完成時間延遲原因之研究

并列篇名

On the Research of the Delay Causes of the Network Completion Time

DOI

10.29950/JHKUM.200801.0004

作者

褚文明(Wen-Ming Chu)

关键词

計畫評核術 ; 隨機性專案網路 ; 專案網路 ; PERT ; Stochastic network ; Project network

期刊名称

興國學報

卷期/出版年月

9期(2008 / 01 / 01)

页次

45 - 57

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

根據Coppendale(1995:35-38)及Chatzoglou and Macaulay(1996:173-183)的研究,平均僅約10%-15%的大型專案能夠如期完成,餘多數均會發生執行延遲的現象,這不僅造成專案完成時間上的拖延,更會讓企業經營成本的負荷增加。在實務上,專案所有的作業時間均為隨機變數,因此確定性專案網路的分析工具(例如CPM)已無法適用,而計畫評核術(PERT)對大型專案網路的時間估算,亦會出現相當大的誤差,因此專案完成時間無法獲準確的估測,若無適當的趕工,往往會有延遲的情況發生。本文即針對專案延遲的現象做研究,針對專案執行的過程做系統的分析,探討出專案延遲的原因,並發現主要是源於「最長路徑偏差(LPB)」及「專案網路路徑相依」兩現象所造成,論文中並針對該兩現象以實例來作說明。

英文摘要

There is evidences from Coppendale (1995: 35-38)及 Chatzoglou and Macaulay (1996: 173-183), which indicate that for large projects, only approximately 10~15% of them finish their works on time. The majority of them overrun not only their planned schedule but also their project budget. Since all the activities of the networks are practically random variable, the analysis tools used in the deterministic network, do not work any more in the stochastic network. The most popular Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) was applied for the approximation of the network completion time, but it would cause considerably inaccuracy in the approximation and it is usually need work overtime for project to avoid the delay. This paper tries to deep into the caused reasons of the project delay through the system analysis on the project running executions, and found out two of the principal causes: ”The Longest Path Bias (LPB)” and ”The dependence between paths in the network”. We will use real instance example to explain how their effects in the networks.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Adlakha, V. G.,Kulkarni, V. G.(1989).A classsified bibliography of research on stochastic PERT networks: 1966-1987.Information Systems and Operational Research,3(27),272-296.
  2. Bigelow, C. G.(1962).Bibliograghy on project planning and control by network analysis: 1959-1961.Operations Research,10,728-731.
  3. Burt, J. M.,Garman, M. B.(1971).Conditional Monte Carlo: A simulation technique for stochastic network analysis.Management Science,3(18)
  4. Chatzoglou, P.,Macaulay, L.(1996).A review of existing nodels for project planning and estimation and the need for a new approach.International Journal of Project Management,14,173-183.
  5. Coppendate, J.(1995).Manage risk in product and process development and avoid unpleasant surprises.Engineering Management Journal,February,35-38.
  6. Devroye, L. P.(1979).Inequalities for the completion times of stochastic PERT networks.Mathematic of Operations Research,4(4),441-447.
  7. Dodin, B. M.(1985).Approximating the distribution function in stochastic networks.Computers and Operations Research,3(12),251-264.
  8. Dodin, B. M.(1985).Bounding the project completion time distribution in PERT networks.Operations Research,4(33),862-881.
  9. Dodin, B. M.,Sirvanci, M.(1990).Stochastic networks and the extreme value distribution.Computers and Operations Research,4(17),397-409.
  10. Elmaghraby, S. E.(1977).Activity networks: Project planning and control by network models.New York:Wiley.
  11. Fisher, D.L.,Saisi, D.,Goldstein, W.M.(1985).Stochastic PERT networks: OP diagrams critical paths and the project completion time.Computers and Operations Research,5(12),471-482.
  12. Gallagher, C.(1987).A note on PERT assumption.Management Science,33,1360-1362.
  13. Giovanni, M.(1994).PERT-path network technique: a new approach to project planning.International Journal of Project Management,2(12),89-99.
  14. Grubbs, F. E.(1962).Attempts to validate some PERT statistics or picking on PERT.Operations Research,10,912-915.
  15. Harley, H. O.,Wortham, A. W.(1966).A statistical theory for PERT critical path analysis.Management Science,10(12),469-481.
  16. Kerzner, H.(1979).Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and control.New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  17. Kleindorfer, G. B.(1971).Bounding distributions for stochastic logic.Operations Research,7(19),1586-1601.
  18. Klingel, A. R., Jr.(1966).Bias in PERT project completion time calculations for a real network.Management Science,4(13),476-489.
  19. Kolisch, R.,Sprecher, A.(1996).PSPLIB-A project scheduling problem library.European Journal of Operational Research,96,205-216.
  20. Lerda-Ilberg, S.(1966).Bibliograghy on project planning and control by network analysis: 1962-1965.Operations Research,14,925-931.
  21. MacCrimmon, K. R.,Ryacec, C. A.(1964).An analytical study of the PERT assumptions.Operations Research,12,16-37.
  22. Mehrotra, K.,Chai, J.,Pillutal, S.(1996).A study of approximating the moments of job completion time in PERT networks.Journal of Operations Management,3(14),277-289.
  23. Pontrandolfo, P.(2000).Project duration in stochastic networks by the PERT-path technique.International Journal of Project Management,18,215-222.
  24. Robillard, P.,Trahan, M.(1977).The completion time of PERT networks.Operations Research,25,15-29.
  25. Sasieni, W.(1986).A note on PERT times.Management Science,32,1652-1653.
  26. Sculli, D.(1983).The completion time of PERT networks.Journal of the Operational Research Society,1(25),155-158.
  27. Shogan, A. W.(1977).Bounding distributions for stochastic PERT network.Networks,7,359-381.
  28. Sigal, C. E.,Pritsker, A. A. B.,Solberg, J. J.(1979).The use of cutsets in Monte Carlo analysis of stochastic networks.Mathmatics and Computers in Simulation,21,376-384.
  29. Splede, J.G.(1977).Bounds for the distribution function of network variables.First Symposium of Operations Research,3,113-123.
  30. Whitenhourse, G.E.(1973).Systems Analysis and Design Using Network Techniques.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  31. William, T.M.(1992).Criticality in stochastic networks.Operations Research Society Journal,43,353-357.