賦權及削權動機氣候對青少年游泳選手退出意圖之關係：以團隊凝聚力為中介變項

The relationship between Empowering and Disempowering climates and Dropout Intention in youth swimmers: The mediating role of group cohesiveness

10.6634/JPSS-CCU.201910_(29).0005

陳巧穎(Chiao-Ying Chen)；季力康(Li-Kang Chi)

工作涉入 ； 自主支持 ； 社會支持 ； 自我涉入 ； 教練控制 ； task- involving ； autonomy-supportive ； socially-supportive ； ego-involving ； controlling coach behaviors

文化體育學刊

29輯（2019 / 10 / 01）

51 - 62

繁體中文

Duda（2013）結合成就目標理論及自我決定理論，提出教練塑造的賦權及削權動機氣候會影響選手的參與動機、基本心理需求及運動行為，因此本研究將延伸過去研究，探討賦權及削權動機氣候與青少年游泳選手退出意圖之關係，並檢驗團隊凝聚力的中介效果。本研究採問卷調查法，經參與者同意後發放問卷並剔除無效問卷，有效回收率為92%。參與者為147名青少年游泳選手（男性88名、女性59名），平均年齡15.33±1.66歲，以拔靴法進行中介效果檢驗。本研究結果顯示：（一）賦權動機氣候能正向預測工作凝聚力及社會凝聚力，負向預測退出意圖。（二）削權動機氣候能負向預測工作凝聚力及社會凝聚力，正向預測退出意圖。（三）團隊凝聚力中的工作凝聚力及社會凝聚力能負向預測退出意圖。（四）在賦權動機氣候預測退出意圖方面，工作凝聚力及社會凝聚力扮演完全中介的角色。而在削權動機氣候預測退出意圖方面，工作凝聚力及社會凝聚力則扮演部分中介的角色。結論：根據以上結果本研究建議游泳教練們，應儘量塑造賦權動機氣候取代削權動機氣候，如此不僅能夠提高團隊的工作及社會凝聚力，也能進而降低選手的退出意圖。

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between empowering and disempowering climates, and dropout intention and further examine the mediating effect of group cohesiveness. A total of 147 youth swimmers (age = 15.33 ± 1.66 years-old; males = 88, females = 59) were recruited as the participants. With the participants' agreement, they completed questionnaires independently to indicate their level of empowering and disempowering climates from their coaches, group cohesiveness, and dropout intention. Regression analysis was conducted to examine the mediating effect. There were four main results in this study. First, empowering climates can positively predict both types of group cohesiveness and negatively predict dropout intention. Second, disempowering climates can negatively predict both types of group cohesiveness and positively predict dropout intention. Third, both types of group cohesiveness and negatively predict dropout intention. The last results of the regression revealed that group cohesiveness fully mediated the relationship between empowering climates and dropout intention and it also partially mediated the relationship between disempowering climates and dropout Intention. The results revealed that the coaches' empowering and disempowering climates and group cohesiveness could influence youth swimmers' dropout intention. Therefore, coaches should use more empowering climates to replace disempowering climates and it is a possible way to enhance teams' group cohesiveness level and reduce youth swimmers' dropout intention.

1. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Journal of educational psychology,80(3),260.
2. Appleton, P. R.,Ntoumanis, N.,Quested, E.,Viladrich, C.,Duda, J. L.(2016).Initial validation of the coach-created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C).Psychology of Sport and Exercise,22,53-65.
3. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology,51(6),1173.
4. Bars, H. L.,Gernigon, C.,Ninot, G.(2009).Personal and contextual determinants of elite young athletes’persistence or dropping out over time.ScandinavianJournal of Medicine and Science in Sport,19,274-285.
5. Carron, A. V.(1982).Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations.Journal of Sport Psychology,4,123-138.
6. Carron, A. V.,Colman, M. M.,Wheeler, J.,Stevens, D.(2002).Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,24,168-188.
7. Carron, A.V.,Widmeyer, W. N.,Brawley, L. R.(1985).The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,244-266.
8. Cartwright, D.,Zander, A.(1968).Group dynamics:Research and theory ( 3rd Ed.)..New York:Harper & Row.
9. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality.Journal Research in Personality,19,109-134.
10. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2000).The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behaviour.Psychological Inquiry,11,227-268.
11. Duda, J. L.(2013).The conceptual and empirical foundations of Empowering CoachingTM: Setting the stage for the PAPA project.International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,11(4),311-318.
12. Festinger, L.,Schacter, S.,Back, K.(1950).Social Pressures in Informed Groups: A study of a Housing Project.New York:Harper & Row.
13. Guillet, E.,Sarrazin, P.(1999).L'influence du climat de l'entraîneur sur le processus motivationnel de l'abandon: Un test du modele hierarchique de Vallerand (1997).Science et motricité,38-39,105-106.
14. Jowett, S.(Ed.),Lavallee, D.(Ed.)(2007).Social psychology in sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
15. Kent, M. (2007). The Oxford dictionary of sports science & medicine (3 ed.). Retrieved from:http://www.oxfordreference.com/
16. MacKinnon, D. P.,Luecken, L. J.(2008).How and for whom? Mediation and moderation in health psychology.Health psychology,27(2S),S99.
17. Martens, R.,Peterson, J. A.(1971).Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance.International Review for the Sociology of Sport,6(1),49-61.
18. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(2002).How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power.Structural equation modeling,9(4),599-620.
19. Newton, M.,Duda, J. L.,Yin, Z.(2000).Examination of the psychometric properties of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 in asample of female athletes.Journal of Sports Sciences,18(4),275-290.
20. Preacher, K. J.,Hayes, A. F.(2004).SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers,36(4),717-731.
21. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Intrinsic and extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new directions.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),54-67.
22. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept.Psychological Inquiry,11,319-338.
23. Sarrazin, P. G.,Boiché, J. C. S.,Pelletier, L. G.(2007).A Self-Determination approach to sport dropout.intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport,Champaign, Illinois:
24. 方介德(2015)。國立體育學院。
25. 周學雰(2008)。國立臺北教育大學體育學系碩士班。
26. 林季燕(2003)。國立體育學院。
27. 洪建智(2005)。國立體育學院教練研究所。
28. 陳律伶(2014)。國立臺灣師範大學。
29. 盧素娥(1995)。國立體育大學。

1. 李佳晏(2023)。教練領導行為、運動倦怠對學生運動員運動退出影響之研究。臺東大學體育學報，38，37-56。
2. 葉良志,傅姿伶,林奕均(2022)。賦權與削權動機氣候與高中運動員自我決定動機之關係：心理堅韌性的中介。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，21(1)，26-40。
3. (2024)。高中運動員知覺賦權、削權動機氣候與運動倦怠關係之探討：心理安全感的中介角色。運動研究，33(1)，61-76。
4. (2024)。教練行為對團隊凝聚力的影響：人際關係的中介作用。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，23(1)，60-76。
5. (2024)。運動場域中賦權與削權動機氣候的學理發展與特徵。大專體育，168，1-14。