题名

資本主義都市的空間生產考察-台中市豐樂重劃區為例

并列篇名

Spatial Production in a Capitalist City: Fengle Land Readjustment Area in Taichung

DOI

10.7110/HKGJ.201206.0041

作者

莊翰華(Han-Hwa Juang);蔡國士(Kuo-Shih Tsai);曾宇良(Yu-Liang Tseng);李建平(Chien-Ping Lee)

关键词

市地重劃 ; 空間生產 ; 資本積累 ; 烏托邦 ; Land readjustment ; Spatial production ; Capital accumulation ; Utopia ideal

期刊名称

華岡地理學報

卷期/出版年月

29期(2012 / 06 / 01)

页次

41 - 52

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究從都市政策的脈絡檢視豐樂重劃區的空間生產過程,藉由人口、建成區和土地與房地產開發相關資料,剖析台中市豐樂重劃區的發展過程,對政府官員、地主和建設公司主管共15位的深度訪談,探討豐樂重劃區的空間生產過程所蘊含的烏托邦願景,資本如何透過空間的生產擴大積累。結果顯示:豐樂重劃區空間生產過程中,規劃者雖賦予提供高品質居住空間願景,試圖推廣較為公平正義的開發方式;在各種空間資本追求擴大其資本積累的經濟邏輯下,豐樂重劃區變成一個越趨排除窮人的空間,追求公平制度變成對大地主和財團的保障。

英文摘要

This paper discusses the production of Fengle land readjustment area through the context of urban policy in the first. Then retracing the Fengle land readjustment area's developing process by the data of population, built-up area and estate development. Finally, through the depth-interview, discussing the Utopian ideal which is contained in the production of space in Fengle land readjustment area and how to accumulating capital by production of space. We found that, during the production in Fengle land readjustment area, planners provide an ideal of promoting living quality and attempt to develop more fairly. Nevertheless, under the economic logic of spatial capital pursuing more accumulation of capital, Fengle land readjustment area becomes a space which excludes the poor gradually, and pursuing fair system becomes a guarantee to landowners and syndicates.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. Fainstein, S. S.(1993).The City Builders.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  2. Harvey, D.(1985).Consciousness and the urban experience.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  3. Healey, P.,Barrett, S. M.(1990).Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research.Urban Studies,27(1),89-104.
  4. Jaret, C.(1983).Recent Neo-Marxist Urban Analysis.Annual Review of Sociology,9,499-525.
  5. Logan, J.L.,Molotch, H.L.(1987).Urban Fortune.Berkeley:University of California.
  6. Smith, N.(1979).Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People.Journal of the American Planning Association,45(4),538-48.
  7. 台中市政府都市發展局都市計畫課(2007)。台中市都市計畫年報。台中:台中市政府。
  8. 周素卿(1995)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北:國科會。
  9. 郭奇正(2000)。城市行銷與創造性破壞下的投機城市營造:以台中市的都市發展為例。東海學報,41,43-64。
  10. 湯國榮(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中,逢甲大學都市計畫系。
被引用次数
  1. 顏誌君,楊友仁(2023)。市地重劃、壟斷權力與共識製造:臺中自辦市地重劃的案例。地理學報,105,3-63。
  2. (2023)。市地重劃與非正式土地金融網絡:臺中自辦重劃的預售抵費地案例。臺灣社會學刊,74,1-58。