自行車認真休閒者遊憩專門化進展歷程研究

Exploring Recreation Specialization Progression and Changes in Serious Leisure Participants: A Study on Cyclists

10.6547/tassm.201806_18(1).0003

許建民(Chien-Ming Hsu)；丁志堅(Tsu-Jen Ding)；徐嬿琇(Yen-Hsiu Hsu)

學習意願 ； 學習能力 ； 社會機制 ； 環境態度 ； learning will ； learning competency ； social mechanisms ； environmental attitude

臺灣體育運動管理學報

18卷1期（2018 / 06 / 01）

53 - 87

繁體中文

目的：本研究的主要目的在瞭解自行車騎乘者認真投入這項活動的歷程和改變，以遊憩專門化進展的概念為基礎，嘗試獲得此一歷程的相關回答，包含專門化的前置因素、改變的社會機制和專門化對個人及遊憩行為的影響。方法：以自行車的騎乘頻率高低和加入車隊與否為兩軸進行受訪者區隔與選擇，並採取立意取樣方式邀請14名自行車友進行訪談，其後將訪談結果繕打成逐字稿。採用資料驅動的編碼方式將逐字稿進行編碼，並比較不同群體的差異。結果：不是所有的自行車愛好者都有往更高階騎乘技術提升的渴望，這個渴望和個人的年齡以及最初的騎乘動機有關。個人和環境因素都是影響遊憩專門化進展的前置因素，並且進展具體展現在認知、情感和行為三者的改變上。有些受訪者會面臨生涯偶發事件而降低參與，不過這類型事件的影響通常是較短暫的，另生命週期改變則對青壯族群帶來較大的影響。最後，遊憩專門化也讓遊憩參與者在個人體系、活動體系和環境體系的看法上有所轉變。結論：雖然不是每個人都想成為專家，但這個遊憩專門化進展的歷程確實也提供吾人對深度休閒涉入的進一步瞭解。根據本研究之發現，給有意進展的自行車騎乘者提出參與的建議。最後，研究者亦針對研究過程中所獲得的省思，給後續研究提出未來研究可行方向之建議。

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the changes and progression that have occurred among serious leisure cyclists. Based on the concept of recreation specialization, this study identified the antecedents of recreation specialization, the effect of social mechanisms on recreation specialization, and the effect of recreation specialization on recreation behavior. Methods: Using the frequency of bike riding and enrollment in a bike team as base criteria for sample selection, this study selected 14 cyclists through purposive sampling. The in-depth interview method was used to collect relevant information, which was subsequently converted into verbatim text. A data-driven approach was adopted to classify and compare the groups. Results: First, not all cycling enthusiasts had a desire to advance their skills. Desire was found to be related to the cyclists’ age and initial motivation for riding. Second, individual and environmental factors were antecedents of recreation specialization. The changes and progression that have occurred among serious leisure cyclists can be explained through cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects. Third, some cycling enthusiasts were affected by career contingencies, but the effects of these contingencies were usually minimal, whereas with changes in life course, the young adult group was more likely to be affected compared with the other age groups in this study. Last, recreation specialization may influence individual systems, activity systems, and environmental systems. Conclusion: Although not all recreationists have a desire to be experts, the progression processes could help us understand the progress of serious leisure recreationists. Based on the findings, we present suggestions for those who wish to progress in cycling and also present future research opportunities.

1. 王志宏、張繼文(2013)。認真性休閒與遊憩專門化之關係：社會資本之中介效果。戶外遊憩研究，26(1)，105-134。
   連結：
2. 邱思慈、林欣怡、張家銘(2010)。登山自行車騎士專門化、環境屬性、流暢體驗與場所依戀之關係研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報，10(1)，65-92。
   連結：
3. 曹勝雄、黃文雄(2016)。社會支持對遊憩專門化與場所依戀關係之調節效果。大專體育學刊，18(3)，147-162。
   連結：
4. 梁英文、曹勝雄(2007)。認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係：遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究，20(3)，1-24。
   連結：
5. 陳寬裕、歐典灝、歐人豪(2009)。認真休閒特質與幸福感之研究：兼論配偶支持的干擾效果。觀光休閒學報，15(2)，113-140。
   連結：
6. 趙芝良、陳瑋苓(2010)。建構爬蟲類寵物飼養者之認真性休閒職涯。戶外遊憩研究，23(4)，1-24。
   連結：
7. 歐雙磐、侯錦雄(2007)。登山者遊憩專門化與登山類型偏好。戶外遊憩研究，20(4)，51-74。
   連結：
8. Brown, C. A.(2007).The Carolina shaggers: Dance as serious leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,39(4),623-647.
9. Bryan, H.(1977).Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen.Journal of Leisure Research,9(3),174-187.
10. Cheng, E.,Stebbins, R.,Packer, J.(2017).Serious leisure among older gardeners in Australia.Leisure Studies,34(6),505-518.
11. Ewert, A.,Hollenhorst, S.(1989).Testing adventure model: Empirical support for a model of Risk recreation participation.Journal of Leisure Research,21(2),124-139.
12. Galloway, S.(2012).Recreation specialization among New Zealand river recreation users: A multiactivity study of motivation and site preference.Leisure Sciences,34(3),256-271.
13. Ingen, E. V.,Eijck, K. V.(2009).Leisure and social capital: Analysis of types of company and activities.Leisure Sciences,31(2),192-206.
14. Jun, J.,Kyle, G.,Graefe, A.,Manning, R.(2015).An identity-based conceptualization of recreation specialization.Journal of Leisure Research,47(4),425-443.
15. Kelly, J. R.(1983).Leisure identities and interactions.London:George Allen & Unwin.
16. Kuentzel, W.,Heberlein, T. A.(2006).From novice to expert? A panel study of specialization progression and change.Journal of Leisure Research,38(4),496-512.
17. Kuentzel, W.,Heberlein, T. A.(2008).Life course changes and competing leisure interests as obstacles to boating specialization.Leisure Sciences,30(2),143-157.
18. Lee, S.,Graefe, A.,Li, C.(2007).The effect of specialization and gender on motivations and preferences for site attributes in paddling.Leisure Sciences,29,355-373.
19. McFarlane, B. L.(2004).Recreation specialization and site choice among vehicle-based campers.Leisure Sciences,26(3),309-322.
20. Needham, M. D.,Scott, D.,Vaske, J. J.(2013).Recreation specialization and related concepts in leisure research.Leisure Sciences,35(3),199-202.
21. Oh, C-O.,Ditton, R. B.(2008).Using recreation specialization to understand conservation support.Journal of Leisure Research,40(4),556-573.
22. Oh, C-O.,Ditton, R. B.(2006).Using recreation specialization to understand multi-attribute management preference.Leisure Sciences,28(4),368-384.
23. Oh, C-O.,Lyu, S. O.,Hammitt, W. E.(2012).Predictive linkages between recreation specialization and place attachment.Journal of Leisure Research,44(1),70-87.
24. Oh, C-O.,Sorice, M. G.,Ditton, R. B.(2010).Exploring progression along the recreation specialization continuum using a latent growth approach.Leisure Sciences,33(1),15-31.
25. Oh, C-O.,Sutton, S. G.,Sorice, M. G.(2013).Assessing the role of recreation specialization in fishing site substitution.Leisure Sciences,35(3),256-272.
26. Ritchie, B. W.(1998).Bicycle tourism in the South Island of New Zealand: Planning and management issues.Tourism Management,19(6),567-582.
27. Schroeder, S. A.,Fulton, D. C.,Lawrence, J. S.,Cordts, S. D.(2013).Identity and specialization as a waterfowl hunter.Leisure Sciences,35(3),218-234.
28. Scott, D.(2012).Serious leisure and recreation specialization: An uneasy marriage.Leisure Sciences,34(4),366-371.
29. Scott, D.,Godbey, G.(1994).Recreation specialization in the social world of contract bridge.Journal of Leisure Research,26(3),275-295.
30. Scott, D.,Lee, J, H.(2010).Progression, stability, or decline? Sociological mechanisms underlying change in specialization among birdwatchers.Leisure Sciences,32(2),180-194.
31. Stebbins, R.(1992).Amateurs, professional, and serious leisure.Montreal, Canada:McGill- Queen's University Press.
32. Thapa, B.,Graefe, A. R.,Meyer, L. A.(2006).Specialization and marine based environmental behaviors among scuba divers.Journal of Leisure Research,38(4),601-615.
33. Tsaur, S-H.,Liang, Y-W.(2008).Serious leisure and recreation specialization.Leisure Sciences,30(4),325-341.
34. Waight, C. F.,Bath, A. J.(2014).Recreation specialization among ATV users and its relationship to environmental attitudes and management preferences on the island of Newfoundland.Leisure Sciences,36(2),161-182.
35. 王國川譯、翁千惠譯(2005)。質性資料分析─如何透視質性資料。臺北市:五南圖書。
36. 行政院體育委員會(2002)。臺灣地區自行車道系統規劃與設置。臺北市:作者。
37. 吳崇旗、巫昌陽、王偉琴(2012)。高屏地區郊山登山健行者遊憩專門化對其環境行為之影響。休閒事業研究，10(1)，59-71。
38. 簡煥杰(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園市，國立體育大學。

1. 陳美燕,李崑璋(2020)。認真性休閒量表中文化與驗證：水域活動為例。臺灣運動心理學報，20(1)，27-45。
2. 高俊雄,洪文仲,周宇輝(2022)。探究劍道運動認真休閒動機與馬斯洛人類需求階層。臺灣體育學術研究，72，95-117。
3. 林庭安,吳崇旗(2022)。業餘超級鐵人參與動機、投入歷程與感受之研究。臺灣體育學術研究，73，137-162。