網球正手截擊技能表現：工作限制與訓練效應

The Effect of Task Constraints and the Training Process on Tennis Volley Skills Performance

10.6634/JPSS-CCU.200606.04.01

林耀豐(Yaw-Feng Lin)；林清和(Ching-Ho Lin)；鄭富吉；陳和德；鄭守吉

運動發展 ； 工作限制 ； motor development ； task constraints

文化體育學刊

4輯（2006 / 06 / 01）

1 - 10

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的在探討：不同工作限制與訓練歷程，對技能操控與技能表現能力的影響。實驗一為預備性研究，在確認網球截擊學習週數及工具的信度與效度檢定；實驗二以初學網球者（平均身高：172.63±5.3公分、平均體重的45±4.58公斤）一百二十名男性，隨機分派至短拍小拍面組、中拍中拍面組、長拍大拍面組與控制組等四組。在實驗二期間每位實驗參加者依不同組別以三種球拍長度與三種拍面面積的組合（65公分95平方英吋、68公分110平方英吋及71公分120平方英吋）與控制組（原來使用的球拍），分別做32次正手截擊技能表現的前測與後測，其間介入四周的影片回饋教學與實際擊球之訓練課程，並以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析來加以考驗所得資料。而研究結果指出：不同工作限制下之球拍型態組別在技能表現品質方面，經影片分析回饋與實際擊球練習之介入訓練後皆顯現出其效應；而各肢體之技能表現品質在各組間雖有進步的趨勢，但進步的幅度並非呈現出一致的趨勢，顯示各動作成分之間的發展並非同步。

The main objectives of this research were: Investigate the effect of task constraints and the training process on skills control and skills performance ability. The participants in Experiment 1 of this study were pilot study. Experiment 2 extended the research of Experiment 1. The to begin to learn tennis participants (Height 172.63±5.3 cm, Weight, 69.45±4.58 kg,) were randomly assigned to four groups, 1) a short racket and small face area group, 2) a medium racket and face area group, 3) a long racket and large face area group, and 4) a control group for a total of 120 males. In Experiment 2, the 4 groups described above entered a four-week training program composed of video feedback teaching and practice hitting. By doing 32 trials, we could measure their scores should be analyzed by the one-way analysis of covariance. This was in order to investigate whether skills performance under task constraints can be improved through the course of training. The results of this study show that: In terms of the quality of skills performance for the different groups under different task constraints, following the film analysis feedback and the practice hitting training, the effectiveness of this training was clear. There was a trend towards improvement in the quality of skills performance for each individual extremity. However, the range of improvement was not the same for each group, showing that the development of the components of each action is not synchronous.

1. Christina, R. W.,Barresi, J. V.,Shaffner, P.(1990).The development of response selection accuracy in a football linebacker using video training.The Sport Psychologist,4,11-17.
2. Engstrom, G.(Ed.)(1971).The significance of the young child's motor development.Washington, D. C.:National Association for the Education of Young Children.
3. Farrow, D.,Chivers, P.,Hardingham, C.,Sachsse, S.(1998).The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve.International Joumal of Sport Psychology,29,231-242.
4. Gabbard, C. P.(1992).Lifelong motor development.Chicago:Brown & Benchmark.
5. Gallahue, D. L.,Ozmun, J. C.(1998).Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults.New York:McGraw-Hill.
6. Goodwin, D. L.,Watkinson, E. J.(2000).lnclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,17(2),144-160.
7. Poe, A.(1976).Description of the movement characteristics of two year old children performing the jump and reach.Research Quarterly,47,409-416.
8. Singer, R. N.,Cauraugh, J.H.,Chen, D.,Steinberg, S.G.,Wang, L.(1994).Training mental quickness in beginning/intermediate tennis players.The Sport Psychologist,8,305-318.
9. Thelen, E.(1989).The (Re)discovery of motor development: Learning new things from an old filed.Development Psychologist,25,946-949.
10. Thelen, E.,Ulrich, B. D.(1991).Hidden skills: A dynamical systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year.Monographs of Society for Research in child Development,56(1)
11. 林和譯、James, G.(1999)。混沌─不測風雲的背後。台北:天下文化出版社。
12. 胡名霞(2001)。運動控制與動作學習。台北市:金名圖書有限公司。
13. 楊梓楣(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
14. 楊梓楣、卓俊伶(1998)。接球動作型式的環境限制變項探討。體育學報，25，269-278。