大學生身體自我概念簡式量表之編製

The Study of the Development of Short-Form Scale of College Student Physical Self-Concept

10.6214/JSRM.201212_9(2).0017

王志全(Chih-Chuan Wang)

身體自我概念 ； 結構方程模式 ； 驗證式因素分析 ； Physical Self-concept ； Structural Equation Model ； Confirmatory Factor Analysis

運動休閒管理學報

9卷2期（2012 / 12 / 01）

264 - 277

繁體中文

本研究目的旨在建構大學生身體自我概念簡化量表，以探索式因素分析和結構方程模式中的「驗證式因素分析」進行模式驗證，以建立具信度及效度之衡量量表。研究方法採問卷調查法，以全國大學生為施測對象，共獲得1024份有效問卷，經驗證性因素分析顯示本研究模式無違犯估計，並通過模式適配指標之考驗，具有良好之建構效度與組合信度，顯示大學生身體自我概念簡化量表的因素結構可以成立，其研究結果為一個具有九個因素之模式，包含身體活動、身體脂肪、自我認同、力量、健康、耐力、柔軟度、運動能力與身體外觀九個因素，共得35題項。研究結論顯示，本研究之量表可以適用於衡量大學生身體自我概念之研究工具，並具有量表題項簡化之效果，藉以提升未來研究施測之效率與有效回收率。

The purpose of this study was to development of ”Short-Form Scale of college student physical self-concept”. It was used exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of structural equation model to test the model to proof and expected to develop a physical self-concept scale with reliability and validity. For this, the methods used physical self-concept questionnaire to investigate university students and 1024 valid questionnaires were collected. The results indicate that Confirmatory factor analysis showed that model had no offending estimate and model test revealed an acceptable fit, therefore, the model had good validity and reliability. As a result, the study showed that the factor structure of physical self-concept scale existed and it with night factors including physical activity, body fat, self-identity, strength, health, endurance, flexibility, sports competence and appearance, 35 items. The conclusion in this research shows that the physical self-concept scale was adequate to measure physical self-concept and to simplify. As such, this study attempt to increase test efficiency and valid collected for future research.

1. 劉季彥、劉建恆(2003)。大專生運動參與頻率及自覺運動強度對身體自我概念之影響。大專體育學刊，5(2)，111-120。
   連結：
2. 教育部統計處（ 2012 ） 。各級學校名錄。2012 年4 月5 日。取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=25656
3. Beaton, D. E.,Wright, J. G.,Katz, J. N.(2005).Development of the Quick DASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery,87,1038-1046.
4. Bentler, P. M.,Wu, E. J. C.(1993).EQS/Windows use's guide.Los Angeles, CA:BMDP Statistical Software.
5. Denby, P. A.(1977).Springfield, MA,Springfield College.
6. Fox, K. R.,Cobin, C. B.(1989).The physical self-perceptions profile development and preliminary validation.Journal of Sport Psycology,11,408-430.
7. Joreskog, K. G.,Sorbom, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago, IL:SPSS Inc..
8. Marsh, H. W.,Asci, F. H.,Tomas, I. M.(2002).Multitrait-multimethod analyses of two physical self-concept instruments: A cross-cultural perspective.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,24,99-119.
9. Marsh, H. W.,Hau, K. T.,Balla, J. R.,Grayson, D.(1998).Is more ever too much? The number of 43 indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research,33(2),181-220.
10. Marsh, H. W.,Perry C.(2005).Self-concept contributed to winning gold medals: Casual ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,27,71-91.
11. Marsh, H. W.,Redmayne, R. S.(1994).A multidimen-sional physical self-concept and its relations to multiple components of physical fitness.Journal of Sport & Exercise Phychology,16,43-55.
12. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling,104,622-647.
13. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(1996).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill Prentice-Hall.
14. Shavelson, R. J.,Hubner, J.,tanton, G. C.(1976).Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation.Review of Education Research,46,407-441.
15. Sonstroem, R. J.,Morgan, W. P.(1989).Exercise and self-esteem: Rationale and model.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,21,329-337.
16. Stangvik, G.(1979).Self-concept and school segregation.Goteborg, Sweden:ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
17. Thorndike, R. L.(Ed.)(1971).Educational measurement.Washington, DC:American Council on Education.
18. Wilfley, D. E.,Kunce, J. T.(1986).Differential physical and psychological effects of exercise.Journal of Counseling Psychology,33(3),337-342.
19. 林岑怡(2005)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
20. 林國順(2005)。彰化縣，大葉大學。
21. 張春興(2003)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
22. 陳美華(2005)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
23. 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式在教育資料應用之研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
24. 葉素汝(2004)。身體自我概念與運動行為關係之探討。大專體育，75，134-142。
25. 葉素茹(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。

1. 黃瑞榮、林希彥、王志全(2014)。不同背景變項大學運動員知覺教練期望價值與身體自我概念之差異研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(3)，158-167。