地震災害經驗與調適行為之比較研究－以台南縣白河、台中縣東勢居民為例

The Residents' Experience and Behavior of the Earthquake Hazard: A Comparative Study in Paiho and Tungshih

10.7110/HKGJ.200806.0052

曹建宇(Chien-Yu Tsao)；張長義(Chang-Yi Chang)

行爲 ； 識覺 ； 地震災害 ； 白河 ； 東勢 ； Behavior ； Perception ； Earthquake hazard ； Paiho ； Tungshih.

華岡地理學報

21期（2008 / 06 / 01）

52 - 75

繁體中文

台灣位處於環太平洋地震帶，時常發生重大的地震事件，也造成嚴重的傷亡和財產損失。面對未來不斷的地震威脅，如何有效降低地震所造成的災害，讓台灣民眾能正確認識地震，並且具備防災應變能力，是非常重要且急迫。研究指出，居民的防災、減災及應變能力會隨著災害規模、次數和受災經驗而增加，但我們無法也不可能提供居民受災經驗以提高防災能力。本文主要探討台灣地區在經歷1999年921集集大地震之後，居民的防災能力。以高度潛在地震受災區的台南縣白河居民爲研究對象，並以台中縣東勢災區居民做比較研究，了解居民對於地震災害的識覺、態度、防災調適行爲以及影響行爲的機制，提升居民災害調適能力。 研究結果發現，地理環境的差異造成受災經驗的不同，會影響行爲調適，空間的差異造成經驗上的不同，影響個人的識覺、態度與行爲；個人特性的不同對調適行爲會有不同程度的影響；居民調適行爲與防災應變和地震相關知識有顯著的相關性，居民對地震災害風險的識覺程度高則防災調適行爲愈積極。本文從民眾角度去思考與看待現有的防災問題，期能做爲環境資源管理與防災政策參考。

Taiwan has been suffering many serious earthquake hazards. It causes heavy casualties and property loss. It is necessary to urge residents in earthquake hazard prone area to bear the response ability. Many previous research works have indicated that the residents' ability of precaution to hazard is highly correlated with the experience of hazard. This study is attempt to examine the residents’ ability of precaution to hazard after the Chi-chi earthquake on September 21, 1999 in Tungshih, Taichung and Paiho, Tainan. A comparative study between Tungshih and Paiho has been investigated different residents' perception, attitude and behavior of the earthquake hazard. The research results have indicated that the residents' ability of precaution to hazard is correlated with the experience of hazard, perception of hazard, attitude of hazard and residents' characteristics. The residents' characteristics include gender, age, occupation, the form of family and the length of residence. This study hopes to provide the valuable information to the government's policies of precaution to the environmental hazards.

1. 陳錦鴻、張長義劉英毓(2006)。原住民部落居民對民宿業發展衝撀的環境識覺差異分析－以司馬庫斯、新光部落爲例。華岡地理學報，19，85-110。
   連結：
2. 葉秀珍、陳昭榮(2007)。災害風險管理與其因應制度的探討。台灣社會福利學刊，6(1)，51-92。
   連結：
3. Adger, W. N.(2006).Vulnerability.Global Environmental Change,16,268-281.
4. Alexander, D.(1993).Natural Disasters.New York:Chapman and Hall.
5. Barnett, J.,G. M. Breakwell(2001).Risk Perception and Experience: Hazard Personality Profiles and Individual Differences.Risk Analysis,21(1),171-177.
6. Chang, C. Y.(2006).Vulnerability Analysis of Environment Change in the Aboriginal Area-A Case Study of Jian-Shin Township, Hsin-Chu County Taiwan.Sustainable Technology and Policy Conference,Taipei:
7. Chang, C. Y.,K. H. Lin(2006).Island Vulnerability and Sustainable Development-Taiwan Experience.ISISA Conference Island of the World IX. Sustainable Island-Sustainable Strategies,Kahului Maui Hawaii:
8. Cutter, S. L.(2003).The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,93(1),1-12.
9. Cutter, S. L.,J. T. Mitchell,M. S. Scott(2000).Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Place: a Case Study of Geogretown county, South Carolina.Annals of Association of American Geographers,90(4),713-737.
10. Dooley, D.,R. Catalano,S. Mishra,S. Serxner(1992).Earthquake Preparedness: Predictors in a Community Survey.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,22,451-470.
11. Downs, R. M.(1970).Geographic Space Perception: Past Approaches and Future Prospects.Progress in Geography,2,65-108.
12. What to Do before an Earthquake
13. Goltedge, R. G.,Stinson, R. J.(1987).Analytical Behavioural Geography.New York:Croom Helm.
14. Gregg, C. E.,B. F. Houghton,D. M. Johnston,D. Paton,D. A. Swanson(2004).The Perception of Volcanic Risk in Kona Communities from Mauna Loa and Hualalai Volcanoes, Hawii.Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,130,179-196.
15. Hewitt, K.(1997).Regiois of Risk: A georaphical Introduction to Disasters.London:Longman.
16. Jackson, E.L.(1981).Response to Earthquake Hazard: The West Coast of North America.Environment and Behavior,13,387-416.
17. Jackson, E.L.(1977).Public Response to Earthquake Hazard.California Geology,30,278-280.
18. Jackson, E.L.,T. Mukerjee,White, C. E. (ed.)(1974).Natural Hazard: Local, National, Global.New York:Oxford University press.
19. Kasperson, R. E.,K. Dow,Caning, T.,R. G Golledge (ed.)(1993).Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
20. Lindell, M. K.,D. J. Whitney(2000).Correlates of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption.Risk Analysis,20(1),13-25.
21. Lindell, M. K.,R. W. Perry(1992).Behavioral Foundations of Community Emergency Planning.Washington, DC:Hemisphere Press.
22. Lindell, M. K.,R. W. Perry(2000).Household adjustment to Earthquake Hazard: a Review of Research.Environment and Behavior,32(4),461-501.
23. Linedell, M. K.,C. S. Prater(2002).Risk Area Residents' Perceptions and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,32(11),2377-2392.
24. Mitchell, B.(1989).Geography and Resource Analysis.London:Longman.
25. Russell, L.,J. D. Colts,L. B. Bourque(1995).Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Actions Before and After Two Earthquakes.Environment and Behavior,27,744-770.
26. White, G. F.(1942).Human Adjustment to Flood: A Geographical Approach to the Flood Problem in the United States.University of Chicago Geography Research Paper,29
27. White, G.F. (ed.)(1974).Natural Hazard: Local, National, Global.New York:Oxford University press.
28. 災害地震彙整
29. 王志弘譯、Cloke, P.、P. Crang、M. Goodwin原著(2006)。人文地理學概論。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
30. 王琳、白璐(1993)。行政院國家科學委員會防災科技研究報告79-75號行政院國家科學委員會防災科技研究報告79-75號,未出版
31. 林冠慧(2004)。全球變遷下脆弱性與適應性研究方法與方法論探討。全球變遷通訊雜誌，43，33-38。
32. 林冠慧、張長義(2006)。巨大災害後的脆弱性台灣集集地震後中部地區土地利用與覆蓋變遷。地球科學進展，21(2)，201-210。
33. 柯于璋(2005)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
34. 台灣活斷層查詢系統
35. 張長義(1985)。國立臺灣大學地理學系研究報告國立臺灣大學地理學系研究報告,未出版
36. 張長義(1977)。環境誡覺與自然災害之研究。中國地理學會會刊，5，57-60。
37. 楊冠政(1992)。環境行爲相關變項之類別與組識。環境教育，15，10-24。
38. 楊雲龍(1997)。關陽平原水災災害識覺之研究。新竹師院學報，10，287-323。
39. 蕭江碧(1999)。九二一集集地震全面勘災報告；車建築物震害調查九二一集集地震全面勘災報告；車建築物震害調查,臺北:國家地震工程研究中心。

1. 許惠媛(2012)。921地震：醫療服務人員災害韌性之研究∼以中部地區某醫院為例。中山醫學大學醫學社會暨社會工作學系碩士班學位論文。2012。1-73。