地方治理與制度厚實－古坑華山社區之個案

Local Governance and Institutional Thickness-The Case Study of Hua-Shan Community

10.7110/HKGJ.201006.0053

廖哲強(Zhe-Qiang Liao)；蕭崑杉(Kun-Sun Shiao)；郭大玄(Da-Xuan Guo)

地方治理 ； 制度厚實 ； 華山 ； 咖啡 ； local governance ； institutional thickness ； Hua-Shan Community ； coffee

華岡地理學報

25期（2010 / 06 / 01）

53 - 66

繁體中文

本研究從地方治理的角度，檢視華山社區災後重建過程中，國家、地方政府、社區三者關係，並更為細緻地從制度厚實(institutional thickness)概念，探究華山社區咖啡產業盛行之原因。研究發現：（一）台灣地方治理與西方地方治理最大不同在於「國家」的角色，前者有賴中央資金援助、後者則源於後福特主義危機，藉由權力下放以解決政府財政問題。（二）制度是治理過程中的產物，並有其地域性。華山社區的制度發展乃鑲嵌於特定地域社會所產生，從而厚實咖啡產業發展，卻也產生制度鎖死現象，阻礙產業發展。最後，研究建議政府進行社區發展工作時，應有統籌的專責單位，避免人力與資金上的浪費，造成地方派系產生之可能。

This paper aims to explore the relations among nation, local government and community in the process of post-disaster rebuilding process from the perspective of local governance. It also aims to further examine the reasons for the flourishing of the coffee industry in Hua-shan Community based on institutional thickness. Research results show that (1) the greatest difference of local governance in Taiwan and in the west lies in the role of the state. While the former relies on capital support from the central government, the latter originates from post-Fordist crises and resolves financial problems through the decentralization of governing power. (2) Institution is an outcome of the governing process and has its own locality. The Institutional development of Hua-shan Community is embedded in its locality, which helps thicken the development of its coffee industry. Nevertheless, an institutional lock-in is also in place, stopping the sector from developing further. Finally, research suggests that the government should have an organizing committee to take charge of community development work, so as to avoid the waste of human resource and capital, which may result in the formation of local factions.

1. 邵佩君(2003)。台灣集集震災後社區營造式重建機制之探討—以軍功里和劉家伙房之重建為例。都市與計劃，371-389。
   連結：
2. 張春興(2002)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
   連結：
3. 楊友仁(2004)。經濟地理學的制度轉向：一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議。國立台灣大學城鄉與建築研究學報，12，69-80。
   連結：
4. 廖石(2003)。從「地方治理」的思潮變遷探討「社區賦權」在鄉村發展政策中的定位與課題。城市與設計學報，15/16，93-115。
   連結：
5. 華山社區發展協會(2010)，華山社區發展協會現行工作內容，http://huashanwu.blogspot.com/，下載日期：[2010.1.20]。
6. Amin, A.(2001).Moving on: institutionalism in economy geography.Environment and Planning A,33,1237-1241.
7. Amin, A.(ed.),Thrift, N. J.(ed.)(1994).Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Chiffoleau, Y.(2009).From politics to cooperation: The dynamics of embeddedness in alternative food supply chains.Sociologia Ruralis,49(3),219-235.
9. Dearden, P.,Bennett, M.,Johnston, J.(2005).Trends in global protected area governance(1992-2002).Environment Management,36(1),89-100.
10. Fonte, M.(2008).Knowledge, Food and Place.A way of Producing, a Way of Knowledge.Sociologia Ruralis,48,200-222.
11. Jarosz, L.(2008).The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas.Journal of Rural Studies,24,231-244.
12. Jessop, B.(1995).The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change?.Economic and Society,24,307-333.
13. Jessop, B.(2001).Institutional returns and the strategic-relational approach.Environment and Planning A,33,1213-1235.
14. Light, D. W.(2001).Comparative institutional response in the United Kingdom.Social Science and Medicine,52,1151-1166.
15. MacKinnon, D.(2000).Managerialism, governmentality and the state: A Neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance.Political Geography,19,293-314.
16. Marsden, T.(1998).New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural space.Journal of Rural Studies,14,107-117.
17. Maye, D.(ed.)(2007).Alternative food geographies.Oxford:Elsevier.
18. Rhodes, R. A. W.(1996).The new governance: governing without government.Political Studies,44,652-667.
19. Sheppard, E.(ed.),Barnes, T. J.(ed.)(2003).A Companion to Economic Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
20. Stringer, C.,Heron, R. L.(2008).Agri-Food Commodity Chains and Globalising Networks.Ashgate.
21. Whatmore, D.,Stassart, P.,Renting, H.(2003).What is alternative about alternative food networks?.Environment and Planning A,35,389-391.
22. Wood, A.,Valler, D.(2001).Turn again? Rethinking institutions and the governance of local and regional economies.Environment and Planning A,33,1139-1144.
23. Woods, M.(2005).Rural Geography.London:Sage.
24. 白美女(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所。
25. 林文賜、羅健霖、廖紹安(2008)。土石災害集水區之環境敏感區位分析—以雲林古坑華山地區為例。水保技術，3(2)，95-104。
26. 林威逸(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學觀光學系。
27. 林彥辰(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學地理研究所。
28. 夏鑄九(2007)。做為社會動力的社區與城市：全球化下對社區營造的一點理論上的思考。台灣社會研究季刊，65，227-247。
29. 黃躍雯(2008)。雲林古坑華山地區以咖啡帶動地方觀光發展的轉型經驗。生物與休閒事業研究，6(1)，41-62。
30. 廖哲強(2007)。文化產業與地方文化產業芻議。北縣文化季刊，95，97-101。

1. 黃獻緯(2020)。異質精品化：國際評鑑準則與魚池咖啡在地技術。中國地理學會會刊，65，1-15。
2. 蕭崑杉、廖哲強(2011)。另類食物在地知識形塑歷程－古坑咖啡之個案。中國地理學會會刊，46，19-36。
3. 楊凱成(2013)。台灣糖業文化資產保存與活化的人力資本治理。科技博物，17(2)，45-66。