都會運動公園自行車活動參與者生活型態容忍度、遊憩衝突與滿意度之研究

Lifestyle Tolerance, Recreation Conflict, and Satisfaction Among Urban Sport Park Bikers

10.6547/tassm.2016.0002

葉怡矜(Yi-Jin Ye)；鄭雅汶(Ya-Wen Cheng)

目標干擾 ； 多元遊憩使用 ； 調適行為 ； goal interference ； multiple recreation usage ； coping behavior

臺灣體育運動管理學報

16卷1期（2016 / 06 / 30）

27 - 51

繁體中文

在地狹人稠的都會運動公園，遊憩活動的設計大部份為多元遊憩使用之規劃。然而，因不同活動的參與者間資源競爭與遊憩目標受到干擾，造成遊憩衝突的發生，因此本研究目的為瞭解都會運動公園自行車活動參與者之內團體(自行車活動參與者) 與外團體 (散步者) 遊憩衝突程度，並探討自行車活動參與者的生活型態容忍度、遊憩衝突及滿意度的關係。本研究方法為量化研究，研究工具為信效度良好之封閉式問卷，並採便利抽樣法進行實地問卷調查，共回收371 份問卷；研究資料分析方法包括描述性統計、皮爾森相關分析與多元迴歸分析。研究結果發現，都會運動公園自行車活動參與者： 1.生活型態容忍度與遊憩衝突並無顯著負相關；2. 生活型態容忍度愈高，滿意度愈高；3. 知覺遊憩衝突與滿意度無顯著負相關；4.知覺內團體遊憩衝突負向影響整體騎乘體驗滿意度；5.生活型態容忍度比內團體遊憩衝突對整體騎乘體驗滿意度較具影響力。為了提升整體騎乘體驗滿意度，本研究建議規劃自行車道分道以降低內團體衝突，並且採用教育宣導活動共同遊憩價值與目標以提高生活型態容忍度；未來遊憩衝突相關研究，建議可進行調適行為之探討。

In congested urban area, sport parks were designed for multiple recreation usages. However, different types of visitors perceived recreation conflict due to resource competition and goal interference. The purposes of this study were to investigate recreation conflict between bikers (in-group) and hikers (out-group), and to explore the relationships among the lifestyle tolerance, recreation conflict, and satisfaction of urban sport park bikers. The research method was quantitative and the research tool was a closed-ended survey with high reliability and validity. The subjects of this study were urban sport park’s bikers and were selected through a convenience sampling method. A total of 371 valid surveys were collected on-site. Data were analyzed according to descriptive statistics, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The results were as follows. First, no relationship was found between lifestyle tolerance and recreation conflict. Second, a positive relationship was observed between lifestyle tolerance and satisfaction. Third, no relationship was determined between recreation conflict and satisfaction. Fourth, while in-group conflict increased, biking satisfaction decreased. Fifth, lifestyle tolerance contributed more to the biking satisfaction than did in-group conflict. According to the results, two-way bike trails are recommended for decreasing in-group conflict in urban sport parks. Moreover, enhancing lifestyle tolerance by promoting bikers’ similar recreation value may increase biking satisfaction. For the future recreation conflict research, coping behavior could be discussed.

1. 王正平(2004)。登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者遊憩衝突之研究。戶外遊憩研究，17(4)，71-91。
   連結：
2. 林俐吟、張軒瑄、高俊雄(2011)。陽明山登山自行車者的衝突敏感性、遊憩衝突與調適行為關係之研究。觀光休閒學報，17(3)，411-433。
   連結：
3. 許建民、鄭硯青(2011)。景點意象與遊憩滿意度關係之研究─以新竹市17 公里海岸線自行車道為例。休閒產業管理學刊，4(1)，57-71。
   連結：
4. 顏家芝、薛雅菁、徐慧蓉、趙又萱、廖梨棉(2002)。都會公園單車活動與直排輪活動／散步者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，15(1)，1-16。
   連結：
5. 衛生署國民健康局 (2010) 。運動情形男女有別─98 年度國民運動行為調查結果說明。取自衛生署國民健康局網址http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPnet/Portal/。
6. (1990).Social Science and Natural Resource Recreation Management.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
7. Blahna, J. B.,Smith, K. S.,Anderson, J. A.(1995).Backcountry llama packing: Visitor perceptions of acceptability and conflict..Leisure Sciences,17(3),185-204.
8. Bricker, K. S.,Kerstetter, D. L.(2000).Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists.Leisure Sciences,22(4),233-257.
9. Carothers, P.,Vaske, J.,Donnelly, M.(2001).Social values versus interpersonal conflict among hikers and mountain bikers.Leisure Sciences,23(1),47-61.
10. Chavez, D.(1996).Mountain biking: Direct, indirect and bridge building management styles.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,14,21-35.
11. Crompton, J. L.,Love, L. L.(1995).The predictive value of alternative approaches to evaluating quality of a festival.Journal of Travel Research,34(1),11-24.
12. Festinger, L.(1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
13. Gilbert, G.,Peterson, G.,Lime, D.(1972).Towards a model of travel behavior in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area.Environment and Behavior,4,131-157.
14. Hammitt, W.E.,McDonald, C.D.,Cordell, H.K.(1982).Perceived need for visitor management controls and corresponding support for various river use management strategies.Forest and River Recreation: Research Update,St. Paul, MN:
15. Ivy, M. I.,Stewart, W. P.,Lue, C.(1992).Exploring the role of tolerance in recreation conflict.Journal of Leisure Research,24(4),348-360.
16. Jackson, E. L.,Wong, R. G.(1982).Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta.Journal of Leisure Research,14(1),47-62.
17. Jacob, G.,Schreyer, R.(1980).Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Leisure Research,12(4),368-380.
18. Lazarus, R. S.,Folkman, S.(1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping.New york, NY:Spring Publishing.
19. Lee, J.,Graefe, A. R.,Burns, R. C.(2004).Service quality, satisfaction, and behavioral intention among forest visitors.Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing,17(1),73-82.
20. Lee, T. H.(2009).A structural model to examine how destination image, attitude, and motivation effect the future behavior of tourists.Leisure Sciences,31,215-236.
21. Lime, D.(1977).Managing Colorado river whitewater: The carrying capacity strategy.Logan, UT:Utah State University.
22. Manning, R. E.(1999).Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction.Corvallis, OR:Oregon State University Press.
23. Manning, R. E.(2011).Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction.Corvallis, OR:Oregon State University Press.
24. Manning, R. E.,Anderson, L. E.(2012).Managing outdoor recreation: Case studies in the national parks.Cambridge, MA:CABI.
25. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
26. Peterson, G.,Lime, D.(1979).People and their behavior: A challenge for recreation management.Journal of Forestry,77,343-346.
27. Ramthun, R.(1995).Factors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers.Leisure Sciences,17,159-169.
28. Thapa, B.,Graefe, A.(2004).Recreation conflict and tolerance among skiers and snowboarders.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,22(1),37-52.
29. Todd, S.,Graefe, A.(1989).Level of experience and perception of conflict among canoeists on the Delaware River.Proceedings of the 1989 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium,Broomall, PA:
30. Vaske, J. J.,Carothers, P.,Donnelly, M. P.,Baird, B.(2000).Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders.Leisure Sciences,22(4),297-313.
31. Vaske, J. J.,Dyar, R.,Timmons, N.(2004).Skill level and recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders.Leisure Sciences,26(2),215-225.
32. Vaske, J. J.,Needham, M.,Cline Jr., R.(2007).Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists.Journal of Leisure Research,39(1),182-195.
33. Wang, C.(2001).Syracuse,University of New York.
34. Watson, A. E.,Niccolucci, M. J.(1992).Place of residence and hiker-horse conflict in the Sierras.Proceedings of the Symposium on Social Aspects and Recreation Research,Albany, CA:
35. Watson, A. E.,Niccolucci, M. J.(1992).Defining past-experience dimensions for wildness recreation.Leisure Sciences,14,89-103.
36. Watson, A. E.,Niccolucci, M. J.,Williams, D. R.(1994).The nature of conflict between hikers and recreational stock users in the John Muir Wilderness.Journal of Leisure Research,26(4),372-385.
37. 李美枝(1986)。社會心理學－理論研究與應用。台北:大洋。
38. 李素馨、張淑貞、林妮瑱(2006)。臺中都會公園夜間遊客遊憩動機與安全認知之研究。造園景觀學報，12(3)，21-24。
39. 沈芷君(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育大學。
40. 邱皓政(2009)。量化研究與統計分析SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
41. 張尹薰(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，世新大學。
42. 教育部體育署(2013)。中華民國102 年運動統計。臺北市:教育部體育署。
43. 鍾文玲、林晏州(1993)。釣魚者遊憩衝突認知之研究。戶外遊憩研究，6(1)，55-79。

1. 顏宏旭,張峻豪(2019)。運用實景情境模擬影片探討都會區自行車道之衝突管理。都市與計劃，46(1)，61-85。