题名

垃圾焚化廠跨縣市營運管理之研究-以臺北市及基隆市爲例

并列篇名

The Inter-counties/Cities Management of Incinerators-with a Case Study of Taipei Municipality and Keeling City

DOI

10.7110/HKGJ.200506.0001

作者

程仁宏(Jen-Hung Cheng)

关键词

環境識覺 ; 營運管理 ; 焚化政策 ; Environmental Perception ; Operations Administration ; Incinerating Policy

期刊名称

華岡地理學報

卷期/出版年月

18期(2005 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 17

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣地區由於地狹人稠,隨著經濟成長,國民所得增加,廢棄物處理的議題,由以往垃圾流落街頭到環保署推動『一縣市一焚化爐』政策,然近年由於環保意識的擡頭,要求停止繼續興建垃圾焚化廠的聲浪不斷,顯示環保署焚化政策,有重新檢討的必要;時值臺北市與基隆市進行垃圾處理互助案,實証案例之分析,將有助日後各縣市如何跨區域合作處理垃圾,更有益於垃圾焚化廠在營運管理與居民互動模式之參考。

英文摘要

Due to the densely populated, the economic growth, and the increasing per capita income in Taiwan, the management of the wastes has become a significant topic of public affairs. Consequently, the EPA (Environmental Protection Authority) proposed a policy of ”one county/city one incinerator” for the solution of the waste problems. However, the rising of the environmental protection consciousness among the environmentists as well as the common citizens in recent years resulted in the increasing voice against the continentcing construction of incinerator, indicating that the EPA's incinerator policy has to be re-evaluated. At the time when the cooperation of managing wastes between Taipei municipality and Keeling city is going to start, this research will be helpful as a reference to the cross-regain cooperation of managing the wastes, especially to the interaction between the management of incinerator and the local residents.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. Cerrell, Associates, Inc.(1984).Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting.Los Angeles:California Waste Management Board.
  2. Dunlap, F. P.,Snow, R.(1990).The New Environmental Paradigm and Further Analysis.Journal of Environment Education,21,20-26.
  3. Fischhoff, B.,P. Slovie,S. Lichtenstein,Covello, V,G. Flanun,J. Rodericks,R. Tardiff (Eds.)(1983).Analysis of Actual and Perceived Risks.New York:Plenum.
  4. Gamba, R. J.,Oskamp S.(1994).Factors Influencing Community Residents' Participation in Commingled Curbside Recycling Program.Journal of Environment and Behavior,26,587-612.
  5. Groothuis, P. A.,G. Miller(1994).Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities: The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs.American Journal of Economics and Sociology,53(3),335-346.
  6. Konheim, C. S.(1986).Reconciling Local Opposition to a Resource Recovery Plant.New Jersey Bell Journal,9,45-55.
  7. Kunreuther, H.(1993).Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo.Risk Analysis,13,301-318.
  8. Lake, R. W.(1993).Planners Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY.Journal of the American Planning Association,59,87-93.
  9. Lee, Y. J.,R. De Young,R W. Marans(1995).Factors Influencing Individul Eecycling Behavior in Office Settings: A Study of Office Workers in Taiwan.Environment and Bshavior,27(3),338-403.
  10. Mitchell, R. C.,R. T. Carson(1980).An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvement.draft report prepared for the US. Environmental Protection Agency.
  11. Morell, D.(1984).Siting and the Politics of Equity.Hazardous Waste,1,555-571.
  12. Scott, D.,Willits, F. K.(1994).Environmental Attitudes and Behavior: A Pennsylvania Survey.Environment and Behavior,26(2),239-260.
  13. Simth, V. Kerry,William H. Desvousges(1986).The Value of Avoiding a LULU: Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites.The Review of Economics Statistics,68,293-299.
  14. Slovic, P., B,Fischhoff, B.,S. Lichtenstein(1979).Rating the Risks.Environment,21,14-20,36-39.
  15. Van Liere, K.D.,Dunlap, R.E.(1980).The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Enpirical Evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly,40,25-38.
  16. Walsh, E.,R. Warland,D. C. Smith(1980).Backyards, NIMBYs, and Incinerator Siting: Implications for Social Movement Theory.Social Problems,40,25-38.
  17. Whyte, A. V. (ed.)(1980).Environmental Risk Assessment.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Wilson, A. R.(1991).Environmental Risk: Identification and Management.Lewis Publishers Inc..
  19. 何紀芳(1995)。國立政治大學地政研究所。
  20. 李永展(1996)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響-以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠爲例。國立政治大學學報,72,263-297。
  21. 李永展、翁久惠(1995)。鄰避設施對主觀環境生活品質影響之探討-以居民對垃圾焚化廠之認知與態度爲例。經社法制論叢,16,89-118。
  22. 陳建甫(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學農業推廣研究所。
  23. 劉錦添(1989)。污染性設施設置程式之研究。台北:行政院經建會法規小組。
  24. 劉錦添(1992)。台灣地區民眾對環境風險的認知與面臨環境風險下的行爲分析-台北及高雄地區。台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。