题名

台灣競技運動員運動禁藥管制認識之調查－以羽球運動員為例

并列篇名

Survey of Doping Control in Taiwan's Badminton Athletes

DOI

10.6127/JEPF.2005.03.11

作者

姜金龍(Chin-Jung Chiang)；莊鑫裕(Hsin-Yu Chuang)；林銘祥(Min-Hsiang Lin)

关键词

羽球 ； 運動禁藥管制 ； 檢測 ； 處罰 ； 市售藥品 ； Badminton ； Doping control ； Testing ； Sanction ； Over-the-counter drugs

期刊名称

運動生理暨體能學報

卷期/出版年月

3輯（2005 / 12 / 16）

页次

109 - 119

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

The aim of this study was to understand differences of doping control recognition in Taiwan badminton athletes. A questionnaire was designed to recognize the doping control (basic concept, testing, sanction & over-the-counter drug) by researchers. Subjects were selected through stratified sampling from the National College Student Game in both 2000 and 2004 and National Badminton Championship in 2004. One hundred and ninety nine questionnaires were completed and 19 were excluded due to incomplete data. They were divided into three groups (elite, high-level & non-high-level). Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were applied in this study. Results showed that: a) most athletes (about 70%) knew the basic concepts. However, only about 40% athletes knew completely procedures of testing and sanction content; b) high-level athlete's recognition of basic concepts (χ^2(subscript 1,776)=5.060, p＜.05) and testing (χ^2(subscript 1,675)=13.024, p＜.05) in 2004 was higher than that in 2000. And non-high-level athlete's testing recognition was the same (χ^2(subscript 1,389)=6.280, p＜.05); c) various levels were significant difference on recognition of doping control (p＜.05), whereas, elite had greater recognition. It was concluded that badminton athletes did not recognized deeply in doping control in Taiwan. We suggest that sport institutions should provide more educational courses of doping for athletes.
英文摘要

The aim of this study was to understand differences of doping control recognition in Taiwan badminton athletes. A questionnaire was designed to recognize the doping control (basic concept, testing, sanction & over-the-counter drug) by researchers. Subjects were selected through stratified sampling from the National College Student Game in both 2000 and 2004 and National Badminton Championship in 2004. One hundred and ninety nine questionnaires were completed and 19 were excluded due to incomplete data. They were divided into three groups (elite, high-level & non-high-level). Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were applied in this study. Results showed that: a) most athletes (about 70%) knew the basic concepts. However, only about 40% athletes knew completely procedures of testing and sanction content; b) high-level athlete's recognition of basic concepts (χ^2(subscript 1,776)=5.060, p＜.05) and testing (χ^2(subscript 1,675)=13.024, p＜.05) in 2004 was higher than that in 2000. And non-high-level athlete's testing recognition was the same (χ^2(subscript 1,389)=6.280, p＜.05); c) various levels were significant difference on recognition of doping control (p＜.05), whereas, elite had greater recognition. It was concluded that badminton athletes did not recognized deeply in doping control in Taiwan. We suggest that sport institutions should provide more educational courses of doping for athletes.
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. Ama, P. F.,Betnga, B.,Ama Moor, V. J.,Kamga, J. P.(2003).Football and doping: study of African amateur footballer.British Journal of Sports and Medicine,37(4),307-310.
  2. Anshel, M. H.,Russell K. G.(1997).Examining athletes' attitudes toward using anabolic steroids and possible effects.Journal of Drug Education,27(2),121-145.
  3. Chester, N.,Reilly, T.,Mottram, D. R.(2003).Over-the-counter drug use amongst athletes and non-athletes.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,43(1),111-118.
  4. Kindlundh, A. M.,Isacson, D. G.,Berglund, L.,Nyberg, F.(1997).Doping among high school students in Uppsala, Sweden: A presentation of the attitudes, distribution, side effects, and extent of use.Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine,76(1),71-74.
  5. Laure, P.(1997).Epidemiologic approach of doping in sport. A review.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,37(3),218-224.
  6. Laure, P.,Reinsberger, H.(1995).Doping and high-level endurance walkers. Knowledge and representation of a prohibited practice.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,35,228-231.
  7. Laure, P.,Thouvenin, F.,Lecerf, T.(2001).Attitudes of coaches towards doping.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,41,132-136.
  8. Tricker, R.(2000).Painkilling drugs in collegiate athletics: knowledge, attitudes, and use of student athletes.Journal of Drug Education,30(3),313-324.
  9. Tricker, R.,Connlly, D.(1997).Drugs and the college athlete: an analysis of student athletes at risk.Journal of Drug Education,27(2),105-119.
  10. 中華台北奧林匹克委員會(2002)。處理運動員違規使用運動禁藥作業要點。台北:
  11. 日本オリンピック委員会(1997)。アンチ‧ドーピングガイドブック。東京:財?法人日本??????委員?。
  12. 王翠敏、許美智(1998)。台灣區運動會83-86選手用藥之調查研究。中華體育季刊，12(2)，120-128。
  13. 全國大專院校運動會運動禁藥管制委員會(2000)。運動禁藥管制手冊。新竹:明新技術學院。
  14. 全國大專院校運動會運動禁藥管制委員會(2004)。運動禁藥管制手冊。台中:國立台灣體育學院。
  15. 莊鑫裕、林銘祥(2004)。台灣地區大專運動員運動禁藥管制之調查：2000年和2004年的比較。東大體育學報，2，177-188。
  16. 許美智(2000)。運動與禁藥。台北市:合記。
  17. 曾玉華(2002)。運動禁藥的認知應用與教育宣導研究～以我國競技運動員及教練為例。教育部升等副教授論文
  18. 曾應龍(2000)。運動員藥檢宣導手冊。花蓮市:慈濟大學運動員藥物檢驗中心。
print cancel