大學生的不同背景變項對休閒涉入與休閒效益之研究

Research on University Students' Leisure Involvement and The Leisure Benefits Affected by Different Background Variables

10.6214/JSRM.1303.001

侯堂盛(Tang-Shang Ho)；楊孟華(Meng-Hua Yang)

休閒涉入 ； 休閒效益 ； 大學生 ； Leisure Involvement ； Leisure Benefits ； University Students

運動休閒管理學報

13卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

1 - 17

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在瞭解大學生的不同背景變項在休閒涉入與休閒效益之差異及預測情形與不同休閒涉入程度對休閒效益之差異情形和其典型相關情形。以嘉義地區某大學學生為研究對象，有效問卷608份。研究結果發現如下：（一）大學生居住地與父母的婚姻狀況、健康狀況、教育程度、管教方式和父親職業等變項，未達顯著差異；大學生的性別與休閒涉入和休閒效益、大學生的年級與休閒涉入和休閒效益、母親職業與大學生的休閒涉入程度和休閒效益，則達到顯著差異。（二）大學生的不同程度休閒涉入在休閒效益上，亦達顯著差異。（三）大學生的性別、年級和母親職業，能有效預測休閒涉入，以性別最具預測力（β = -.19）；大學生的性別與母親職業，能有效預測休閒效益，以性別最具預測力（β = -.13）。（四）在典型因素中，休閒涉入會影響休閒效益，有密切正向關係存在。本研究建議應該針對大學生多多的宣導休閒活動所能帶來的各種益處，大學生如能多從事休閒活動的參與，同時提昇涉入的程度，才是達到休閒活動的真正目的。

The purpose of this study was to explore the relations among leisure involvement, leisure benefits and the background variables. The differences, predictions and the results of canonical analysis were adopted in this study, to inspect and discover the relations among variables. Subjects of this study were 608 valid samples collected randomly from university students in Chiayi areas. The results were as followed: 1. Students' gender and their leisure involvement and benefits, students' year and their leisure involvement and benefits, and mother's occupation and the students' leisure involvement and benefits achieved significant difference. University students' place of residence, parents' marital status, health conditions, education, family discipline, and the father's occupation did not achieve significant differences. 2. Students' leisure involvement was significantly different in leisure benefit. 3. Students' gender, year, and mother's occupation could efficiently predict leisure involvement, with gender having the most predictive power (β = -.19); students' gender and mother's occupation could efficiently predict leisure benefits, with gender having the most predictive power (β = -.13). 4. For canonical correlation factors, leisure involvement would affect the benefits and there was a close, positive relation between the two. From the result, this study further suggested that participation of leisure activities of university students should be promoted.

1. Huang, F. M.(2000).Teenage participation in economic activities: True state dependence or heterogeneity?.Academia Economic Papers,28,46-66.
   連結：
2. 洪慧純、黃美珍(2011)。高雄市國中生桌球課程涉入程度與休閒效益認知之研究。運動與健康研究，1(1)，69-97。
   連結：
3. 郎亞琴、雷文谷、蔡靖婷(2012)。角色扮演者休閒動機、休閒涉入及休閒效益關係之研究。休閒產業管理學刊，5(2)，20-34。
   連結：
4. 張家銘、林麗娟、張良漢(2007)。國小學童休閒涉入與休閒體驗之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究，2(4)，21-38。
   連結：
5. 郭進財、顏秀燕(2012)。休閒涉入與工作滿意度之研究—以2011 年行政院體育委員會打造運動島計畫嘉義市為例。海峽兩岸體育研究學報，6，15-29。
   連結：
6. 趙仁方、林錦玲、章箴慧(2014)。高等教育機構職員的休閒涉入、休閒效益與工作滿意度之關係。島嶼觀光研究，7(3)，1-26。
   連結：
7. 鍾潤華(2015)。2015 年苗栗縣『理事長盃』慢速壘球賽參與動機、涉入程度與休閒效益之研究。運動休閒管理學報，12(4)，18-34。
   連結：
8. Argyle, M.(1996).The social psychology of leisure.London:Penguin.
9. Bammel, G.,Burrus-Bammel, L. L.(1982).Leisure and behavior.Dubuqne, IA:Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher..
10. Bright, A. D.(2000).The role of social marketing in leisure and recreation 156 management.Journal of Leisure Research,32(1),12-18.
11. Datcher, L.(1982).Effects of community and family background on achievement.Review of Economics and Statistics,64(1),32-41.
12. Driver, B. L.(ed.),Brown, P. J.(ed.),Peterson, G. L.(ed.)(1991).Benefits of leisure.Stage College, PA:Venture Publishing.
13. Duncan, G. J.(1994).Families and neighbors as sources of disadvantage in the schooling decisions of white and black adolescents.American Journal of Education,103(1),20-53.
14. Engel, J. F.,Blackwell, R. D.,Miniard, P. W.(1993).Consumer Behavior (7th).Orlando Florida:Dryden Press.
15. Havitz, M. E.,Dimanche, F.(1997).Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances.Journal of Leisure Research,3,1-18.
16. Havitz, M. E.,Dimanche, F.(1990).Propositions for testing the Involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts.Leisure Sciences,12(2),179-195.
17. Havitz, M. E.,Mannell, R. C.(2005).Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities.Journal of Leisure Research,37(2),152-177.
18. Kuo, C. T.(2013).Leisure involvement, leisure benefits, quality of life, and job satisfaction: A case studt on 2011 creating sports island plan in Chiayi City, Taiwan held by Sports Affairs Council, Executive Yuan.International Review of Management and Business Research,2(2),421-428.
19. Plug, E.,Vijverberg, W.(2003).Schooling, family background, and adoption: Is it nature or is it nurture?.Journal of Political Economy,111(3),611-641.
20. Pons, E.,Gonzalo, M. T.(2002).Returns to schooling in Spain: How reliable are instrumental variable estimates?.Labour,16(4),747-770.
21. Rothschild, M. L.(1984).Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions.Advances in Consumer Research,11,216-217.
22. Selin, S. W.,Howard, D. R.(1988).Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification.Journal of Leisure Research,20(3),237-244.
23. Verduin, J. R.,McEwen, D. N.(1984).Adults and their leisure: The need for lifelong learning.Springfield, Ill:Charles C. Thomas.
24. 朱琡琤、徐瓊信(2012)。澎湖縣社區大學學員休閒之知覺自由、休閒涉入及休閒效益之研究。社區發展季刊，140，276-290。
25. 吳永發(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育大學。
26. 李思瑩(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南，南台科技大學。
27. 林生傳(2005)。教育社會學。台北:巨流圖書有限公司。
28. 邱沛琪(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，南華大學。
29. 徐新勝(2007)。嘉義縣，中正大學。
30. 高俊雄(1995)。休閒利益三因素模式。戶外遊憩研究，8(1)，15-28。
31. 陳嘉雯(2006)。台北市，銘傳大學。
32. 劉佳蕙(2011)。家長安排大班幼兒休閒活動之調查研究：以台南市為例。台灣首府大學學報，2，1-20。
33. 謝筑虹(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立體育學院。

1. 吳孟儒(Meng-Ju Wu);曾治乾(Chie-Chien Tseng);劉荐宏(Chien-Hung Liou)(2021)。COVID-19期間對金門縣民休閒需求、休閒阻礙與休閒效益之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊。20(2)。39-57。 
2. 王昱鈞(Yu-Chun Wang);張宗琦(Tsung-Chi Chang);張伯茹(Po-Ju Chang)(2024)。大學校園規劃對大學生健康促進生活型態之影響。戶外遊憩研究。37(3)。49-80。