不同回饋訊息型態對排球肩上飄浮發球技能學習之影響

The Effects of the Different Feedback Model on Volleyball Float Serve

10.6634/JPSS-CCU.200706.05.03

蕭今傑(Chin-Chieh Hsiao)

回饋訊息 ； 排球 ； 肩上飄浮發球 ； Feedback model ； Volleyball ； Float serve

文化體育學刊

5輯（2007 / 06 / 01）

21 - 32

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討運用不同回饋訊息方式對大專學生排球肩上飄浮發球技能學習的影響差異。受試者為大學體育課興趣選項排球選修課之86位男女學生，平均身高169.2±6.27公分，平均體重61.4±8.77公斤，平均年齡20.7±2.06歲。以排球選修課三個班級，每班為一個組別分配到三個組別（口語回饋組、標準影像組和綜合組）。並於前測後，接著進行為期12週，每週1次，共計12次每次一小時的實驗期，並於實驗完後馬上實行後測與7日之後保留測驗。本研究統計方法以二因子混合變異數分析來進行考驗。若達顯著性差異，則以單純主要效果與事後比較考驗。本研究之顯著水準訂為α=.05。本研究之結論分述如下： 一、回饋訊息對於排球肩上飄浮發球學習（測驗成績）與保留有相當的作用。 二、回饋訊息對於排球肩上飄浮發球之技能動作表現提升與保留有相當的作用。 三、排球肩上飄浮發球學習（測驗成績）方面，綜合組的學習效果與保留最佳，次之為標準影像組，最差為口語回饋組。 四、排球肩上飄浮發球技能動作方面，綜合組的學習效果與保留最佳，次之為標準影像組，最差為口語回饋組。

The aims of this study was discussed the effects of different feedback model on volleyball float serve. The subjects were 86 male and female students that average height was 169.2±6.27 cm, average weight 61.4±8.77 kg, average age 20.7±2.06 years old. They were assigned to the four experimental groups (control group, self-image group, standard-image group, and multiform group) randomly and carried the four weeks experiment period. The study took dual-factor mix design and comparison was made for any simple main effect or interaction having reached its significant level. The study set the significant level for all assumed tests at. 05. There are four conclusion as following: 1. The feedback benefit to the learning effect (testing grades) and retention of the over-arm float serve. 2. The feedback benefit to the movements learning effect and retention of the tennis float serve. 3. In the over-arm float serve of learning effect (testing grades), the multiform group had the great effect than the others in post-test and retention. 4. In the over-arm float serve of the movements learning effect, the multiform group had the great effect than the others in post-test and retention.

1. Adams, J. A.(1971).A closed-loop theory of motor learning.Journal of Motor Behavior,3,111-150.
2. Adams, J. A.,Lintern, G.(1977).Effects of visual and proprioceptive feedback on motor learning.Journal of Motor Learning,9,11-22.
3. Boyce, B. A.(1991).The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of an selected shooting task.Journal of teaching in physical education,11,47-58.
4. Den Brinker, B. P. L. M.,Stabler, J. R. L. W.,Whiting, H. T. A.,Van Wieringen, P. C.(1986).The effect of manipulating knowledge of results in the learning of slalom-ski type skill movements.Ergonomics,29,31-40.
5. Kernodle, M. W.,Carlton, L. G.(1992).Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree of freedom activities.Journal of Motor Behavior,24,187-196.
6. Little, W. S.,McCullagh, P.(1989).Motivation orientation and modeled instruction strategies: The effects on form and accuracy.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,11,41-53.
7. Magill, R. A.,Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B.(1996).A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill.International Journal of Sport Psychology,27,7-22.
8. Rikli, R.,Smith, G.(1980).Videotape feedback effects on tennis sering form.Perceptual and Motor Skills,50,895-901.
9. Schmidt, R. A.(1975).A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.Psychological Review,82,225-260.
10. Swinnen, S.,Schmidt, R. A.,Nicholson, D. E.,Shapiro, D. C.(1990).Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition,16,706-716.
11. Tzetzis, G.,Mantis, K.,Zachopoulou, E.,Kioumourtzoglou, E.(1999).The effect of modeling and verbal feedback on skill learning.Journal of Human Movement Syudies,36,137-151.
12. Viitasalo, J.,Ear, P.,Konttinen, N.,Mononen, H.,Mononen, K.,Norvapalo, K.(2001).Effects of 12-week shooting training and mode of feedback on shooting scores among novice shooters.Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports,11(6),362-368.
13. Wallace, S. A.,Hagler, R. W.(1979).Los Angeles,University of California, Los Angeles.
14. Wulf, G.,McConnel, N.,Gartner, M.,Schwarz, A.(2002).Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback.Journal of Motor Behavior,34(2),171-182.
15. Young, D. E.,Magill, R. A.,Shipiro, D. C.(1998).Motor programs as control structures for reversal movements: An examination of rapid movements and unrxpected perturbations.annual meeting of the North American Society of the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity,Knoxville, Tennessee:
16. 王秋容(1995)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
17. 石昌益(1997)。不同動作觀察對羽球高手擊長球技能學習效果。國立體育學院叢書，8(2)，203-221。
18. 林竹茂(1999)。大專排球論文集
19. 林竹茂(1979)。排球訓練法。中華民國體育協進會。
20. 張震輝(1991)。運動學習與回饋。德育學報，7，61-68。
21. 教育部體育司(1980)。大專院校運動技能測驗手冊。教育部體育司。
22. 陳玉芬(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，台灣，國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
23. 陳定國(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東市，台灣，國立台東師範學院教育研究所。
24. 陳麗勻(1988)。大專體育，45，29-360。
25. 楊智能(2000)。台北市，台灣，國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
26. 熊明禮(1997)。目標設定、表現獲知在保齡球直球及球教學效果的探討。復興學報，451-463。
27. 蔡崇濱(1988)。中華體育，51，29-306。
28. 簡桂彬(2000)。台北市，台灣，國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
29. 豐田博(1969)。バレ─ホ─ル教室。大修館書店。