大專院校學生核心能力發展之探析

The Analysis of College Student's Core Competences

10.6736/JPSR.201309_10(2).0001

楊玉惠(Yu-Huei Yang)

共通職能 ； 核心能力 ； common competences ； core competences

績效與策略研究

10卷2期（2013 / 09 / 01）

1 - 36

繁體中文

教育在於培育學生的格局與能力，本研究從國內外文獻歸納大專校院學生核心能力的內涵趨勢，並透過焦點座談彙整跨領域產業專家意見，對職場1～3年工作者職場所需具備之核心能力之觀點，而後進行不同就業途徑之在職人士問卷調查，進行信效度驗證及因素結構分析，研究得出大專校院學生所需共通職能，分別為溝通表達、持續學習、人際互動、團隊合作、問題解決、創新、工作責任及紀律、資訊科技應用，及52題題目向度，題項常用性的組內一致性（rwg）介於.861至.922，重要性的組內一致性（rwg）介於.858至.907，顯示題目評估的一致性相當高，共識度理想，並結合教育目標分類，作為學習者未來核心能力養成及學校端教學之作法建議。

The purpose of education is aimed to cultivate student's ability and manner; both are importance for the competence formulation. The study starts from the literature reviewing to analyze the mega trends in the transforming contents regarding college student's core competences. And then this study collects the opinions of different industrial professionals the through panels (workshops), which focus on the core working competences being needed for new recruits. Following the outcome of panel discussion, we try to certificate the credibility and reliability of the assumed competences by surveying these on-board professionals in different job tracks. By the certification and the analysis of constructive issues, this study finds that, firstly, the needed common competences for college students could be classified into eight dimensions: communication and expression, continuing learning, interpersonal relationship、team-working cooperation、problem solving, innovation、responsibility and discipline for work、IT application. Secondly, the figures of rwg (within-group inter-rater reliability) of these fifty two questions for surveying the eight common competences are quite high; the figure is between 0.861 to 0.922 for the dimension and usability, and 0.861 to 0.922 for the importance. Therefore, this study concludes that these eight common competences, being with high degree of consensus and being in accordance within education goals, should be guiding suggestion for students in evaluating the abilities development and for teachers in arranging the lecturing contents and delivery methods.

1. 符碧真(2007)。國立台灣大學教學發展中心，2007 年5 月2 日學習策略工作坊。2012 年9 月5 日，取自http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/ls/learninggate/lecture.php?index=21
2. European Union (2008). Bologna Process. Retrieved 20 June 2012 from http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc1290_en.htm
3. 行政院勞委會職訓局共通核心職能課程網(2004)。共通核心職能課程介紹。2012 年9 月3 日，取自http://ihrip.evta.gov.tw/CourseExplanation.3cs?one=query
4. 行政院勞委會職訓局共通核心職能課程網(2009)。共通核心職能課程介紹。20012 年9 月3 日，取自http://ihrip.evta.gov.tw/CourseExplanation.3cs?one=query
5. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2008). 21st Century skills, education & competitiveness. Retrieved December 8, 2011, from http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework
6. OECD (2005), Definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary, Paris: OECD.
7. 行政院主計總處(2012)。人力資源調查統計年報。台北：作者。
8. 教育部(2009)。教育部大專校院就業職能平台簡介，http://ucan.moe.edu.tw/
9. CAS(2009) . CAS General Standards .Retrieved 20 June 2012 from http://www.cas.edu/index.php/standards/
10. Occupational Information Network (2010).The O*NET content model . Retrieved 20 June 2010 from http://online.onetcenter.org/
11. 教育部(2012)。中華民國教育統計。台北：作者。
12. Conference Board of Canada (2000). Employability Skills 2000+. Retrieved 20 June 2012 from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/topics/education/learning-tools/employability-skills.aspx
13. 符碧真(2007)。大學教學與評量方式之研究。台灣高等教育研究電子報，10。2012 年9 月10 日，取自https://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?cat=136
14. Government of South Australia (2009). Employability Skills, Retrieved December 8, 2011, from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/learningandwork/pages/Preparing_for_transitions/Employability_skills/?reFlag=1
15. Anderson L. W.,Krathwohi D. R.(2001).Taxonomy for leaning, teaching and and assessing: a review of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives.New York:Longman.
16. Department for Education and skills(2003).Career Education and Guidance in England: A National Framework, 11-19.
17. Department of Education, Science and Training(2002).Employability skills for the future.Canberra, Australian Capital Territory:Author.
18. Harvey, L.,Locke, W.,Morey, A.(2002).Enhancing Employablity, Recognising Diversity.London:Universities UK..
19. Hauenstein(1998).A conceptual framework for educational objectives: A holistic approach to traditional taxonomies.University Press of America.
20. Holmes, G.,Hooper, N.(2000).Core competence and education.Higher Education,40,247-258.
21. Kapp, K. M.,Hamilton, B.(2006).White Paper: Designing Instruction to Teach Principles (soft skills).Department of Instructional Technology and Institute for Interactive Technologies.
22. Klabbers, J. H.(2000).Learning as acquisition and learning as interaction.Simulation & Gaming,31(3),380-406.
23. National Occupational Information Coordinating Committee(1989).National career development guidelines: Local handbook.Washington, DC:Author.
24. Spencer, L. M.,Spencer, S. M.(1993).Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
25. Trowler, P.,Wareham, T.(2008).,未出版
26. 王秀槐、王玉麟(2009)。歐盟動態循環課程規劃模式（Tuning process）簡介。評鑑雙月刊，20，40-45。
27. 王娟娟、李華(2010)。大學生課堂學習行為的研究。高教論壇，7，22-25。
28. 王瑩、梁美容、金維興(2006)。大學生淺層學習方法的實證分析。現代大學教育，3，93-97。
29. 金子元久(2007)。大学の教育力─何を教え、学ぶか。東京:???新書。
30. 劉孟奇、邱俊榮、胡均力(2006)。,台北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。
31. 鮑威(2010)。未完成的轉型：普及化階段首都高等教育的人才培養與學生發展。北京大學教育評論，2010(1)，27-44。

1. 陳僅麗,張淑芬,孫素靜(2022)。「跨領域職場實務」培訓課程對大學生校內工讀職能影響之探究：以文藻外語大學為例。學生事務與輔導，61(1)，40-58。
2. (2017)。大學校院學生文化資本、學校生活經驗與就業力之研究。教育與心理研究，40(3)，1-35。