體育課三構面教師自主支持量表中文化與信效度檢驗

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Multidimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Physical Education

10.6547/tassm.202312_23(2).0007

吳伯龍(Bo-Long Wu)；潘敏(Min Pan)；林國華(Kuo-Hwa Lin)；徐偉庭(Wei-Ting Hsu)

自我決定理論 ； 自主支持 ； 體育課學生 ； self-determination theory ； autonomy support ； PE students

臺灣體育運動管理學報

23卷2期（2023 / 12 / 01）

357 - 384

繁體中文;英文

目的：教師自主支持是提升學生內在動機的重要條件，教師的何種行為能有效提高體育課學生的自主動機是教育學者與實務工作者所關注的議題。然而，過去的教師自主支持測量工具僅能檢測認知自主支持，而實際上教師自主支持應包含認知、程序與組織自主支持，目前國外已有以此概念為架構發展出的體育課三構面教師自主支持量表（MD-PASS-PE），但尚未有中文版本之量表。故本研究將對MD-PASS-PE進行中文化，並驗證中文版量表之信效度。方法：本研究分成三階段進行，階段一進行中文量表之專家效度檢驗；階段二則以346名國高中生（平均年齡14.94 ± 1.42）為對象，進行初步的量表模型檢驗；階段三以另外291名國高中生（平均年齡15.66±1.46）為對象，進行量表的恆等性與效標關聯效度檢驗。結果：中文版的MD-PASS-PE在各種信效度驗證中皆取得良好的結果。學生在體育課中的知覺自主支持、基本心理需求滿足與努力之間為正相關。結論：中文化MD-PASS-PE具有理想的信度與效度，可用於量測學生對於教師自主支持行為的感受，未來教師可根據量表檢驗之結果，設計具體的教學策略，以增進學生自主動機及營造正向課堂體驗；未來研究則可針對此量表進行複核效度檢驗，亦可檢驗此量表於不同年齡或是不同情境的適用性。創新性：1.提供測量教師自主支持的新工具。2.跳脫過往以單構面對教師自主支持行為進行分析的方式。

Purpose: Teacher autonomy support is a key element in enhancing intrinsic motivation in students. This topic has increasingly received attention from both educational scholars and practitioners. In physical education, teachers' behaviors play a key role in enhancing the autonomous motivation of students. Nevertheless, the majority of tools that are currently available for measuring autonomy support are capable of evaluating only cognitive autonomy support. Given that teacher autonomy support encompasses cognitive, procedural, and organizational aspects, the Multidimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Physical Education (MD-PASS-PE) was developed. This instrument has not been translated into Chinese. Therefore, the present study translated the MD-PASS-PE into Chinese and investigated its reliability and validity. Methods: This study was conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, the expert validity of the Chinese MD-PASS-PE was established. In Phase 2, the Chinese MD-PASS-PE was evaluated with a sample of 346 middle-school and high-school students (M_(age) = 14.94, SD_(age) = 1.42). In Phase 3, the measurement equivalence and criterion-related validity of the Chinese MD-PASS-PE were analyzed with a sample of 291 middle-school and high-school students (M_(age) = 15.66, SD_(age) = 1.46). Results: After its expert validity, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity were established and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, the Chinese MD-PASS-PE was deemed fit and to have measurement invariance across different samples. Positive correlations were observed between the students' perceived autonomy support, basic psychological requirements, and efforts. Conclusions: The Chinese MD-PASS-PE is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to measure students' perceptions of teachers' autonomy-supporting behaviors. This scale can also serve as a reference for developing autonomy-supporting teaching strategies. In future studies, cross-validation of the Chinese MD-PASS-PE should be considered for different ages or contexts. Originality/value: 1.A Chinese version of an established scale was developed to measure perceived autonomy support. 2.Multidimensional analysis was conducted to identify teachers' autonomy-supporting behaviors.

1. 尚憶薇, I.-S.,徐偉庭, W.-T.(2022)。學生設計遊戲模式之應用與研究展望。中華體育季刊，36(2)，109-116。
   連結：
2. 徐偉庭, W.-T.,周宏室, H.-S.,潘義祥, Y.-H.(2014)。以自我決定理論為架構檢驗體育課學生的責任行為。體育學報，47(3)，425-436。
   連結：
3. 陳志忠, C.-C.(2013)。專科女學生體育課基本心理需求對知覺自主性支持預測主觀活力之中介效果。臺灣運動教育學報，8(2)，33-50。
   連結：
4. 陳履賢, L.-H.,林靜萍(2021)。體育課師生權力互動─以微觀政治觀點探討。中華體育季刊，35(4)，209-216。
   連結：
5. 鍾伯光, P.-K.(2010)。自我決定理論在教練工作上的應用。運動教練科學，20，1-9。
   連結：
6. 蘇美如, M.-Z.,黃英哲, Y.-C.(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係－應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，33-50。
   連結：
7. Assor, A.,Feinberg, O.,Kanat-Maymon, Y.,Kaplan, H.(2018).Reducing violence in non-controlling ways: A change program based on self-determination theory.The Journal of Experimental Education,86(2),195-213.
8. Assor, A.,Kaplan, H.,Roth, G.(2002).Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork.British Journal of Educational Psychology,72(2),261-278.
9. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
10. Bollen, K. A.(Ed.),Long, J. S.(Ed.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Sage.
11. Burgueño, R.,Macarro-Moreno, J.,Medina-Casaubón, J.(2020).Psychometry of The multidimensional perceived autonomy support scale in physical education with Spanish secondary school students.Sage Open,10(1),2158244019901253.
12. Chen, B.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Beyers, W.,Boone, L.,Deci, E. L.,Van der Kaap-Deeder, J.,Duriez, B.,Lens, W.,Matos, L.,Mouratidis, A.,Ryan, R. M.,Sheldon, K. M.,Soenens, B.,Van Petegem, S.,Verstuyf, J.(2015).Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures.Motivation and Emotion,39(2),216-236.
13. Cox, A.,Williams, L.(2008).The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,30(2),222-239.
14. Cuevas-Campos, R.,Fernández-Bustos, J. G.,González-Cutre, D.,Hernández-Martínez, A.(2020).Need satisfaction and need thwarting in physical education and intention to be physically active.Sustainability,12(18),7312.
15. Deci, E. L. (2001). The sport climate questionnaire. Retrieved April 1, 2023 from https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/sport-climate-questionnaire/
16. Deci, E. L.(1975).Intrinsic motivation.Plenum.
17. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour.Plenum.
18. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2000).The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry,11(4),227-268.
19. Fisher, C. D.(1978).The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,21(3),273-288.
20. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),382-388.
21. Hagger, M. S.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.,Barkoukis, V.,Wang, C. K. J.,Baranowski, J. C.(2005).Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(3),376-390.
22. Hagger, M. S.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.,Hein, V.,Pihu, M.,Soós, I.,Karsai, I.(2007).The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,8(5),632-653.
23. Hein, V.,Caune, A.(2014).Relationships between perceived teacher’s autonomy support, effort and physical self-esteem.Kinesiology,46(2),218-226.
24. Hoyle, R. H.,Panter, A. T.(1995).Writing about structural equation models.Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications
25. Hsu, W.,Pan, Y.,Chou, H.,Lee, W.,Lu, J. H. F.(2014).Measuring students’ responsibility in physical education: Instrument development and validation.International Journal of Sport Psychology,45(5),487-503.
26. Hu, L. T.,Bentler, P. M.(1998).Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453.
27. Jang, H.(2008).Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity.Journal of Educational Psychology,100,798-811.
28. Jang, H.,Kim, E. J.,Reeve, J.(2016).Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model.Learning and Instruction,43,27-38.
29. Jang, H.,Reeve, J.,Halusic, M.(2016).A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students’ preferred ways.The Journal of Experimental Education,84(4),686-701.
30. Jankauskiene, R.,Urmanavicius, D.,Baceviciene, M.(2022).Association between motivation in physical education and positive body image: Mediating and moderating effects of physical activity habits.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,20(1),464.
31. Kalajas-Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Koka, A.,Tilga, H.,Raudsepp, L.,Hagger, M. S.(2022).Application of the trans-contextual model to predict change in leisure time physical activity.Psychology & Health,37(1),62-86.
32. Kaplan, H.(2018).Teachers’ autonomy support, autonomy suppression and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students.Social Psychology of Education,21(1),223-255.
33. Kaplan, H.,Assor, A.(2012).Enhancing autonomy-supportive I-Thou dialogue in schools: Conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program.Social Psychology of Education,15(2),251-269.
34. Kaplan, H.,Assor, A.,El-Sayed, H.,Kanat-Maymon, Y.(2014).The unique contribution of autonomy support and autonomy frustration to predicting an optimal learning experience in Bedouin students: Testing self-determination theory in a collectivistic society.Dapim Journal for Studies and Research in Education,58,41-77.
35. Koka, A.,Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Kalajas-Tilga, H.,Raudsepp, L.(2021).A multidimensional approach to perceived teachers’ autonomy support and its relationship with intrinsic motivation of students in physical education.International Journal of Sport Psychology,52(3),266-286.
36. Koka, A.,Tilga, H.,Kalajas-Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Raudsepp, L.(2020).Detrimental effect of perceived controlling behavior from physical education teachers on students’ leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: An application of the trans-contextual model.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(16),5939.
37. Leo, F. M.,Mouratidis, A.,Pulido, J. J.,López-Gajardo, M. A.,Sánchez-Oliva, D.(2022).Perceived teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in physical education: The mediating role of basic psychological needs and self-determined motivation.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,27(1),59-76.
38. Li, C.,Wang, C. J.,Kee, Y. H.(2013).Burnout and its relations with basic psychological needs and motivation among athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,14(5),692-700.
39. Maldonado, E.,Zamarripa, J.,Ruiz-Juan, F.,Pacheco, R.,Delgado, M.(2019).Teacher autonomy support in physical education classes as a predictor of motivation and concentration in Mexican students.Frontiers in Psychology,10,2834.
40. Ntoumanis, N.(2005).A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(3),444-453.
41. Ntoumanis, N.(2001).A self‐determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71(2),225-242.
42. Reeve, J.(2009).Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive.Educational Psychologist,44(3),159-175.
43. Reeve, J.,Jang, H.(2006).What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),209-218.
44. Reeve, J.,Jang, H.,Carrell, D.,Jeon, S.,Barch, J.(2004).Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support.Motivation and Emotion,28(2),147-169.
45. Ryan, R. M.(1982).Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43(3),450-461.
46. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2017).Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness.Guilford Press.
47. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(1),97-110.
48. Stefanou, C. R.,Perencevich, K. C.,DiCintio, M.,Turner J. C.(2004).Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership.Educational Psychologist,39(2),97-110.
49. Sun, H.,Li, W.,Shen, B.(2017).Learning in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,36(3),277-291.
50. Taylor, I. M.,Lonsdale, C.(2010).Cultural differences in the relationships among autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality, and effort in British and Chinese physical education.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,32(5),655-673.
51. Taylor, I. M.,Ntoumanis, N.,Standage, M.,Spray, C. M.(2010).Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,32(1),99-120.
52. Teixeira, D. S.,Marques, M.,Palmeira, A. L.(2018).Associations between affect, basic psychological needs and motivation in physical activity contexts: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del ejercicio y el deporte,13(2),225-233.
53. Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Koka, A.(2017).Measuring the perception of the teachers’ autonomy-supportive behavior in physical education: Development and initial validation of a multi-dimensional instrument.Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,21(4),244-255.
54. Tilga, H.,Kalajas-Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Raudsepp, L.,Koka, A.(2020).How does received autonomy-supportive and controlling behavior in physical education related to adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity participation?.Kinesiology,52(2),265-272.
55. Tilga, H.,Kalajas-Tilga, H.,Hein, V.,Raudsepp, L.,Koka, A.(2021).Perceived autonomy support from peers, parents, and physical education teachers as predictors of physical activity and health-related quality of life among adolescents-a one-year longitudinal study.Education Sciences,11(9),457.
56. Vallerand, R. J.(1997).Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.Advances in experimental social psychology,29,271-360.
57. Vandenberg, R. J.,Lance, C. E.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,3(1),4-70.
58. Vasconcellos, D.,Parker, P. D.,Hilland, T.,Cinelli, R.,Owen, K. B.,Kapsal, N.,Lee, J.,Antczak, D.,Ntoumanis, N.,Ryan, R. M.,Lonsdale, C.(2020).Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,112(7),1444-1469.
59. Vlachopoulos, S. P.,Katartzi, E. S.,Kontou, M. G.(2011).The basic psychological needs in physical education scale.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,30(3),263-280.
60. Waaler, R.,Halvari, H.,Skjesol, K.,Bagøien, T. E.(2013).Autonomy support and intrinsic goal progress expectancy and its links to longitudinal study effort and subjective wellbeing: The differential mediating effect of intrinsic and identified regulations and the moderator effects of effort and intrinsic goals.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,57(3),325-341.
61. Williams, G. C.,Deci, E. L.(1996).Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory.Journal of Personal and Social Psychology,70(4),767-779.
62. Zhang, T.,Solmon, M. A.,Kosma, M.,Carson, R. L.,Gu, X.(2011).Need support, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity participation among middle school students.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,30(1),51-68.
63. Zimmermann, J.,Tilga, H.,Bachner, J.,Demetriou, Y.(2020).The German multi-dimensional perceived autonomy support scale for physical education: Adaption and validation in a sample of lower track secondary school students.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(19),7353.
64. Zimmermann, J.,Tilga, H.,Bachner, J.,Demetriou, Y.(2021).The effect of teacher autonomy support on leisure-time physical activity via cognitive appraisals and achievement emotions: A mediation analysis based on the control-value theory.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(8),3987.